• paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Damnit. I wish I known that an hour ago. I guess my butthole pic will live on with the internet for an eternity.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    You can’t delete any text in comments or posts either - or at least not reliably, as any federated instance could choose to ignore deletions.

    You should basically consider what you write or post here public, and probably public for good. But here’s the thing - same goes for the entire rest of the Internet as well, basically.

    • ooli@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I didnt know about that. This is a bit scary to be honest, and the first time I feel a bit taken aback with lemmy

      • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        You also know that all votes are technically public and can be viewed by any instance admin that’s federated with the server a community is on, right? There’s no way to see that in the Lemmy UI at the moment but the data is there on the server.

  • infeeeee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    What exactly is a KYC selfie? Is it a photo of an ID card? I figured out WUI is WebUI. The author uses some strange acronyms I never heard before.

    It’s very American that they can steal your identity with just one photo. My European state issued ID has data on both sides, so if someone would take a photo of it won’t be enough for anything. Also if you loose it you just get a new one and noone can use the old one for anything.

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      KYC = Know Your Customer, a team I just learned recently. It’s primarily related to financial transactions, to make crimes like money laundering or terrorism financing harder. Up until relatively recently this was something that primarily happened face-to-face, and it doesn’t seem like good controls have been developed for online use.

      I think some ID cards are single-sided, some are double-sided. One of the big problems is most Americans only have a state-issued ID, not a federal one, and the standards vary from state to state. They’ve tried to address this some with minimum standards for state IDs (mainly driver’s licenses) under a program called Real ID (enacted after 9/11 hijackers got state-issued IDs for false identities), but it was still optional for certain purposes, at least until recently. In my state for a long time when renewing your driver’s license it was optional to do the extra paperwork for a Real ID, but then there would be a note on the top that it was not valid for federal identification purposes, such as accessing certain government facilities or boarding an airplane. Since I have a passport I’ve never bothered with it, but it looks like this year getting a Real ID is mandatory when getting or renewing a driver’s license in my state.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s mostly a religious thing. The “left behind” Christians believe a federal ID is the “Mark of the Beast”.

    • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      For context, there’s a lot that goes on behind the scenes when it comes to lemmy admin stuff especially in the matrix channels. There is a significant frustration and lack of confidence in the lemmy developers at this point. Even those who try to contribute to the project get eventually feeling pushed out.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Based on what I’ve seen on the public facing part of the developer side, I get the feeling this isn’t the kind of group that can build the kind of organization required to make this sustainable in the long run.

        I’m just waiting for when Beehaw releases that they’ve given up on Lemmy and have created a new tech stack.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s open source. We don’t have to depend on the original developers.

          If it gets too bad, someone can just make a fork.

          Afaik people are just impatient with the developers and have different short term goals.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I mention a new tech stack because Beehaw brought it up as an option and a lot of people have commented on the difficulty of development in this environment.

              • Kogasa@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                It could still be rust. Code is always the easy part. Design and organization and funding are hard

              • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Rust seems like a great foundation.

                The fact that I know you’re referring to the programming language called “Rust” doesn’t make this sentence any less funny.

        • Ategon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          In terms of new tech stack currently theres sublinks being made by devs/admins of a bunch of instances (discuss.online, lemmy.world, programming.dev, etc.)

              • Kogasa@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Not really a substantial opinion, but I have little hope that replacing a fairly well established Rust codebase with a brand new Java one will do much in terms of increasing contribution.

                • thundermoose@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I wouldn’t shortchange how much making the barrier to entry lower can help. You have to fight Rust a lot to build anything complex, and that can have a chilling effect on contributions. This is not a dig at Rust; it has to force you to build things in a particular way because it has to guarantee memory safety at compile time. That isn’t to say that Rust’s approach is the only way to be sure your code is safe, mind you, just that Rust’s insistence on memory safety at compile time is constraining.

                  To be frank, this isn’t necessary most of the time, and Rust will force you to spend ages worrying about problems that may not apply to your project. Java gets a bad rap but it’s second only to Python in ease-of-use. When you’re working on an API-driven webapp, you really don’t need Rust’s efficiency as much as you need a well-defined architecture that people can easily contribute to.

                  I doubt it’ll magically fix everything on its own, but a combo of good contribution policies and a more approachable codebase might.