• WallEx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Okay, I promise the did go big brother.

    So what now, my word against theirs?

  • fluckx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Here’s a License change which implies we’re datafarming all your assets.

    Here’s my word that we’re absolutely not goijf to be doing that. Trust me bro.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Pirating Adobe software is exactly what they want you to do. Their business model relies on businesses paying for their license because people already know how to use their software, in large part because people pirate it, and also they have deals with schools to teach their software.

      What Adobe actually doesn’t want you to do is to learn the software of their competition, since that’s how they will lose money in the long term.

      • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        This. Right here.

        The main reason we need to push for open source alternatives is this. The more people learn how to use them the more content around them we get and more people take interest in using it and helping develop it (and donate to it).

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          I went to Affinity Photo and Illustrator years ago, and I’m a fan. One time purchase, easy to use, and full tutorials from the creators on Vimeo. Only downside is that it’s only available on Apple devices.

          https://affinity.serif.com

          • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            And it’s a huge downside. Meanwhile open source apps are usually available on every platform, with no purchase required.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              I hear you. I used to use GIMP before I paid for PS. I bailed when Adobe went subscription, and figured I’d try Affinity for $10. It’s worth every penny. I’d get behind an open source alternative again if it met my needs.

              • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                26 days ago

                I can understand it, I almost paid for Davinci Resolve Studio due to it still being the most complete video editor that works on Linux, most of the time closed source apps function better (specially due to the biggest funding), but still, using open source whenever you can basically prevents this from ever happening (specially after Canva bought Affinity, I’d keep an eye out for the eventual enshittification)

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        It won’t have anything that relies on “the cloud”

        When you use the AI services in Photoshop, it tries to connect to their servers. But to crack Photoshop, you need to blacklist all those servers. If you try to, say, use the automatic background removal tool, Photoshop will give you a message saying that it will run the (worse) version locally because it can’t connect.

        Not that I’d know or anything. A friend of a friend told me. Basically a stranger. Don’t even know his name.

        • Jakdracula@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Right, Since it can’t call home, the advanced features will not work or at least not work as described, is that correct?

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Those are the easiest apps to replace. I’ll just use Gimp and Inkscape until I die. Not even tempted by Adobe’s bloat, spyware, etc.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    They just wanna review your work 😀. What if you’re trying to put a penis on Trump’s face and it’s too big or it’s pointing the wrong way or something? You know. Wouldn’t you want to be told stuff like " the police is coming unless you erase this now!" You know, things like that? It would definitely come in handy to catch kids doing nudes of others. Or adults doing nudes of other adults who didn’t know. I wouldn’t want to end up in a collage of nudes that is 20MBb 1080p or 4K.

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    Riiiight. And, pray tell Adobe, why in the everloving fuck woul you ever need to “review” private content that’s not posted anywhere? Stop acting like you’re the goddamned pre-crime agency from Minority Report and keep your dirty paws off stuff people are creating privately.

    You are providing tools, and that’s it. I can do horrible, illegal shit with my drill, but it doesn’t give Black&Decker any right to break into my house to do random checks and see if I’m drilling through kneecaps instead of wooden planks…

  • OhmsLawn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    claims that the company often uses machine learning to review user projects for signs of illegal content

    OK, so what happens when Florida starts deciding more content is illegal?

    Literally big brother shit.

  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    “Adobe does not train Firefly Gen AI models on customer content. Firefly generative AI models are trained on a dataset of licensed content, such as Adobe Stock, and public domain content where copyright has expired.”

    This references a single particular product. lol. If they’re training a model by a different name with customer data, it would still be a true statement.

    The points about lawyers and NDA’s hit the nail on the head. I thought something similar with the Windows Recall debacle. That’s a juicy set of data for anyone looking to find journalist sources or scrape a hospital’s network. In every case it relies on the end user (business or individual) to know how to disable those features with GPOs/registry options… There’s no way 100% of them realize the issue and have the knowledge to fix it.

  • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    But “big brother” would mean they watch you.

    I read everywhere that they claim the rights to your projects, which is far worse than just watching over your shoulder innit?

    • Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Where did you read that? I can bet it wasn’t the TOS, because that’s not in there. The TOS allows Adobe to review anything you create with its products using manual or automated means, and maybe restricted to normal screening for CSAM and such (although it’s really ambiguous about what they’ll actually do with it).

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Interesting, we get to either hate them for going full big brother, or hate them for going full adobe in the first place. It’s nice to have a choice sometimes.