• mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Your awesome for correcting me (I use vim BTW)

        Plus emacs and lisp are superior. But I didn’t managed to jump ships.

  • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    We need more shorter games, made by happier devs paid more to work fewer hours, with worse graphics.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Steam is full of shorter games with worse graphics made by indy devs. Guess what? No one gives a shit! Because no one needs crappy games from 1980-s.

      • yistdaj@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        I quite like many games with “poor” graphics. Perhaps not exclusively, but you’re seriously missing out if you only go for realistic-looking or detailed games. Give a few of those indie games a try, you might be surprised.

        Edit: Oh, and terminal games are cool! Usually not very performant though.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          Nah, sorry, I’m not playing pixelated crap on my dual screen 4K set up. That was cool back in the 1990-s on my Sega Mega Drive, but I outgrew that a long time ago. Fuck, I’m old…

      • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        Some of them are really succesful. Many people care. Others don’t.

        Here the current Steam charts. Many indie games, some few with really low specs. Banana only needs 30MB RAM. Seems to be a great game. Hostly now, why are 50k people playing that “game” currently?

        But back on topic: Yes, AAA games are more succesfull and earn much more money, but claiming “no one cares about indie” is stupid, when so many people play games like Rust, Stardew Valley, Prison Architect, Terraria, RimWorld, Valheim, The Forest, …

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          Games like Valheim and Rust are not some pixel art games which will run on a 2GB system with an integrated GPU, they’re pretty much AA games with an AA level publisher behind them. Yes, there are some real exceptions, like Stardew Valley, but you can count them on your fingers. They don’t make even a 1% of Steam catalogue. Thus my point still stands - no one cares about low end games.

          • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            30 days ago

            Even if they don’t make up 1% of Steam’s catalogue (though I doubt that figure), they have had real impact.

            It’s ok to not like them personally, but to say no one cares is disingenuous. Balatro doesn’t require much in terms of hardware but is having a real moment right now. Stardew Valley has been killing it for 8 years. People have thousands of hours in Rimworld.

            Indie games are also great for community and modders.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          This is data from 2020 https://www.statista.com/statistics/1356730/steam-indie-game-revenue-genre/ but I believe it’s still pretty relevant.

          In short, indie games are the games no one is playing. A tiny fraction of indies bring more than $200k, while AA and AAA bring in millions and hundreds of millions.

          The idea that we need shitty games with piss poor graphics is just plain wrong. What we need are high res games to enjoy 4K experiences.

          • yistdaj@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            30 days ago

            I think this is a false dichotomy and an over-simplistic view of the game industry. Remember, there are far more indie games than AAA, so of course they’re going to earn less, there are more to choose from. Plus, if an indie game does too well, it often stops being indie. Most of the money for AAA games is from the same few people paying thousands of dollars in many small purchases too.

            Anecdotally, most people’s favourite games are, or at least started off as indie games. However, most people’s least favourite are going to be indie as well. I think the thing with indie games is that they vary a lot, often exploring things that many publishers simply aren’t willing to. This allows them to find and fill a niche perfectly that a publisher can never fill. The main thing is that people see this and start making their own indie games, leading to market saturation pretty quickly.

            Plus, the vast majority of people still don’t have 4K monitors. It may be the future, but you seem to think that’s where we are now when we just aren’t.

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The thing is that developers tend to keep things as simple as possible and overly optimize stuff, when you find bloatware is usually some manager that decided to have it.

    • lord_admiral@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The thing is

      Of course, we developers like to optimize and patch source code all the time. If I am suddenly woken up at three in the morning, I will immediately open the lid of my laptop and start optimizing the code. That’s our little developer secret.

    • herrvogel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s the marketing. Always the marketing. Especially the SEO guys.

