• orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Did we actually believe any of them at the time? I think they already knew that remote work was going to continue, and they were trying to get as much money out of the transition as possible.

    One problem was that they had wasted real estate, and they had to justify it to shareholders. So they pretended that they were going to bring everyone back to the office.

    If you think about it from a medium run perspective, of course employers are going to want more remote work because then they don’t have to pay for utilities or parking or rent or buildings. Of course this depends on the exact setup, but for many businesses it was clear from the beginning of the pandemic where things were going to go. And if we want to get even more cynical, we can point out that when your labor pool spans the country or even the world, you have a greater ability to underpay employees.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They want remote work so they can get the cheapest labor. Be on guard for average salaries to start dropping.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you can do your job from home and your job can be taught under 5 years. Then 5 indians guys can do it together for 10 times less total than you cost. And that will be the case until what happenned to China happens to India, which should take roughly 40 years.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          We found this to be NOT true. Half, at best. But wait.

          So it’s 1/10 in its heyday, but when you pay someone 1/10th salary in a land of 1/50th salary, that person becomes a target. They look comparatively rich, their house gets repaired, their kids show the signs of an economic bump, etc. So now your guy can get robbed or kidnapped, so you need a driver and protection. And the kids need to go to a different school with a gate. And the spouse needs to get back and forth safely. And then a better house, moving to a gated community or apartment, with more guards. And suddenly you’re paying for company housing, schooling, cars, drivers, tutors, guards, cameras/surveillance, cooks, maids, deliveries, and even extended family is moving in for safety.

          So it’s still a bargain on paper, but then it’s just half. They don’t mention this because it’s hard to sell an idea when 80% of it is eroded.

          Your employee or team now works on the other side of the world, with a different culture and management style from what you’re used to with Americans, different communications and workflow, and everything’s still around the world so it’s a day’s delay for everything.

          The culture and work environment has trained some regions to NEVER admit they don’t know something; just nod, smile, and try to figure it out with confidence. Dunning-kruger be damned, sometimes that’s not a good way to do something in my field, which is incredibly technical. We can’t even educate the locals on risks of bad supply chains (curl|sh anyone? Flatpacks and CPAN and NPM and composer? Find out why these are risks) and doing so with the different “never say you don’t understand or you’re fired” environment is an added challenge. “Did you check for compliance?” will only ever get a “Yes”, even if you don’t mention which standard.

          So your management - especially in offshores - needs an entirely different mindset and workflow, and you need to have people to check on the compliance and readiness and completeness who will say when it’s not ready because they’re not gonna be fired for it. This kind of thing surprised us and it will surprise the "I just wanna save money and this guy said 1/10th! " crowd. It’s not “you get what you pay for”, so don’t misunderstand; it’s just different. And if you can cope with all the differences and don’t freak out that you’re not saving so much for same-same work, it’s … an idea. In my case, the offshored staff slowly shrunk until we moved the offshoring to Poland.

  • masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Defeated Mildly annoyed CEOs are now conceding hybrid working is here to stay

    FTFT.

    They have their wealth and their heads are still attached to their necks - there is nothing “defeated” about them.

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah but we wanted to work from home not hybrid bullshit. This story is pandering like we won but they are still forcing me to go to an office every week for no good reason. This is just propaganda. The whole conversation in the thread has even shifted from talking about working at home full time to hybrid being ok. Insane

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Going to the office once a week is one thing the Indian guys can’t do. Love it don’t fight it, unless you have a workable solution to end capitalism or globalism.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Going to the office once a week is one thing the Indian guys can’t do. Love it don’t fight it, unless you have a workable solution to end capitalism or globalism.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Going to the office once a week is one thing the Indian guys can’t do. Love it don’t fight it, unless you have a workable solution to end capitalism or globalism.

    • mPony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      hear hear. Offices are outmoded, office managers are outmoded, paying for parking is outmoded.

      All of it is horseshit, and like horseshit should be deposited indiscriminately and walked away from without looking back.

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know why you think that’s all propaganda, i personally like hybrid work a lot more as well. I like my office, i like being able to go for a coffee with my colleagues and so on. I do like working from home as well - but i’m totally okay with being 1-2 days in the office. However, we do have people working 90% from home - they have to come in to the office though for various things they have to do. Printing large format plans, etc, etc. You can’t just assume 100% home full time works for everyone and shift the goalpost.

      • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think it should be a choice not 100% at all. I’m personally upset because I was told it was ok to be fully remote so I adjusted my life then once it wasn’t convenient for my company anymore they changed the rules on me and everyone else and gaslighted us all about the real reason.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Going to the office once a week is one thing the Indian guys can’t do. Love it don’t fight it, unless you have a workable solution to end capitalism or globalism.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeah but we wanted to work from home not hybrid bullshit. This story is pandering like we won but they are still forcing me to go to an office every week for no good reason. This is just propaganda. The whole conversation in the thread has even shifted from talking about working at home full time to hybrid being ok. Insane

      The comment I’m replying to needs to be upvoted much more than it is.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Worked for a multinational where they pushed their shared services centre into a 3 day/week RTO from fully remote, thinking this would improve things. It only exacerbated the staff turnover rate which at its peak hit 95% in some departments (I worked in Accounts Payable.)

    When strategies like lengthening contractual notice periods, buying pizza on crunch weeks, extending RTO further and even a payrise (that was still below market rate) didn’t work… They outsourced hundreds of jobs to India and laid tonnes of people off.

    I escaped redundancy and went into a higher commercial finance role (internally) with a considerable pay rise. It’s almost fully remote. The culture shock is baffling.

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are a lot of great ones in here, but there’s another perspective I think should be added. For a long time, employees have been commoditized. We’re resources. Interchangeable. And that gives companies tremendous power.

    WFH puts us on more even footing. There are entire cities supported by a single industry or even company. Now we aren’t limited geographically in who we can work for. If you’re toxic to work for, we can leave. It saps the power of the leadership to say “my way or the highway.”

    I don’t think this is the secret underlying reason. I agree it’s real estate values that are mainly driving it, but I think this is absolutely part of it. Toxic leaders (and every company has them) are finding people are less willing to tolerate their bullshit because they aren’t over a barrel to the same degree. Still need universal healthcare to really break their back.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah for quite some time I have been saying labor is priced artificially low. All of the barriers to finding a new job while working. All the risks of even short-term unemployment. Workers are already fucked by the power imbalance but without any liquidity in the labor market it’s so much worse. WFH adds liquidity, they hate it.

  • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    A smart CEO can downsize the office space and save money, thereby increasing his profits.

    • Mikelius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The problem is they signed long office space leases and breaking out of them is very expensive, plus they get tax breaks for driving foot traffic to commercial areas. Not that they would ever admit that is the reason instead if a bullshit “team spirit” diatribe excuse.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Our company is doing the opposite and forcing everyone to RTW 5-days a week. Can’t wait for the exodus and the “I told you so”

  • MakePorkGreatAgain@lemmy.basedcount.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    the place I work has tried RTO policies several times now - with very limited success. well over 90% of all white collar jobs can be done from wherever you can get internet so your VPN software will function. the customer facing part of the business has to be there 100% of the time, they dont have a choice, that’s how the business model is designed. I go in a few days a week but honestly dont ever actually need to be there. maybe 2 days a month, tops, is my presence absolutely required.

    the really interesting bit, which the article didnt touch on (not much of an article to begin with) is that there is a commercial real-estate bubble. the big buildings in the downtown business district/cores of most cities, that real-estate isnt worth much if there’s no one renting the space. businesses that used to rent the space no longer need to because all of their employees work from home now. the people who invested in those big buildings are not seeing a return on their investments - and they are unhappy. that is, imho, a big driver behind the RTO movement.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      the people who invested in those big buildings are not seeing a return on their investments - and they are unhappy. that is, imho, a big driver behind the RTO movement.

      And those people are largely of the same class as the corporate executives and shareholders pushing RTO policies which ties a nice little bow on top of the whole situation. Rich people are losing money when employees work from home and so WFH has to go.

      • OpenStars@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Those two are not as related as they at first seem.

        For one, the plumbing required is different, as in literally offices don’t tend to have bathrooms with toilets and showers inside every office space. Also the lighting would be cut off for all the inside units. Communal bathrooms and no windows works for work but not as good for home.

        For another, a lot of the varying housing crises (there are multiple types) relate to affordability bc of being bought up by corporate interests. Another type relates to weird zoning laws of what types of homes are allowed to be built in certain areas - and for these at least, there’s nothing stopping good homes from being made except again profits.

