“We need to identify each juror. Then make them miserable. Maybe even suicidal,” wrote another user on the same forum. “1,000,000 men (armed) need to go to washington and hang everyone. That’s the only solution,” wrote another user. “This s— is out of control.”

“I hope every juror is doxxed and they pay for what they have done,” another user wrote on Trump’s Truth Social platform Thursday. “May God strike them dead. We will on November 5th and they will pay!”

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah I’m not really comfortable with people just blowing this off as nothing more than people blowing smoke.

        It will absolutely escalate, I believe trump will absolutely straight up tell his followers to do something and they’ll fuckin do it.

  • Syrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    “May God strike them dead. We will on November 5th”

    …is a “win” missing or are they openly saying they’ll kill them on election day?

  • jobby@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Gosh! It’s lovely to see that they are such calm, reasonable and intelligent people.

    • yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, see- they already know that the votes to convict were miscounted. They are currently on a crusade to overthrow it 😅

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m glad the jurors have been smart enough to stay quiet. Now that the verdict is in, there is nothing keeping them from going public with details about their deliberations, but they seem to have all agreed it is best to keep out of the public eye. I wonder if the two lawyers purported to be on the jury advised them of that.

    Still, I wouldn’t be surprised if at least one of them already has an advance to write a book about it, which we will see eventuallty. I wonder if they get to keep their notes.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They absolutely should remain publicly silent until sentencing, personal safety aside. Publicly expressing opinions could be used in an appeal as argument for influencing the judge prior to sentencing.

      • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        On the flip side, the judge should absolutely use Trump violating his gag order to express his opinions about the case the those involved to impose prison time as part of his sentence.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      We really need better enforcement of laws on threatening civil servants.

      These jurors did a job that I might even struggle to take due to the likelihood of these assholes might fuck my life up. Imo, they should be given at least a year of Secret Service or US Marshall protection.

      I personally don’t trust the local PD to protect them.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m so fucking tired of seeing this quote constantly… but it’s inarguably a pervasive problem. I need this to stop being true so I don’t have to see it all the time.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          There will just be another quote from RATM to take its place. Been listening to them a lot lately - there are so damn many relevant quotes in their music…

          You’ll never get away! mwuhuhuhuh

        • butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I feel the same way about “every accusation is a confession.” It’s such over simplified, sixth grade mean girl bullshit. Buuuuuuut it hasn’t been wrong lately, which is annoying lol.

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Conservatives make up over 90% of police in the U.S. Conservatism should be a diaqualifier for positions of authority. It is unsafe to give such dangerous people power over others.

    • stanka@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Grizzled police-chief: get me those IP addresses

      Nerd: setting up the back-trace now, wait, the ip is 127.0.0.1

      Grizzled police-chief: don’t give me that geek-talk poindexter, speak english

      [Zoom in]

      Nerd: the post was coming from inside the station.

      [No one is shocked]

      fin.

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Here is the problem: These people very carefully choose their words. It’s not illegal to “wish” all the jurors are outed, tortured, maimed, and drawn and quartered over a bed of coals- along with their families, neighbors and first grade teachers.

      See that’s all okay to say apparently. This is our legal system. It’s not until tr they actually say, “I’m going to […],” that LE gets involved. Because none of that other stuff was a direct threat, or intended to incite violence, or intended to instill fear. It we’d just a harmless wish. Super okay, and nothing to worry about, you see?

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yes and no.

        There are no “magic words” that make a threat legal. It’s always a question of context.

        For example if Don Corleone came to your business and said “Nice place you got here, would be a shame if it burned down. By the way I happen to sell fire protection”, that would absolutely be illegal even though he never said he would do anything wrong. The intent is clear to all.

        So it doesn’t really matter if someone says “I wish that guy was dead!” vs “I’m going to kill that guy!” Either one can be an illegal true threat, or not, depending on the context.

        • Konala Koala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well, would that be the same as someone coming on here saying “Nice federated place you got here, would be a shame if it went down. By the way, I happen to see DDoS protection”?

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It could be the same, for example if you are talking to Whiterose. It’s always a question of context.

      • ZeroCool@vger.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Here is the problem: These people very carefully choose their words.

        This has not been my experience with Trump supporters on the internet. Ever.