      One SEO guy we worked with told us not to cache our websites because he was convinced that it helped. He badgered us about it for weeks, showed us some bullshit graphs and whatever. One day we got fed up and told him we’d disabled the cache and he should keep an eye out for any improvements in traffic. Obviously we didn’t actually do anything of the sort because we are not fucking idiots. Couple days later the SEO wizard sent us another bunch of figures and said “see, I told you it would help I know my stuff”. He did not, in fact, know his stuff.

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Couple days later the SEO wizard sent us another bunch of figures and said “see, I told you it would help I know my stuff”. He did not, in fact, know his stuff.

        Ahaha no way.

  • manicdave@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can think of a few games franchises that wouldn’t have trashed their reputation if they’d have had an internal rule like “if it doesn’t play on 50% of the machines on Steam’s hardware survey, it’s not going out”

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think it’s given us a big wave of “Return to pixelated tradition” style games. When you see 16-bit sprites in the teaser, you can feel reasonably confident your computer will run it.

      • manicdave@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t mind if indie devs try something experimental that melts your computer. Like beamNG needs a decent computer but the target audience kinda knows about that sort of stuff.

        The problem is with games like cities skylines 2. Most people buying that game probably don’t even know how much RAM they have, it shouldn’t be unplayable on a mid range PC.

      • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Unless they use Unreal Engine and don’t know what they are doing. It can be pixely and run like ass.

        Octopath Traveler was the last UE based game that really ran well that I can remember.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Was that game any good? The mobile version had a Gacha mechanic that scared me off, but it otherwise looked like a really smooth SNES style JRPG.

          • Joe Cool@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I liked it. It’s not particularly hard or deep but the mechanics are nice, battles and encounters don’t overstay their welcome. The interwoven story was done quite nicely. I played it on PC. It runs great on Proton and Windows 7.

            I haven’t played the second one, but reviews consider it an improvement. Now that they removed Denuvo I might get it.

  • WolfLink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The ideal is “plays fine at lowest graphics settings on old hardware” while having “high graphics settings” that look fantastic but requires too-of-the-line hardware to play reasonably.

    Generally this is almost impossible to achieve.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I knew someone that refused to upgrade the programmer’s workstation precisely because it would have been a big leap in performance compared to what their costumers used the software on. Needless to say the program was very fast even on weaker hardware.

  • FlapJackFlapper@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reminds me of a funny story I heard Tom Petty once tell. Apparently, he had a buddy with a POS car with a crappy stereo, and Tom insisted that all his records had to be mixed and mastered not so that they sound great on the studio’s million dollar equipment but in his friend’s car.

    • tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Reminds me of the ass audio mixing in movies where it is only enjoyable in a 7.1 cinema or your rich friends home theater but not on your own setup

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It seems we’ve lost sight of reality there.

        As we don’t intend to attend much cinema any more, I hope they bring back essentially a Dolby Noise Switch for movies. I don’t want to sacrifice too much, but booming noise followed by what comes out as whispered dialogue really cheapens the experience.

        I hope they can find a process that gives us back a sound track for the sub-17:7 sound system.

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          They could add more audio tracks for different systems. Blurays support multiple audio tracks and they are almost never full.

          • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’ve always wanted to try putting something like a guitar compressor pedal in the audio chain just to normalize the peaks. My wife will find something to watch, but ends up spending half the time adjusting the volume, or just turning on subtitles.

              • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                30 days ago

                I have a much simpler setup though. Just a ‘smart’ TV and a sound bar I paid about $200 for so nothing fancy.

                Not actually looking for advice, just a thought experiment of quick, easy and cheap fixes.

        • glitchdx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Dynamic Range Compression. VLC player has it, possibly under a different name though. Set it up on my theater pc, and I almost don’t need subtitles anymore.

    • Lorindól@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had the same exact approach back in the late 90’s. My friends had several band projects and when they were mixing their demos, I insisted that if the mixes sound good in a standard car stereo, they’ll sound good anywhere.

    • mPony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is still a perfectly sound method.

