• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289624000254?via%3Dihub

    The original study:

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289624000254?via%3Dihub

    Main points:

    Within-families, intelligence predict left-wing beliefs.
    
    
    DNA-based predictors of IQ also predict political beliefs within families.
    
    
    Our results imply that being genetically predisposed to be smarter causes left-wing beliefs.
    

    Abstract:

    Intelligence is correlated with a range of left-wing and liberal political beliefs. This may suggest intelligence directly alters our political views. Alternatively, the association may be confounded or mediated by socioeconomic and environmental factors. We studied the effect of intelligence within a sample of over 300 biological and adoptive families, using both measured IQ and polygenic scores for cognitive performance and educational attainment. We found both IQ and polygenic scores significantly predicted all six of our political scales. Polygenic scores predicted social liberalism and lower authoritarianism, within-families. Intelligence was able to significantly predict social liberalism and lower authoritarianism, within families, even after controlling for socioeconomic variables. Our findings may provide the strongest causal inference to date of intelligence directly affecting political beliefs.

  • natural_motions@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well, no shit, the entire strategy of conservativism at any point in history has been to prey on the dumbest demographic of humans and form them into a support base.

    There are two kinds of conservatives 1) idiots 2) Grifters who prey on the idiots

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Except conservative Republicans led the abolition of slavery. The parties have flipped over time.

      EDIT: republicans of the time were progressive. Democrats were conservatives “preying on the dumbest”.

      • TwistyLex@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Those were progressive Republicans. The party Lincoln started was progressive at the time.

        The current Republican party is conservative, but that wasn’t always the case.

  • Brent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Any study that related intelligence to opinion is inherently inflammatory. It invites dismissiveness instead of engagement, excuses rude behavior, and presumes that certain opinions are so dumb the holder is incapable of growth. I get the satisfaction in giving me a hard time, but if we ever want to be any kind of enlightened we’re going to have to disagree without insulting each other.

    Consider that scholastic opportunity is much much higher in urban environments and that city folk tend to be more liberal. Consider that intelligence is difficult to define or measure - for instance, urbanites can’t tell the difference between a yellow jacket and a dirty dobber. That qualifies as stupid on some life tests. These are just two logical example of how confounding variables might lead to inaccurate and sloppy findings.

    For the record, modern Rs aren’t conservative. They have no integrity and how can you stand for anything if you lack that? They are opportunistic amoral power hungry manipulators. However, you can’t see their excessive narcissism and conclude that Ds are good, that’s just a weird inverted ad hominem.

    Winston Churchill said anyone under 30 who’s not a liberal has no heart. Anyone over thirty who isn’t conservative has no brain.