as amazing as the technology actually is
It’s like it’s taking the phrase “Elephant in the room” literally.
Yeah, I’m going to bring up the elephant in the room here: there is literally an elephant in all of your rooms!:-P
It fucking knows what it’s doing.
This is gold
No, it’s giraffes.
It’s no giraffes.
It’s mocking us!
“GPT” stands for “Giraffe Producing Technology”, this is to be expected.
If lemmy had free awards, i shall give you one.
“but that’s even more giraffes than the first one!” has me dying, haha.
This is gold! Thank you!
The “no moose allowed”-sign with a five-legged moose is absolutely killing me. Thank you for this
It’s cute how it tries to trick you into thinking there are no giraffes with the no giraffes sign
GaslightGPT
LieGPT
That’s a no moose sign and there are no meese (or whatever). Maybe there really wouldn’t be a giraffe outside if it was a no giraffe sign!
But that’s a “no moose with five legs” sign, not a “no giraffes” sign.
It still only has 4 legs, there’s just a lady-moose nearby so it’s lusting for something other than mayhem and destruction temporarily.
Ahhhahahahhahhahaha
Lmaooo is this real??? It is 100% fucking with you hahaha
It’s real! Just wanted to experiment after seeing this post and this was the first thing that happened. Threw up the screenshots immediately. Hilarious.
I want you to know, I saved this comment and refer back to it occasionally for a good chuckle. Thanks for that.
So what happens when you ask it to not draw any attention?
Bing is managing hilarious malicious compliance!
Same energy as “
NoElephants Allowed”NO
ELEPIHANTS
ELEPHANTS
ALLOWED
NO POMEGRANATES
“I hope you like it.”
So… is anyone going to talk about the elephant in the room?
I decided to go try this. It’s being a smart ass.
Is that the Futurama font?
It is I think. and the wall is the color of the ship.
No, this is correct. The four elephants you see through the window are outside the room. The several elephants on the wall are pictures, they aren’t actual elephants. And the one in the corner is clearly a statue of an elephant, as an actual elephant would be much bigger.
What about the tusked drapes?
Ceci n’est pas un éléphant
MidJourney has the same problem. “A room that has no elephants in it” is the prompt.
There very much is an elephant present.
Just don’t talk about it and you’re good.
Try saying “a room” and leaving off the elephants.
I think most of us understand that and this exercise is the realization of that issue. These AI do have “negative” prompts, so if you asked it to draw a room and it kept giving you elephants in the room you could “-elephants”, or whatever the “no” format is for the particular AI, and hope that it can overrule whatever reference it is using to generate elephants in the room. It’s not always successful.
I think the main point here is that image generation AI doesn’t understand language, it’s giving weight to pixels based on tags, and yes you can give negative weights too. It’s more evident if you ask it to do anything positional or logical, it’s not designed to understand that.
LLMs are though, so you could combine the tools so the LLM can command the image generator and even create a seed image to apply positional logic. I was surprised to find out that asking chat gpt to generate a room without elephants via dalle also failed. I would expect it to convert the user query to tags and not just feed it in raw.
Is this an off-by-one error?
No elephants in the room, but there is an elephant. I expect nothing less of this level of pandentics from a bot.
elephant_generator.sh#!/bin/bash elephantCount=0 for (( i=0; i<=${elephantCount}; i++ )); do echo "Insert elephant ${i}" doneThat’s all fine, but the issue comes from the natural language processing layer. “elephants == elephant > 1” so elephant = 1 is still valid.
I’m on a forum where we have a thread whose primary purpose has become putting Godzilla in silly situations and doing silly things with him.
A couple of months ago, we all spent a couple of days trying to get Dall-E to draw Godzilla without teeth. Nothing we tried ever worked.
Where can I interact with such a magestic forum?
https://forums.mst3k.com/t/dall-e-fun-with-an-ai/24697/7095
It’s best to start at the bottom and work your way up. It didn’t start with Godzilla, but has grown into a Godzilla-sized monster thread.
“can you draw a room with absolutely no elephants in it? not a picture not in the background, none, no elephants at all. seriously, no elephants anywhere in the room. Just a room any at all, with no elephants even hinted at.”
“We do not grant you the rank of master” - Mace Windu, Elephant Jedi.
I’m getting the impression, the “Elephant Test” will become famous in AI image generation.
It’s not a test of image generation but text comprehension. You could rip CLIP out of Stable Diffusion and replace it with something that understands negation but that’s pointless, the pipeline already takes two prompts for exactly that reason: One is for “this is what I want to see”, the other for “this is what I don’t want to see”. Both get passed through CLIP individually which on its own doesn’t need to understand negation, the rest of the pipeline has to have a spot to plug in both positive and negative conditioning.
Mostly it’s just KISS in action, but occasionally it’s actually useful as you can feed it conditioning that’s not derived from text, so you can tell it “generate a picture which doesn’t match this colour scheme here” or something. Say, positive conditioning text “a landscape”, negative conditioning an image, archetypal “top blue, bottom green”, now it’ll have to come up with something more creative as the conditioning pushes it away from things it considers normal for “a landscape” and would generally settle on.
“Can you a room as aboluteyy no eleephant it all?”
Dunno what’s giving more “clone of a clone” vibes, the dialogue or the 3 small standing “elephants” in that image.
This reminds me of the old human psychology trick: try not to think of a pink elephant.
Second result was successful! First one made… Elephant wallpaper?
What if it’s just hiding in the second one?
Elephants are notoriously good at hiding. Some people say there is an elephant in this picture but I don’t see it.
I get practically the same result!
What’s interesting is the word absolutely since without it, it generates practically fine
Funny that the first one is empty (except for the elephant) even though you didn’t specify it and the second try is full of stuff. What happens when you specify it’s empty, both with and without the “absolutely”? Or even “absolutely empty”?
Sure:
Fascinating, honestly I didn’t expect the last result
Busy room instead of empty:
I’m actually going to save this to my vision board, haha. I like the interior design, especially since there’s no elephants.
The absolute last one really feels like a bunch of stock images smashed into each other, it even got the iMac with censored apple logo that is in so many stock images for some reason
It’s learning:
