Fortune 100 get Java audit letters for the first time
www.theregister.com
Expansion of compliance activity follows per-employee licensing change
  • paf0@lemmy.world
    0·
    6 months ago

    Feel free to use it, as long as you’re willing to pay lawyers to fight them when they decide otherwise.

      • paf0@lemmy.world
        0·
        6 months ago

        It’s just my reasoning as to why I won’t use Oracle products. Feel free to put your own company at risk.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          0·
          6 months ago

          I f’ing love how you’re blaming me personally. Don’t be a dick.

          BTW - don’t mistake “cynicism” for “reasoning”.

          • paf0@lemmy.world
            0·
            6 months ago

            Sorry, I have my own company, my choices matter, you should blame whomever made that choice for you.

            It’s not necessarily cynicism if it’s based on previous patterns of behavior. Oracle reveals themselves to be run by bullies again and again and I choose to not put myself at risk. You do you.

            • atzanteol@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              0·
              6 months ago

              It’s not necessarily cynicism if it’s based on previous patterns of behavior.

              It’s exactly what it is because you’re ignoring facts that contradict your position because “I’ve been hurt before”. The OpenJDK license is currently the MOST permissive it’s ever been. And that was done by Oracle which is shocking to me.

              The GPL is an old and well accepted license and there are lots of groups who will jump to defend it. And there are lots of companies backing the OpenJDK that aren’t Oracle. Oracle would need to fight Amazon, Microsoft, IBM (RedHat), the Eclipse Foundations, etc. if they wanted to change that.