People in comments of this post pointed out coloring your face black is racist.
May I ask you Americans why is coloring your face considered racist?
Coming from Europe, I personally do not see anything wrong with trying to color (in any color) your face to match any other race.
I believe is should be normal to color our faces in any color. Is it also racist if black person would color their face in other skin tones? Why? Also interesting thought: What about tanning yourself?
Or is it for some reason not ok to acknowledge people have different skin tones? Of course you do not do it out of disrespect, racism, etc. But out of acknowledging character you are trying to represent looks different than you.
I also noticed people pretend to not see differences in skin tones. What is up with that? I thought racism meant to hate or disrespect people of different races. But why is coloring your face considered disrespectful?
Maybe this image itself has racist background I do not understand, but I would like to know answers to my questions in general, since American culture has quit influence on quite a large chunk of our globe.
I’ll take “questions that are never asked in good faith” Alex!
Not everyone is western.
Yes. How did you know. 🤦♂️ I genuinely wanted to know why is this act considered racist. And got explained very well in the comments - no thanks to you.
European here, also don’t understand what’s wrong with that picturr.
European here, I do understand whats wrong with the picture and Im very sorry.
Good for you. Or something…
I wouldn’t say that’s an american thing, plenty of politicians in Europe had blackface scandals in the last couple of decades and every year, the topic also comes up around Christmas (NL) and Three Kings Parades (ES).
Edit less snarky and corrected some info
I used word “personally”. I just added European for a context. I know a lot of Europeans know a lot of stuff. I myself just do not know a lot of stuff.
(And yes I know I could probably express myself better. I have never been good with English.)
I knew it is considered racist - and would be considered racist also in Europe. I just did not know why. I believed reason for it being racist came from american history. This is why I asked Americans.
I have encountered this “American social issues transplanted” hand waving a lot in Europe. For example, I know a lot of Swedes who say this about a bunch of casually racist stuff (proclaiming Sweden to be very anti-racist). Meanwhile up north you see a lot of Classic American cars which are often casually emblazoned with Confederate flags and even displayed in proximity to Nazi memorabilia. Down south you have a rising right-wing party support fuelled by fear of immigrants from Africa/Middle East (eg. The non-white ones).
I understand you’re trying to educate yourself and that’s great, don’t take this as dunking on you more, as I feel like you’re in the smart minority by trying to learn and reason. It just really bugs me when I hear people say it’s a US problem. A lot of Europe is holding a lot of racist views (and in a lot of cases, horrific colonial history) and then turn around to say things like “why are my football players kneeling, BLM is an American issue”.
In Europe it’s racist if it’s offensive to black people
In the US it’s racist if white people can pretend to be offended by it to feed their desire for attention
😂😂
Nahh… May be true in other cases (in extremes you have everything). But not in this case. As have others explained due to historical use of this act, the act itself is offensive.
Like using swastika as an ancient symbol of sun. People will perceive it as nazi symbol no matter what are your intentions.
Not an American, I would guess that blackface in particular looks more like a roughly made mock. And then I can see why mocking others based on skin colour can be seen as racist.
I would say that tanning usually looks more natural (even in failed cases), that’s why it would not be seen as racism, in worst case it would look like a person made a laughing stock of themselves in case of poorly applied tanner.
Then again, it is still just a guess, as I am not from the US
A couple links that’ll help:
Tl;Dr: blackface has an extremely racist history in the US and is almost universally frowned on, even if you’re doing it out of genuine admiration for a black person.
Well thank you! I can see there is much more to it than just “coloring your face to match skin tone of character you are trying to represent”. The coloring itself has been historically used as a racist act.
So I get it now. My question now reads as “What is wrong with swastika - old symbol for sun” or something like that.
Once again, context. But depending on your audience, they may not know of any other context except the bad one. So while your intentions have nothing to do with what they perceive, it won’t matter.
There are some things that had a big negative impact in an isolated area and isolated point on our timeline, enough so things become stained.
