• TheMurphy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly, Spotify is only half bad compared to the real scumbags of this industry, and that’s the “rights holders”.

    It’s not the artists who created the music I’m talking about. It’s the record companies taking the largest piece for themselves.

    They are the ones earning on other people’s talent and success.

      • Josh@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ll die on that hill. 90% of the artists I listen to, I found through spotify’s algorithms.

        • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Ok, but why not find a human that curates the kind of music you like? They are called DJs.

          I don’t understand why we need to get rid of human DJs that seems like the last job we need to replace.

          edit why do y’all think I am talking about radio DJs? You…. know there are wayyyyyyy more DJs out there than just radio DJs right?..…right?

          ….like y’all know mixes exist right? Like mixcloud or whatever?

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    For a company that has revolutionized the music industry and changed the way we listen to music, one would expect Spotify to be making a lot of money.

    How has spotify “revolutionized” the music industry? Are thy doing anything new? Streaming isn’t new, yearly reviews aren’t new, freemium isn’t new, discovery isn’t new… Is the revolution that it’s now a standard target for artists?

    • modcolocko@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Spotify literally changed the way people listen to music by being popular enough that the general way of listening changed from a purchase, listen forever model. To a listen to anything you want and never not have anything new, way of listening (but you don’t own anything).

      A song is no longer worth a purchase of a cd, or dollar at itunes. It’s worth the 3 minutes of listening that it gives you when Spotify recommends it to you.

      Obviously I’m biased. And also, yes, there were streaming services before Spotify, but nobody that mattered and with the influence of Spotify.

  • echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Ugh, yes poor poor spotify, fuck that. Artists can’t even make a living making music anymore thanks to spotify. Fuck off blaming artists for trying to get paid. Fuck this article. Oh no it only gets a third of the revenue?! Abhorrent, no it should get ALL the revenue, for doing what, having a server with music on it. Amazing. Fuck spotify.

    • 4realz@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Wooh. 👀. This isn’t Spotify’s fault. They can’t pay artists if they don’t have money.

      • 𝔇𝔦𝔬@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Haha. Don’t be shocked by the reaction. We live in a world where a certain portion of ‘people’ Believe every thing should be free and corporations don’t need money at all and should just be willed in to existence and live off of the ether.

        Etc. Etc. Rich people bad

  • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    To determine if this company is actually a poor widdle guy or just trying to look like their hands are tied with respect to paying artists, look up how much Daniel Ek is worth, and then look up what he does with his money