The Verge published this spam article about the “best printers of 2024” to demonstrate how terrible Google’s search results are. It now appears as the top non-sponsored post if you search “best printer” on Google.

I love a good, informative troll.

  • Elias Griffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Best breadcrumb from article:

    I wanted to understand: what kind of human spends their days exploiting our dumbest impulses for traffic and profit? Who the hell are these [SEO/Google] people making money off of everyone else’s misery?

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t get ads in general. They don’t work. I never bought something that got presented to me from an ad because I know ads are deliberately lying to me, so the product they show is the first product I don’t consider purchasing.

      • AnagrammadiCodeina@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Time to time i watch twitch from an iPad that I use only for that and an ad banner appeared of a weird but useful adapter for USBC. I clicked on it on purpose (first ad I clicked in a decade probably) the link wasn’t working, dead link. I was speechless.

  • m0darn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think Google can be blamed too much for presenting an article from a relevant, generally trustworthy site, that has the search query as the article title.

  • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    yes i also noticed google search is absolute trash lately. so i switched to searx and life is better. i only go to google for street view and reverse image search now.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The next good search engine will unironically be a Microsoft chatbot of some kind

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You mean current Bing co-pilot?

      Bing has gotten so much worse in the last 5 years, it’s not even better than google anymore

      Search results aside, why can I no longer copy the result from Bing’s calculator anymore

      • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Lol, Copilot is easily the dumbest AI assistant. It’s completely useless, it just spews bullshit.

      • Lad@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I only ever knew Bing as being good for porn. Maybe a porn aficionado can confirm if it still is

        • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah Bing used to be lagging behind Google on censorship so you could find shit that Google wanted to hide once. Now, it all sucks.

  • AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This was actually a very funny read.

    Also yes, Brother printers are the best because they actually work.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      my only ask is that you make this article go viral by sharing it in faux-outrage that the EIC of The Verge has published an article partially generated by AI, because after the buttons I am going to include a bunch of AI-generated copy from Google’s Gemini in order to pad this thing out.

      Y’all mfs didn’t read the article lmao

  • frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In my recent experience, it recommends shitty blogs loaded with adverts and keywords. Most annoyingly, it always recommends Fandom’s Wiki above better alternative wiki sites. My DuckDuckGo experience has surprisingly been more useful.

    That aside, my Brother laser printer is still working great. No complaints.

    • rf_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What are better alternatives to fandom? I see the incumbents name get repeated more often than the alternative unfortunately.

      • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The problem is that fandom tends to vacuum up and supersede the smaller wikis, and the SEO bullshit just makes it happen even faster. The answer to your question unfortunately is “it depends on the game/show/fandom”.

    • UckyBon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      DDG tries very hard to push Amazon and Ebay to me. They’re not even available in my country 😅

        • UckyBon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t know why they would need my location/region. They’re already trying too hard to advertise stuff to me. Isn’t the internet like, international? Other search engines I never get that Ebay/Amazon stuff, it’s a DDG feature for whatever IP I get.

    • Pechente@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      My DuckDuckGo experience has surprisingly been more useful.

      Yeah, right!? I remember that one or two years ago DDG was consistently worse than Google but recently Google’s quality has dropped off a cliff. Now when I don’t get the desired result in DDG and switch to Google, the results are usually just as bad or worse.

      • Opisek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yup. I constantly found myself appending !g for important queries that I needed an answer for right then and now. Google has stopped providing that commodity. It’s almost never worth it anymore to fall back to Google.

      • smort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The only time google gets me better results than DDG now is if I have a really vague question, like “movie where the guy wears a trash bag on his leg and has a piña colada on the train to Milwaukee”

          • ignism@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Could you elaborate? You’re saying you’re going to google for programming issues, but at the same time devs don’t do SEO?

            • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Sure. What I mean is that when I search for issues in duck duck go, I don’t see relevant results. But then I put “!g” and what I want (usually stack overflow or GitHub) comes to the top.

              So it makes sense that programming sites do tags and keywords properly to optimize things for the user instead of trying promote their site no matter what.

              At least that’s my guess anyway.

              • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Stack overflow has been one of the consistently reliable googleable sites for decades.

