• Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Seeing as how Mussolini has a daughter who is alive today and just as fascist as their father, is this person Marx’ descendant?

  • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Are we acting like the US isn’t the biggest surveillance state existing in all history?

    So because there’s one app they don’t control the data on, we need to ban it? Sounds like the free market to me.

    • possibly a cat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean, US TikTok data is already processed by Oracle. And Larry Ellison’s Oracle is a CIA operation. They already control the relevant data - exclusively.

      What they want is all of the data, so that the US can use it to harm national security of other states. It’s projection, as always in US politics.

      It’s also definitively fascist… as always in US politics.

  • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Yes, I too would love the US president to decide which social media platforms I am allowed to legally use and who I can legally communicate with. I’m so scared China is going to, checks notes, influence my opinion that I’m willing to sacrifice my free speech rights in the process. Regulate me harder, daddy! 😍

  • elfin8er@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Has anybody actually read the bill?

    The whole bill is about giving the government power to ban “foreign adversary controlled applications” and there’s nothing about the president being able to ban whatever app they want.

    The bill defines a foreign adversary as: “a country specified in section 4872(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code”:

    • The People’s Republic of China, including the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (China);

    • Republic of Cuba (Cuba);

    • Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran);

    • Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea);

    • Russian Federation (Russia); and

    • Venezuelan politician Nicolás Maduro (Maduro Regime).

    So unless you are on the side of the enemies of the US and want social media apps controlled by them, I don’t know why you wouldn’t support this bill.

    Edit: I think the misunderstanding/misinformation comes from a few places, but ultimately I think it boils down to the fact the bill requires the app/platform to be a foreign adversary AND it requires a presidential executive order before the app will be banned.

  • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Large centralised social media platform should all be banned. I miss the times when all you had was forums hosted in someone’s basement, the Internet was a better place. Short form video content is the worst of the bunch though.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes, and I’ve read most of it. It’s not nearly as bad as the Patriot Act.

          I’m absolutely against this ban on first amendment grounds, but it’s not nearly as bad as the Patriot Act was and still is (it has changed names, but it’s pretty similar to how it was when passed).

          • possibly a cat@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Most of it? It’s 2 pages long. It’s not like you need much length with such sweeping provisions, though.

            The Patriot Act isn’t under a different name right now, instead the provisions were legalized through judicial precedence before it was allowed to expire. I guess that’s quite a small nitpick in the end (other than not being able to repeal it).

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yes, the bill isn’t that long, but I kind of skimmed parts.

              The Patriot Act was reauthorized several times, and it eventually expired, but it’s still effectively enforced by permanent provisions as well as other bills passed since then.

              Regardless, equating this bill and the Patriot Act is nonsensical. This bill allows the government to ban apps and services from adversary countries. It doesn’t authorize data collection on citizens or any of the other nonsense we got from the Patriot Act, it merely allows the government to block certain apps and services from US markets. It’s hardly the same thing.

              • possibly a cat@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                nonsensical

                That’s at least as hyperbolic as calling it the Patriot Act 2.0.

                It doesn’t authorize data collection on citizens or any of the other nonsense we got from the Patriot Act

                No need. It’s already legal. This bill builds on top of that foundation in a very meaningful way.

                it merely allows the government to block certain apps and services from US markets

                And the reason for this is evident based on the choice given to TikTok - allow the US access to all users data (preferably exclusively the US) through methods up to and including selling foreign stakes in the company. The world is capitalist and being closed out of US markets is an impossible handicap to play with. No one will invest because there is a severe limit to growth. This only leads to one outcome: Centralization of data through the US, or the business will be replaced with one that does.

  • Tak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t use TikTok and I don’t think anyone really should but if we’re going to ban TikTok for data collection then there are a lot of platforms that need to be banned. We know the 2016 election was fucked with through Facebook and not a damn thing has been done.

  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Democrats have convinced themselves taking over TikTok is the solution to their problems, but the reality is that if Joe Biden signs this bill into law when he is already tanking in the polls, particularly with young voters, he will hand the election to Trump. The youth will not forgive a party that was so extreme it banned or hijacked their favourite platform to censor them in order to keep a genocide going.

    Best line is at the end

  • Delphia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes, and?

    Does anyone think that China is just full of the warm fuzzies and wants us all to hold hands, make smores and sing kumbaya? They are every bit after power as the US is to hold onto it.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The United States has freedom of speech, freedom of travel, constitutional protections for your home and property, and the opportunity to improve your socioeconomic standings. China has none of those things. My first reaction to the headline was “fucking good!”. China is a one party State that operates as an effective dictatorship. They imprison journalists and protestors, they have legal slavery, they have almost no concern for the environment - massively poluting the planet, and they are extremely oppressive. Everyone’s all about Free Hong Kong and then come on Lemmy and act like they’re friends with the CCP. Who the fuck do you think Hong Kong seeks freedom from?

      • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Freedom of speech? Yes and no. The government has freedom of speech, but American TikTok clones do not. If TikTok users are successfully forced to use YouTube Shorts instead, they’ll get stuck with YouTube’s censorship and content control for corporate friendliness and user engagement. People like Elon give “free speech” a bad name, but it is actually a problem if for most people “the internet” is controlled by a small number of big technology companies and those companies use their positions, intentionally or not, to suppress ideas and control public discourse. TikTok users will still need to use words like “unalive” on platforms owned by American corporations.