        So it’s not impossible, but there are challenges. Mainly, how can already rich people find a way to make even moar monay? Oh yeah and something something the poors get whatever too.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Those residential units will be worthless too if all the offices close. Why live in the big city and pay huge rents if you work remote? Just move to a cheap area and buy a nice house.

        • vividspecter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Those huge rents exist because demand exceeds supply (amongst other reasons). People want to live in walkable neighborhoods and not suburbs where you have to drive everywhere to survive.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Unfortunately only like 10% of them are viable for conversion. Office buildings and residential buildings have very different needs and it’s expensive as fuck to add all the extra shit needed for residences.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I would love to see an actual study proving it’s possible for only 10% of them because I’ve lived in a building built like an office one and I’ve done renovations in it and there’s very little that’s different from a residential building with concrete floors once everything’s been stripped down.

          It’s even more expensive as fuck to build a residential building of the size of those office buildings as well and once converted is guaranteed income forever, no pandemic stops people from living in it and there’s always people willing to rent, contrary to businesses that can change their policies or simply go bankrupt.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              An economist…

              Get me an engineer’s or architect’s opinion and then I will give it some credibility.

              • errer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                I mean, you’re welcome to provide a source refuting mine from an engineer or an architect. I provided my source, where’s yours?

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  That’s what I’m saying, your source is from someone in a field unrelated to the one responsible to make the modifications, that’s like if you just gave me a quote by a geographer as a source for something related to computer science. The responsibility of finding a credible source for your number is still on you.

  • zkeesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    defeated broke millennial more disaffected for not being able to get past article paywall :(

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It seems like they pushed and there was nothing there to push because everyone had left. This is a case where the worker had options and it’s nice to see them use that to their advantage and encourage changes.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I offered to work from home yesterday because I have bronchitis and no voice, so I told my manager it was that or I go off sick and stay there until I deem I feel better, that half a loaf was better than none, and she said “well I don’t want to set a precedent”, so I told her that I was sick then and won’t be back until I feel better. I’m the only one who can do my job, so she’s right fucked. She’s like an alien wearing a skin suit trying to pretend to human.

    • Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The manager doesn’t get to make the decision. She’s probably going to have to go argue with her manager that also likely has no control. Stand your ground, they don’t want to fight on this hill. -source, a people manager of hybrid teams at a company that insisted on on-site.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve had a personal policy of not working from home when I’m sick, even before the pan. I want solid recovery time because experience has taught me that doing anything else just keeps me sick longer. Take all the time you need, even if you only need it a little bit but could otherwise power through. She put herself and you in this situation. Reap all the recovery time needed to return at 100%.

      • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        She has understaffed us to a criminal degree all because she gets a bonus if she comes in under budget. You are correct, I will take all the time I need. I had to go to urgent care last night for a nebulizer so I’m definitely still not well, it’s actually resolving pneumonia it turns out.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      “I don’t want anyone to realize they can work just as effectively from home. Sure it saves them gas and commute time, but it just doesn’t pump my ego if I cannot micromanage in person.”

  • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    In other news…

    “we lied and tried to force RTO because we wanted people to quit so we could avoid the bad-press of layoffs. They didn’t quit, we had to do layoffs to keep the stock price up because as a ceo I’m paid in shares. We’re done the layoffs for now and we enjoy skipping out on rent for office space.”

  • RalphFurley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    My wife works in a large suburban office park off a major highway. The company designs hardware so obviously they have people in the workshop on-site etc, but you could remove three of their office buildings and keep those people at home. She also flies out from the east coast to the west coast twice a year just to sit in a conference room for two days straight… it’s like no one has ever heard of Zoom.

    I’ve been working from home for nearly a decade and a half now. It has enabled me to keep my job after moving halfway across the country. I have dinner ready when the wife and kids get home, the laundry done, and can go for a jog at the local park for a few laps when I want to and yet I still get shit done and do a great job.

    It just absolutely baffles me that CEOs aren’t chomping at the bit to downsize their office space footprints, get off those leases or sell off their properties, and let everyone work from home.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I have dinner ready when the wife and kids get home, the laundry done, and can go for a jog at the local park for a few laps when I want to and yet I still get shit done and do a great job.

      You are so much more not-lazy than I am. Going for a jog after work? I salute you.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    ITT people with drastically different ideas of what hybrid is.

    Why do I feel like the next phase of this is changing the expectations of hybrid to be more like “9 in the office, 1 day from home”