• Trollception@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Steam is the 800 lb gorilla in the PC gaming sector. It sort of is the biggest offender as far as Poland’s argument is concerned.

      • exocrinous@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        According to the game sales industry, providing a useful service is anticompetitive behaviour, because you might steal customers from the platforms that are screwing everyone.

  • TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can see an argument for PSN and to a lesser degree Steam being anti-competitive. But from this article they seem to be implying a major point is them being digital markets pushing out “traditional” game sales, which sounds silly to me.

    • Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve never really understood the need to hold digital sales back to physical goods sales. It’s like complaining that Costco is cheaper because it skips the traditional store front.

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because any competition means anticompetitive behaviour doesn’t exist… Right?

        • unautrenom@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think the issue is the same as Apple being anti-competitive about the AppStore. Sure, techically, both Steam and the PSN are platforms for selling games, but they’re each restricted to specific non-overlapping platforms (respictively PC and PlayStation) where there they have a (near for Steam, absolute for PSN) monopoly. Hence, anticompetitive behavior.