• QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Starting January 18, 1943—the midst of World War II—sliced bread was barred from American bakeries and homes. New baking regulations set by the Office of Price Administration had boosted flour prices, and the government wanted to prevent these costs from getting passed down to the consumer. By banning the use of expensive bread-slicing machines, the government was hoping bakeries could keep their prices low. Officials were also worried about the country’s supply of wax paper—and sliced bread required twice as much paraffin wrapping as an unsliced loaf. (It prevented the slices from drying prematurely.)

    • Stamau123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      So if your bakery already had the bread slicing machine then you were still good? Except not being allowed to use wax paper of course.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Wax paper is great! What I think is so funny about this is that to me wax paper feels more premium. I guess it’s because it’s because plastic is so ubiquitous that despite being an incredible and versatile material, it’s also ridiculously mundane.

      • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Your local neighborhood bakery almost certainly still uses wax paper instead of bags. I don’t eat much bread these days, but when I do I always just walk down to the bakery and pick out a loaf. It’s a million times better than the sugary stuff full of preservatives at the grocery store.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    In the UK, bakers were forbidden from selling bread on the day it was baked, in order to make it more stale and reduce demand.

      • athos77@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sadly, no:

        Bakers, bakeries and bakers shops were required by law only to sell their ‘national loaves’ when they were a day old because stale bread did not cut to waste like fresh bread. Source

        [If you can find it, the BBC Timeshift episode ‘Bread: A Loaf Affair’ mentions this along with a surprisingly interesting modern-ish history of bread in the UK. It’s narrated by Tom Baker.]

          • nelly_man@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            According to the Oxford English Dictionary, it means to cut in a wasteful manner, particularly in terms of fabric. From elsewhere, it looks like it’s also used in construction in regards to cutting material such that the remaining sections are not usable for other purposes.

            However, I’m not sure how stale bread discourages such cuts.

            • can@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Bing AI gave me this: "The phrase “did not cut to waste” in the context of bread rationing during wartime refers to the idea that stale bread, being firmer and less crumbly than fresh bread, could be sliced more thinly and evenly without falling apart or producing excess crumbs. "

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I see where ehe got his sens of humour at least. I’ll try to find that, thanks.