Travelling internationally, you have to be aware of a culture’s history. Some things totally normal are very not normal in specific places and people of the world. I’ve learnt this as an Australian abroad. Many times I’ve learned something I couldn’t even imagine could be a thing, but fortunately most people make you aware first—assuming it happens a lot with trabellers—or have seen my face confused and then drop as it’s explained to me. People are generally very nice after a, “I’m so sorry. And thank you, I’ll make sure I remember that.”
@hostops and @MossyFeathers it’s so refreshing to read a sane sensible exchange on this subject for a change. Kudos to you both.
Thank you! That helped a lot to expand knowledge of my ignorant ass :)
Because of minstrel shows. These were only really in America, so it’s not part of European culture.
It wasn’t just minstrel shows, and the UK contributed, but for the most part you’re correct.
Same here! And I have the exact same questions as you. I can’t see why that’s racist or disrespectful, but I’d like to hear other points of view.
When your grandparents were young, racism was still considered somewhat normal. And in cartoons, popular media, etc… there was a particular depiction of people with a dark skin tone that was used in a derogatory manner.
Recreating this appearance on someone’s face was later termed “blackface”. And less complete variants of it are still considered offensive by some.
I can’t place myself in that perspective, but I think I’m lucky not to have been part of that culture.
People are very sensitive to historic portrayals of black and coloured people by white people. Seemingly, it was done years ago by racists so doing it now is associated with that even if it’s not meant in bad faith any longer.
It may be similar to dressing up in Germany as a Nazi in public. You’re likely to get some people upset about it even if you had good intentions.
In addition to the other comments, we should note that the photo in question is referencing the OJ Simpson murder case, a very high profile and racially charged trial among the public in the U.S.
In the US, there is a history of white performers using blackface to play caricatures of black people, leaning hard on racist ethnic stereotypes. From Wikipedia:
The minstrel show, also called minstrelsy, was an American form of theater developed in the early 19th century.[1] The shows were performed by mostly white actors wearing blackface makeup for the purpose of comically portraying racial stereotypes of African Americans. There were also some African-American performers and black-only minstrel groups that formed and toured. Minstrel shows stereotyped blacks as dimwitted, lazy, buffoonish, cowardly, superstitious, and happy-go-lucky.[2][3] Each show consisted of comic skits, variety acts, dancing, and music performances that depicted people specifically of African descent.
Yup this is the answer. In the past people had put on black makeup and did horribly awful racist caricatures of black people. As a result putting on black makeup itself came to mean you’re doing racist stuff. IMO i think that far in the future if racism is eliminated then people will be able to put on dark makeup and it’ll be seen as fine. But none of us reading this sentence are gonna be alive to see that point
It’s racist because it’s racist. It has historically been used in a racist manner, and that’s socially recognized. So, if you do it now, it’s interpreted as racist.
(Much like the swastika is a hate symbol because the swastika is a hate symbol. It has been used as such and now it’s socially recognized as such (even though there’s nothing inherently bad about a bunch of geometric lines (and, in fact, was a positive symbol for the first 5,000 years of its use)).)
Let’s reclaim it then, use both Swastikas and blackface as positive symbols. Continuing to refrain from them because you think someone might interpret it the wrong way does nothing to normalise them again, if that is a long-term goal.
The swastika is still a positive symbol in Asia. In northern India for example: https://vajiramias.com/current-affairs/project-swastik/5e76ddb61d5def05d74372f2/
Imo cuz people are too PC (Politically Correct) buthurt lately.
I’d even flip the tables, and call it racist if you won’t allow other races to dress up / admire your own race.
Ofc doing it to make fun / be a dick about other races is not okay.
I believe it is very well explained in the comments.
Blackface being incredibly racist is not because we are too PC.
Imagine white people calling a black woman racist for dressing up like Marilyn Monroe, that’s bs.
Or black people calling a white child racist for wanting to dress up like Martin Luther King, since the child sees him as a hero of the past.
It all comes down to your acts when you’re dressed up, or the people you dress up as.
Those can be either offensive,
or innocent.