                It’s a shame Quora has strayed so far from their initial cloning of SO’s site. It seems to be turning into AskYahoo 2 fast from the results I’ve seen lately.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most annoyingly, it always recommends Fandom’s Wiki above better alternative wiki sites.

      use Indie Wiki Buddy extension to get rid of fandom.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you have any tips or tricks for DDG please do share! I’m definitely getting better overall results there, but the local ones can still be a bit rough.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My DDG searches have been absolute garbage for the past few months. About 75% of the time I have to re-search my keywords on Google to actually get a relevant result.

      It’s bad enough that I’m about to switch back to Google.

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s not been my experience. I’ve been using DDG for years, and when I first switched I would occasionally have to go find something on Google instead. That slowly fell off as the years went by because going to Google and getting better search results became rarer and rarer. It’s to the point now where I don’t even do it, unless I need to look at something on street view.

        • makyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I second this, this has been my experience exactly. It’s gotten so bad that not only do I not need the Google fallback, but I’m starting to feel like the DDG results are better than the Google ones in the first place.

          • Opisek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Better than Google now, but still not better than Google back then. It my experience at least.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It depends on what your searching. For me programming questions are way better on google.

        Also searching obvious questions like a country’s population, google still does its job there too.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I deleted their app and moved search engines, they got shit quick. So bad at their main usp. I was constantly fed hyper local results, local even with location off. And dont get me started on how bad it was for porn.

      • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Try Startpage. I have just started using it so I can’t tell you how it compares. I also need to look up who owns it. But I have been told it has the same privacy qualities of DDG.

        • frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I used to like it, but there was one incident where it fed me links to phishing sites. Like all the results were malicious. I suspect they had an internal breach or the session was somehow hijacked. That was years ago, but it made me wary. It’s usually okay.

          • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Good to know I haven’t fully switched yet. I am definitely going to look more closely at its parents company and where it has servers.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh my god the Fandom wiki for minecraft uses the same little tab icon as the actual minecraft wiki but it has a fucking “are you an adult or child” popup EVERY SINGLE TIME a page loads

      I hate it so much

    • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Use breezewiki extension. Redirects fandom articles to a frontend that removes their bullshit and replaces fandom with independant wikis when possible.

    • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It has a partnership with bing. So sadly now it is mostly a bing clone. I have been using DDG for a decade. I noticed a distinct drop in search quality after the bing partnership.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If I’m looking up something general, like some actor or tv show, then DDG is perfect. If im troubleshooting some weird software issue then i find it doesnt always list as many results, as if it hasnt indexed as many sites.

      DDG at least now means I can search random shit without it suddenly being inserted into my social media algorithms like some kind of psychological torture.

  • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Kagi

    Paying for search aligns incentives better than free search.

    It’s also the best results from a search engine I’ve had in a decade.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Theoretically, sure, but I’m not paying what they’re asking. $10/month for unlimited searches is ridiculous, and $5 is still unpalatable even if it was unlimited (which it’s not).

      I’d pay if it was something like $1-2/month for 500+ searches.

  • weew@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Strange how Google became the default search engine back in the day because they were so good at filtering out the dumb websites that just spam search terms all over the page.

    They’ve regressed and become Yahoo

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Except there isn’t much of a Google stealing their thunder. Bing isn’t better. DDG isn’t better.

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        To be fair when Google solved SEO spam in 1999, thanks to pagerank, it was no small feat. The others were bad not because they abused ads but because they didn’t know how to deal with cheating webmasters.

        • sanguinet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve found DDG to be adequate for the majority of things I search, but when I need something specific or with some nuance, it fails miserably. For that reason I still use Google when I do stuff for work, or when I do troubleshooting. For my daily usage DDG is just fine, though.

      • Kyouki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Personally really like ddg over it though. Only gotta be more precise with keywording for finding what you need.

        • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I use DDG but i do wonder what i dont see sometimes.
          I often google a specific brand of components at work and even with the exact brand and/or part number in the search it sometimes doesnt turn up any results (say 5-7 random unrelated webpages) and thats it. Then i put the same search in google and bam, top result.

          • Kyouki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s what I said - the right key wording. It’s pretty strict, whereas Google’s results sometimes are a tiny bit more loose understanding of what you roughly mean. Though not always, and on Google I found myself often just adding “Reddit” for specifics. Though really really depends on what you search.

            For me DDG offers a lot more than just search results, the bangs and features like I added a script to directly port my questions to some AI is really useful.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Quotes help. So "model" "part number" since those force them to be in the results. DDG likes to ignore parts of your query to get more results.

                • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  “DDG likes to ignore parts of your query to get more results.”

