The adversarial relationship between Washington and Moscow prevented U.S. officials from sharing any information about the plot beyond what was necessary, out of fear Russian authorities might learn their intelligence sources or methods.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Mr. Bortnikov, the F.S.B. director, said on Tuesday that Islamist extremists alone couldn’t possibly have carried out the attack. He blamed, among others, the United States.

    Gee, I dunno how three or four lunatics could acquire guns.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    First it was that they did it and now it’s that Americans didn’t do enough to stop it lol.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Honestly the fact they gave them a heads-up at all is extra. If Russia knew about an attack coming in America they would 100% keep that shit to themselves.

      • JillyB@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        During the Obama administration, the national security director (I think) created the policy of “duty to inform”. The idea being that American intelligence agencies had a duty to inform a target if they knew about an upcoming attack (even an adversary). A big exception is when the warning would compromise the source of the information.

  • BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The attack was claimed by ISIS-K - a foreign fighter offshoot/offbrand. Funny thing is that ISIS-K fighters were getting lifts from American chanook helicopters in Afghanistan and is largely made up of US assets and/or people formerly trained by the US in Afghanistan.

    Lots points to it being a CIA asset, tldr. They’re a dirty army that can be used to keep an area distabilised or prevent other geopolitical powers from building infrastructure/influence (the nutshell purpose of ISIS-K, particularly in Afghanistan to prevent pipelines being built).

    They had the inside scoop on an attack outside any usual operating theatre by a group with tangible links to US cooperation/orientation? No kidding.

      • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        NATO was formed in 1949, already after 2nd world war. Russia has been hated for way longer, so much so that countries neighboring it saw “allying”* with nazis preferable over having Russia take over them

        *some didn’t have much option, allying or being taken over with much more violence

          • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I’m including USSR in the term Russia because obvious reasons, it was still the same country with different name, and USSR annexed bunch of countries around it.

            Those countries that “broke from USSR” were independent nations before.

            No one has instilled as much hate against communism as the few dictatorships calling themselves communist have. Not even USA, where ‘communist’ has been a slur for the past hundred years

              • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I should have probably said they claim to be socialist, but USSR and North Korea was first ones in my mind.

                I like your question, it’s only purpose is to try catch me on some small technicality, or get a chance to bombard 17 links to tankie wiki with alternative facts about how Stalin was actually a great democratically selected leader

          • tiredturtle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            The Red Scare is a more like side goal because communism threatens oligarchies. The Soviet Union also had its hand in persecuting communists.

  • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    We told them there was an increased risk. They don’t need to know how we know or the specifics. They chose not to listen or act, and completely dismissed our advice as nonsense. This is on them.

    • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The US publicly said that there was an increased risk in Moscow for the 48 hours following March 7th. Whether they privately said anything more is unknown (neither side is too eager to share).

      Indeed, for the 48 hours following March 7th, security at places like Crocus City Hall was ramped up.

      Edit: would you like to hazard a guess as to what was happening at Crocus City Hall on March 7th-9th?

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      “We” “Our”

      you are not the American government. They are your oppressors. They are not on your side.

    • mindlight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Pfffft… Russia already knew it was Ukraine long before USA received intel about ISIS preparing the attack. /s