Like, technically, but clearly the CPC wanted it dead. The LPC was also rather divided but mostly supported it.
My guy voted “Yea” though, so they’re cool.
I’m oddly proud of BC, way to get a majority there guys.
But major kudos to Quebec, your MP’s are actually listening (here), but also NWT, Nova Scotia, Nunavut, PWI, and the Yukon.
As is tradition though, the prairies let us down.
We love dynasties out here on the prairies, no matter how little it relates to reality.
Same.
Same. Was legit surprised lol.
The CPC are probably convinced the only way they can achieve a majority under Poilievre is if they get a false majority through a lucky roll of FPTP. In 2015 they were all upset that the LPC got a majority with only 39% of votes
Respect to all the Bloc MPs who voted yea. Those guys make out like bandits under the current system.
This wasnt a motion to change the base system, only some slight adjustments to improve access.
Right, I remember now someone shared that a few days ago. Well, I suppose that’s less impressive then. And way less impressive on the part of the HoC to not pass something basic like improved voting access.
I don’t think that is a accurate portrayal of the motion.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-electoral-reform-1.7101929
The House of Commons will vote next week on Motion 86. Sponsored by NDP MP Lisa Marie Barron, the motion calls on the federal government to establish a citizens assembly to "determine if electoral reform is recommended for Canada, and, if so, recommend specific measures that would foster a healthier democracy
I can appreciate someone voting for their ideals rather than for their interests.
Can someone explain how the PM has both a yea and nay vote? I’m genuinely confused.
This looks more accurate: https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/12865436#DOC--12867863
He voted Nay :(
At least the political will is growing.
Yeah I really hope that we gain traction for this within our lifetimes because I think it will be the first step in helping our democracy reflect the will of the people
Seems wrong that the elected people get to decide if we change how they get elected. Once they have their seat they can fight to keep it against electoral change.