                  Wow sounds extremely useful and like a feature I want. I love searching for something specific and they are like “did you mean totally unrelated thing?”

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think it takes a while for that kind of competitor to emerge and gain enough traction to become a genuine alternative option. The primary option everyone long since adopted kinda has to suck for a while :/

        • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          DDG has been around for quite a while. Now it was a few years ago I used it last time, but the reason I switched back to Google was because I was clearly less productive with DDG.

          • Cris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t think something like duckduckgo is gonna be the eventual contender to take on google. I think it’ll have to be an engine with its own index or some kind of lateral solution.

            Something like brave, kagi, qwant, or stract could maybe turn into something exciting with more momentum, but honestly I have a hard time seeing them be the kind of scrappy competitor with a new approach that unseats the old king who has lost their way in pursuit of more profit at the expense of product quality. None of them seem like they truly have a new approach, but only time will tell how that story plays out this time.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It also is going to take another leap in algorithm.

          It was a hard problem to solve when Google’s founders cracked it, but it’s an even harder problem to solve now that you have state of the art spam bots filling the Internet full of shit that looks like it was composed by humans.

          If someone cracks how to figure out whether something is ai or not (for real, not the fake solutions we have now) and adds that to a good search algorithm and filters the fake shit by default, they will have a hell of a product on their hands.

          • Hypx@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m of the opinion that it will require human interaction to fix this. It can’t be solved via algorithms.

            What people don’t realize is that the original Google search algorithm, PageRank, effectively looks at how real humans interacted with the websites they were indexing. Only websites referenced by other websites were being considered by Google’s search engine. This gave them a real advantage over other, purely algorithmic search engines.

            Something like this will have to be recreated. We will have to figure out a way of prioritizing search results that real human beings have found to be useful.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Reddit used to be better, but now any time you search for advice on good _____ to buy, the only answers you can find are “use the search function, this question has been answered already”

        • duffman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          That was my issue with old school SymForums. I don’t see that so much on reddit.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Are they actually recommending the Reddit search function? We shit on their internal search function for over a decade, and told people to just use Google and site:Reddit in the search.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve noticed half the subs are now marked as “NSFW” when searching for something like a plumbing issue for example, which won’t allow you to see the posts without using the reddit app.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Use old.reddit as long as you’re able to. Don’t even need to log in (at least where I live), you just hit the “I’m 18” button

            • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I do (and did when I was still there) use it on a desktop but on a phone it directs you to the terrible mobile site where the HVAC and plumbing subreddits are somehow NSFW and restricted. Maybe next time I’ll try to manually redirect to old.reddit and see if it works.

      • kronisk @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m starting to feel like a shill because I say this so often, but Kagi is the only one I’ve found that actually does the job anymore. To me a search engine that works is worth the small cost each month, but unfortunately I don’t see paying for search becoming mainstream anytime soon.

        • GbyBE@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I was sceptical at first too, but a not-paid-for search engine will either have ads, paid results or try to monetize the search data in some way. I feel it helps me find what I need, better than the alternatives I tried, and I like the features and configuration options it has.

        • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m almost convinced that Kagi comments on Lemmy are spam. Please prove me wrong:

          Has anyone here tried Kagi because of a recommendation from here and, well, actually found it better than the rest?

          • im sorry i broke the code@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I did lol, why the hell would I recommend it otherwise?

            It’s a search engine, so to be better than the others it’s obvious it would have to return better results than the usual ad-based crap — and it does. There is a free trial and you can check out if it’s worth it for you btw

            It has quite a lot of QoL features for searches, but their main one — searching — is worth the cost; if you do a search once in a blue moon or append “Reddit” at the end of a query, it’s not imo since any search engine is “good enough” for that. If you instead actually do a search without having a specific website in mind, it’s good. You can also filter out the quora and other shitty websites results, which is nice

            • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I did lol, why the hell would I recommend it otherwise?

              Not directly saying that you’re doing this, but c’mon, you know the answer. Why would anyone recommend a paid product?

              There is a free trial and you can check out if it’s worth it for you btw

              Nice! I didn’t know there was a trial. Good to know.

              You can also filter out the quora and other shitty websites results, which is nice

              Oh, now we’re talking!! That’s very cool.