        • credo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          This is exactly what they’ve done. Notice everything (except for “make them miserable”, which isn’t inherently illegal…) is placed on “someone else should…”:

          1,000,000 men (armed) need to […]

          I hope every juror is doxxed and they pay […]

          May God strike them dead.

          They know exactly what they are doing. Doing it mafia style, just like dear leader.

          • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yep, that’s how it tends to work.

            Until you start calling for people to directly start attacking people, then you are allowed freedom of speech.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Didn’t they arrest some little 4chan Nazi for saying he wanted to kill a cop in Minecraft? Turned out the trick didn’t work for him.

    • resin85@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s astonishing how quickly republicans have aligned to the behaviours of the Nazi party of the 1930s. They’re leveraging trump’s conviction exactly the same as the Nazis used the Reichstag fire to turn the power of the government against anyone opposed to them.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        They’ve been working towards that since the 1930s literally. They planned their own coup attempt largely in the image of Hitler’s 10 years after his beer hall putch. Wealthy American robber barons and elected fascist, I mean Republicans planned to overthrow FDR and replace him with a business/ fascist friendly dictator. Only to do even worse than him and get caught and humiliated still in the planning phase. As a result they took a step back and decided a slower approach would be better. And have spent the last century slowly cranking up the fascism. Till today when people are finally starting to realize nearly a century too late.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          They made the mistake of trying to recruit Smedley fucking Butler to their cause. That action alone speaks to the clear lack of intelligence behind the business plot.

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m upvoting both sides of this because it’s a discussion that ought to happen. Everybody please stop downvoting topical discussion that you disagree with.

      • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Why’s that? Because I’m not stupid enough, or in denial enough to see just how dangerous these people are? What, we’re supposed to sit around and laugh at them, and act like they’re nobody while they orchestrate another domestic terrorist attack?

          • watson387@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s exactly why we need to stop handling these pieces of shit with kid gloves. They are an active threat and they’re willing to resort to violence to install a fascist leader. It’s not just a difference of political opinion and we need to stop treating it like that’s all it is. These people are terrorists. It’s not if, but when their violence surfaces.

          • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            They’re talking about KILLING PEOPLE WHO ARE LIBERALS AND DEMOCRATS. We should absolutely NOT LEAVE THEM ALONE. They need to be treated like the terrorist filth they are and handled before innocent people get hurt.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              The rhetoric of essentially suggesting someone do a mass killing is not helpful no matter how toxic those fucks are. How can you not see that?

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  No you idiot. What the fuck is so hard about understanding being as bad as your enemy? I didn’t invent the concept.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  “I’m going to kill them before they kill me” is probably not the most ethical way to solve your problems.

  • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Conservatives are a threat to stable and peaceful societies. As long as we continue to pretend that conservatism is a valid political ideology and not psychopathy and sadism packaged up to look like politics, they’ll continue to undermine democracy and peace until they get the genocide(s) they keep clamoring for

    In the present research (N = 675), we focus on the relationship between the dark side of human personality and political orientation and extremism, respectively, in the course of a presidential election where the two candidates represent either left-wing or right-wing political policies. Narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and everyday sadism were associated with right-wing political orientation, whereas narcissism and psychopathy were associated with political extremism. Moreover, the relationships between personality and right-wing political orientation and extremism, respectively, were relatively independent from each other.

    We found eleven significant correlations between conservative [Moral Intuition Survey] judgments and the Dark Triad – [narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy,] all at significance level of p<.00001 – and no significant correlations between liberal [Moral Intuition Survey] judgments and the Dark Triad. We believe that these results raise provocative moral questions about the personality bases of moral judgments. In particular, we propose that because the Short-D3 measures three “dark and antisocial” personality traits, our results raise some prima facie worries about the moral justification of some conservative moral judgments

  • FleetingTit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Can someone please create an organization called “Pride Boys” and make them so popular that searching for “proud boys” on google will turn up images of rainbow flags and gay men?

  • SickofReddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I counter attack with, using their names to create an online fund raiser to make these reasonable people rich.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Imagine simping for this ugly, rich loser. I’d kind of get it if he was at least hot. Part of me thinks these simps are fake people that Trump and team created.

    • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Mostly fake, foundationally created by pootin to get his favorite puppet elected, and to foment civil war.

      And the uber-loser maga simps bought and jumped all in to racist christofascistlandia.