• adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It could just be me, but the quality of Google news absolutely tanked a couple of years ago.

    Trying to manage news sources became increasingly difficult as clickbait infested results and suggestions.

    It felt like they had lost their ability to separate “new content” from “news”.

  • Rob@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t think this is new I experienced this happening last year seemingly on certian searches.

  • FBJimmy@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve found all of the tabs on Google have a tendency to go AWOL these days - like the other day I was searching for camera lenses and Google took away the ‘Products’ (formerly kmown as ‘Shopping’) tab, even though what I was searching for couldn’t have been more obviously a product. Instead, all I could get were super low quality copy-paste blogs vaguely related to the product.

      • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s definitely on purpose to trick your muscle memory and the hope is that you purposely get driven somewhere else that you didn’t consider and like using it once you get mislead there

    • clearleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They change the interface pretty much every day. The people managing the image search are especially on crack. Features are disabled and then come back and then they’re disabled and then they come back… I just go to Bing now. I’m sorry my desire to search square images was such a monkey wrench in your business model google.

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      “We want you to interact with our new chat bot and ask it about the news” probably.

    • ElderberryLow@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I wondered the same. It’s not my primary way for getting news but it’s a good option to have if looking for articles on a certain topic.

      • Rob@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        probally has to do with a future plan to not pay for news content.

        In order for Google to improve profitability they targeted adblockers and adblockers in 3rd party browsers.

        If my prediction isn’t too far off, countries that enforce laws forcing Google to pay to the news may not get news at all or *very limited.

        • moistclump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Canada put a law in place last year requiring meta and Google to pay for users clicks into Canadian media. Facebook stopped allowing the sharing of our reputable news sources and I was temporarily impressed that Google continued on.

          • Rob@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            That is probally why. As more and more countries stack up more news tax for the tech companies. People seem to forget that news is optional for them, and shouldn’t take that for granted.

            Google search doesn’t need news, Facebook doesn’t need it, why would they want to pay for it?

          • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Because the content they show is literally the content the sites explicitly set up for the sole purpose of “if you link to my site, pretty please show this preview to make our link more attractive”. The idea that they owe a royalty for showing the content sites are explicitly asking them to show is completely indefensible.

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    One more for Google Graveyard™. It doesn’t surprise me. You’re better off not relying on their products too much as they all disappear. Would Gmail, YouTube or Maps disappear too soon?

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The only reason I use Google sometimes now is for the news tab, because duck duck go doesn’t have the ability to filter for older articles in its news tab.

  • tedu@azorius.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Are they testing removing the news tab or are they testing different tab orders and a bug hid the news tab?

  • LibreFish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    There’s already a number of countries trying implement news site link taxes, I wouldn’t be surprised if they just gave up and decided to cut that out.