          • Mkengine@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I use it, but to be honest I did not do a comprehensive comparison. I like it mostly for the fine grained website control. For work and some personal stuff I often look for code and can push websites like GitHub to appear more often. Or I can block Pinterest in my search results. I tried to do this in SearXNG, but this was too much of a hassle so in a way I pay kagi for convenience. I recently got a new job and will evaluate in the coming months if it is still worth the money, but right now I am satisfied. Nobody else I know would pay for a search engine, so I can understand the stance, but I am really fed up with all the advertising and enshitification so I thought why not give it a try. And yes, because it was recommended here.

            • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Thank you for your insight. Much better than the usual, “oh yeah, Kagi is good. All praise Kagi!”

              Your account makes it sound very appealing, so I’ll check Kagi out more closely.

          • jmanes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I didn’t get recommended it here, but elsewhere. I ended up paying for a years worth last year and yeah I like it better than pretty much everything else. There is still a rare occasion that I need to use Google, but that is maybe once a week whereas with DuckDuckGo it was multiple times per-day.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not sure if you read the recent article or not, but the guy responsible for this enshittification came from Yahoo, where he applied the same policies. So you’re more literally correct than you may think

  • figaro@lemdro.id
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    For the record though, I used bing for the duration of 2023, sort of as an experiment to use the ai assistant.

    Bing search is worse that Google by a long shot. I almost always gave up and used Google.

    • mPony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      well, that was last year, right?
      I wouldn’t bet on Bing search results having gotten better since then, but I would bet on Google search results having gotten worse since then.

    • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      In my experience that’s only been true if you’re letting Google track you post-2020-ish. If you Google via tor or a VPN with no history so Google has no data about you, the results are trash, where Bing/DuckDuckGo (which is just Bing sans non-MS trackers) results are slightly better (although still much worse than Google before it sucked).

    • Goodie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Honestly, I think almost everything else is worse than Google.

      I set my default to duck duck go, and it’s getting better, but I still fall back on google with some regularity

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I see a lot of my friends actually use Bing through ChatGPT, and they seem to get better results than Google. That might be what Microsoft is actually optimizing Bing for

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    It’s been over a year since I last told you to just buy a Brother laser printer, and that article has fallen down the list of Google search results because I haven’t spent my time loading it up with fake updates every so often to gain the attention of the Google search robot.

    Pointing out that incentive structure and the culture that’s developed around it seems to make a lot of people mad, which is also interesting!

    Both of them have reliably printed return labels and random forms and pictures for my kid to color for years now, and I have never purchased replacement toner for either one.

    Neither has fallen off the WiFi or insisted I sign up for an ink-related hostage situation or required me to consider the ongoing schemes of HP executives who seem determined to make people hate a legendary brand with straightforward cash grabs and weird DRM ideas.

    Don’t feel compelled to do it; my only ask is that you make this article go viral by sharing it in faux-outrage that the EIC of The Verge has published an article partially generated by AI, because after the buttons I am going to include a bunch of AI-generated copy from Google’s Gemini in order to pad this thing out.

    Brother laser printers are strong contenders, especially for black and white printing needs, but weigh the pros and cons against other options like inkjets before deciding.


    The original article contains 428 words, the summary contains 239 words. Saved 44%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And by making the search engine worse and worse, they open the opportunity to bring AI chat as a “savior”, and people will think it revolutionized internet search.

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Zitron, though, describes him as “a computer scientist class traitor who sided with the management consultancy sect.”

      Based

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Missing the days of Consumer Reports. I think the velocity of new products is too high for them to be relevant for more than a few months once they release a report anymore.

    • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And Wirecutter used to be good but they will occasionally point out how highly rated something is, and cross checking against falespot et al indicates a lot of fake reviews.

    • CaptSneeze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I still sign up with them when I’m researching bigger, or long-lasting, purchases. Cars, washing machine, and that sort of thing. I’m always a little annoyed at the price, but the content is SO MUCH better than any other online review source that I’m always happy with my decision in the end. Reddit comments are probably second, but I’ve found those to be littered with what seem to me to be suspiciously positive reviews for items that are not significantly better than their competition. I feel like I need to dial up my critical nature to 10 to fight against the echo chamber and/or the covert advertising.

      • nucleative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I saw a website that was selling Reddit bot services to companies that want to review their products. They would just send a swarm of bad accounts in there and make nice comments. Even replying to their own comments.

        After that I stopped trusting almost every Reddit review (⁠╯⁠°⁠□⁠°⁠)⁠╯⁠︵⁠ ⁠┻⁠━⁠┻

        *Edit: meant to say bot accounts but leaving it