I wonder if this would actually deter would-be rapists or incentivize them to simply murder the child so they can’t talk.
Also, I think they might be surprised when these highly conservative legislative bodies execute their hometown pastors instead of drag queens.
There’s no evidence that capital punishment deters murder, so I’m not sure why it would deter rape.
I imagine there’s still a fair amount of theft in Saudi Arabia despite their cutting the hands off of thieves.
Justice systems where punishments can be meted out that are purely punitive are not especially just.
That assumes the it’s intended to be punishment. I would argue the goal of the laws, stated or not, is vengeance.
ETA: I’m not disagreeing with your statement. Just offering a modified viewpoint.
I think they might be surprised when these highly conservative legislative bodies execute their hometown pastors instead of drag queens.
These are the same people who want to classify being gay or trans or dressing in drag in front of children a sex crime.
I get the sentiment, but this is a pretty strawman argument.
Is it?
Oooooh….
Ooh 😞
It’s ok it’s only really been used like this before in a foreign country like 90 years ago…
Execution is not punishment, because the convicted person’s human experience ends.
Execution is not rehabiliatory, for the same obvious reason.
Execution is not preventative of the same person reoffending any more than imprisonment is.
Execution is not preventative of other people committing the same offense, because the act of execution is removed so completely in time and space from the crime and conviction. And it has to be so removed because of how completely wrong the justice system is kind of all the time.
Execution serves one purpose, and that is vengeance. The State should not be in the business of delivering vengeance to certain people.
Execution is to keep the person away from the rest of everyone else permanently. Your straw man reasons are hilarious tho.
To date, 21 people have been exonerated off death row by DNA evidence. The acceptable number of innocent people executed is 0.
Life imprisonment does exactly the same thing, is cheaper, and doesn’t run the risk of potentially killing an innocent person
We didn’t execute the prisoners on Guantanamo, supposedly the most dangerous terrorists in the world.
But we have to execute domestic criminals?
Execution is not preventative of the same person reoffending any more than imprisonment is.
You may have missed that part.
Execution also doesn’t reduce offense rates because the severity of punishment doesn’t factor into decision making above “life ruining if convicted” it’s the certainty of being caught that reduces rates. The uk used to hang pickpockets in the town square and you’d get your pockets picked if you stood there watching.
Not to mention, if you’re already going to go away for life just for rape, why not just kill the kid and dump the body in the woods too?
This is exactly what rapists who have been to prison often do because they don’t want to go back.
This just tells me, watching people die induces criminal behavior.
I’m against death penalty even for the most heinous crimes for several reasons but the main one being that you’ll never going to get a justice system that’s 100% accurate in their convictions. Jailing an innocent person is already awful enough but just imagine the sense of injustice when sitting on a death row for a crime you didn’t commit. This is an issue especially on cases that provoke strong emotional reactions on people. The default is to believe those accusations and defending yourself just makes one seem more guilty. The mere accusation of rape can already ruin a person’s life let alone when the victim is a child.
I sure hope no one gets really accused.