        Constitutional protections for your home and property? Not really. Many people are renting and protections for renters vary by state. Property can be stolen by police through civil asset forfeiture.

        The opportunity to improve your socioeconomic standings, ie The American Dream, is largely a myth. Recently, the poor get poorer. Real estate values and cost of living are climbing much faster than wages for those at the bottom. If you’re at the bottom, it’s even more difficult than usual to get the four year degree and years of prior job experience required for many entry level positions with better pay.

        America has legal slavery enshrined in the constitution. If somebody is convicted of a crime, they can be sent to private prisons to do slave labor for somebody else’s profit. This disproportionately affects poor people and minorities.

      • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Every bit of this is truly wrong. You’ve been brainwashed by Western propaganda. I would guess you’re from the US

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          What are your sources for disputing the individual points they raised? I’ve happy to change my mind on this is you provide evidence.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Pretty easy to see the difference when we compare all the wars US has been involved in and all the countries where US has brutally interfered to what China has been doing.

      • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        These freedoms are a strength indeed, but they are also a vulnerability that can be exploited by foreign powers. Freedoms remain free so long as the people exercising those freedoms do so responsibly. I think a lot of people in the US do not exercise this freedom responsibly. I think a lot of Americans are being manipulated into voting in autocracy. Ironically.

        Complete and total freedom is just anarchy, and anarchy collapses on itself and turns into autocracy.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Not all states are equivalent.

      The US is the hegemonic imperial core country (like the UK before it) and has been since the end of WWII, and even moreso since the end of Cold War I. The imperial core’s imperialism is driven by the monopoly stage of capitalism. The imperial core has been pillaging the Global South for the last 200+ years and caused WWI & WWII & Cold War I, and has now started Cold War II.

      The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It

      But China is not a capitalist state and is not driven by the forces of monopoly capitalism that the imperial core is driven by.

  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Bans can be bypassed, but my concern is if the new law makes it criminal to use tiktok. If so, the media should stop saying “tiktok ban” and instead say “new law makes it a crime to use tiktok”

    • gorgori@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s a hosting ban on US servers and app stores. People already downloaded the app will continue to be able to use it.

      That is if Bytedance doesn’t sell.

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yikes, what a flawed set of premises.

    " What if Canada did the same thing to the US? They did!"

    No, they didn’t. Canada tried to boost Canadian media presence on American streaming platforms.

    Making sure gooby gets an international viewing very different from transmitting information to an overtly hostile government known for cyber attacks on its international peers.

    “The platform isn’t a national security threat”.

    On what basis are they making that claim? It’s absolutely a fact according to that the app TikTok is based off of, Douyin, sends the private data of every user straight to bytedance, owned in powerful minority stake by the Chinese government and that tiktok did the same thing with US user data until they promised they stopped a couple years ago.

    As of January 2024 however, whoops, US citizen data(names, birthdates, location) is still being sent back to bytedance: https://www.wsj.com/tech/tiktok-pledged-to-protect-u-s-data-1-5-billion-later-its-still-struggling-cbccf203?mod=followamazon

    It’s not some baseless concern, it’s a national security consequence against data disclosures that were already carried out and have continued to this year despite assurances 2 years ago that data leaks to bytedance are not happening.

    “Instrument of soft power”

    Marvel movies becoming super popular internationally is an example of soft power. Gathering the personal information of users with a continuing precedent attacking US digital infrastructures and democratic institutions is not soft power, it is hostile statecraft.

    I am not a proponent of monolithic tech companies nor am I particularly aligned against international competition in tech supremacy, but this ban isn’t about theoretical cultural competition.

    This tiktok ban is about the recent gathering of personal information that can be used to assess and attack digital infrastructures and electoral behaviors by entities that are continually attacking digital infrastructures and electoral processes, entities focused on consolidating power not within some international free market of soft cultural influence but by gathering and consolidating power and using that power to forward state ambitions.

    • firefly@neon.nightbulb.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      @Varyk@sh.itjust.works @davel@lemmy.ml

      If we wanted national data and communication security we would shut off the transatlantic cables and physically separate the U.S. Internet from the rest of the world. All matters of diplomacy could be conducted in public courts at the coastlines instead of over telephone wires and emails. Problem solved. We could set up a nice star-spangled curtain and let all the globalists rot from the fallout.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        “Afraid of your neighbor’s dog? Never leave your room, add a harness to your bed and strap in, wear plate armor at all times”.

        Not exactly practical.

        There are ways to improve security without immobilizing yourself.

        Blocking the widespread distribution and use of an app that sends personal and national data to a hostile government actively collecting and using that data to conduct digital and electoral attacks is not immobilizing, it’s a simple step with zero downside that safeguards hundreds of millions of people.

  • Howdy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The probability of a war between the US and China is very high as judged by the US military. Prominently over the Taiwan situation. Having service members with tiktok on their devices would be terrible for opsec. To me this confirms that we are continuing to track on that train of thought. With that line of thinking this seems to an increased likelihood. Be careful out there folks.

    Just my thoughts…

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I thought government employees were already banned from having TikTok on their devices. Does that not also apply to military personnel?

      • ForgetPrimacy@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The ban only applies to government devices. Government employees and military personnel can still have it on their personal devices, just that no one can install on a government device. Which really has me wondering, was that an option originally? Did I squander an opportunity to browse reddit all day from my government machine instead of “working”?

      • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        TikTok is banned from official devices, i.e. and phone provided by the DoD, etc. There is no ban on it being on a personal phone; just a strong recommendation against having the app.