      Getting the music you made in your own DAW to sound good on your home speakers is almost easy. getting it to not suck on shitty speakers? that’s an art.

    • magikmw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Then again my 2016 stock yaris had the best sound I ever heard anywhere.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s how my professors instructed me to mix. To make it sound as good on shitty speakers as possible and also sound good on expensive systems.

    • lauha@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was going to laught at the hypocricy of you using lemmy, definitely not using your TRS-80 but I don’t trust my phone, the lemmy app or lemmy server either.

      • RaccoonBall@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Trash 80 dialing in to a Linux shell account using one of the various cli lemmy clients should work

  • jpeps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reminds me of the UK’s Government Digital Services, who want to digitise government processes but also have a responsibility to keep that service as accessible and streamlined as possible, so that even a homeless person using a £10 phone on a 2G data service still has an acceptable experience.

    An example. Here they painstakingly remove JQuery (most modern frameworks are way too big) from the site and shave 32Kb off the site size.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The issue with UK services is that they all are fucking random and plenty of sections don’t work. There are billions of logins, bugs and sometimes you just get redirected to some bloody nightmare portal from 1990-s. And EU citizens couldn’t log in into HMRC portal for years after Brexit, what a fucking joke! And all they do is spend time removing jQuery, good fucking job!

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hasn’t been linked to reddit yet probably.

        Getting away from reddit has shown me that there are unspoiled places in the digital world out there, communities of people who actually care about the topic and not performatism and internet attention.

        • mPony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          a) don’t let in anyone who acts like petulant children b) give adults an outlet for occasional outbursts that would make them sound like petulant children

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      At a certain point it makes more sense to subsidize better low-end hardware than to make every web site usable on a 20 year old flip phone. I’d argue that if saving 32 kB is considered a big win, you’re well past that point. Get that homeless guy a £50 phone and quit wasting the time of a bunch of engineers who make more than that in an hour.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Also, engieneers already had tech debt of updating to new jQuery version, which can result in a lot of wierd bugs, so it was achiveing two goals at once.

        And probably 50£ phone IS their target device.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Get that homeless guy a home.

        Also, if you are in a basement/mountains/middle of Siberia, waiting for 32 kB takes quite some time.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I’m all for ending homelessness, but that’s really a different problem than we were discussing. I’m pretty confident jQuery isn’t stopping anyone from being housed.

          Anyway, there’s no way you’re gonna convince me 32 kB is a lot of data. It’s just not. Even the slowest 3G connections can download that much in half a second. Just the text of this thread is probably more than 32 kB. If you can’t download that much data, you only technically have Internet service at all.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Even the slowest 3G connections can download that much in half a second.

            Even 3G is not always avaliable, even 3G sometimes slower than 2G.

            32 KB here, 32 KB there and boom - you have bitbucket.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              At least in the US, the reason 3G isn’t available is that it has been phased out, as has 2G. You may as well complain about how slow it is to send data with smoke signals, because 4G is table stakes for an internet-capable device now.

              • uis@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                US? US is wild place. A lot of people still on ADSL, but 2G and 3G equipment is thrown away and say “lol, you problem, buy new phone”. I won’t be surprised that there are a lot of places where internet is less stable than in a train going through tunnel under the mountain in the middle of Siberia. Which means no internet.

                I wonder what happens to internet connection in rural areas of USSA, since you suddenly started talking about it.

                In Europe(or at least in my part of Europe) there are places where mobile internet is overloaded like subway system and city center and places where mobile internet is very unstable like my house in suburban area and, agan, trains.

  • outerspace@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Better to run a whole generation , so like 30 years so people would start planning the upgrades ahead for when everyone is ready

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Antix is the last one standing on the support of old hardware, also gentoo Debian and tumbleweed is good ones since they support WIDE range of architectures

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not that hardware isn’t capable, it’s just manufacturer isn’t willing. Or rather willing to not.