• pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I will always prefer my iPod Mini with extra storage, new battery and Rockbox like this guy did, and the reasons are:

    • better overall build and audio quality
    • way cheaper (70-80$ vs 249$)
    • better software support (Rockbox is FOSS and has been going on for ages and it’s not gonna stop)
    • it actually upcycles old hardware instead of buying new devices and creating more e-waste
    • nostalgia value +100 points
  • Blaze@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nice project. $249 seems a bit high, but I guess it’s like the Fairphone, they can’t save as much as the large manufacturers do.

      • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m genuinely curious if someone’s published a BoM cost breakdown, I’m wondering if there’s a couple of super high tickets items in the like the scroll wheel and custom PCB cost.

        • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The cost of the scroll wheel cannot possibly be more than 10€ and the pcb cannot be more than 1€ battery is about 4e and display can be 7-8, chip is 2-3e and passives, connectors etc brlow 5. The manufacturing costs of the thing are likely below 40€, even in small volumes. Assy costs are probably about 20% of the total.

          Part of the high cost may be investments in moulds for the casing and r&d cost.

          • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, I took a bit of a poke last night, there’s a couple of ICs in there that could add up a bit I guess, but even being generous I wasn’t getting much last 80.

            The cases I saw had the look of a 3D print about them. Original goal seems to have been around 10000, so maybe they’re amortizing the r&d across 40 units, little bit of profit and then went and sold 400 of them - nice win for them if so!

            To make it clear I don’t begrudge them their profit especially as they’re open sourcing the thing. The concept and high price has got my creative side going for sure, an ESP32-S3 pro dev board looks like it could handle an sd card, screen, MP3 decode and output to an I2S amp all by itself + BT headphones and WiFi track downloading and battery charging. Slowly talking myself into building a portable podcast machine.

            • ailurux@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Hey, one of the people working on Tangara here. The case we’re shipping with will be CNC’d polycarbonate, though the same design also works for home 3d printing.

              The price is a lot of little things adding up, and we want to be able to do smaller runs post-campaign and still have it be worth our time. I also wish it could be more affordable, but that’s how it be with indie electronics.

              Good luck if you do decide to make a little podcast machine! Just be aware that afaik ESP32-S3 can’t do bluetooth audio (see: https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/issues/8675).

    • yannic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s a project by an Australian team, so one would assume two things:

      1. It’s in Australian Dollars.
      2. Australia has experienced severe hyperinflation overnight (or earlier today, for many of us reading this)
        • yannic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The only source is the absolutely bonkers price – that’s why it’s an assumption.

          In all seriousness, if I were to release open source hardware and software, I’d charge a price like that to ensure that my time would be reasonably compensated for what’s clearly going to involve small production batches of hand-built-in-the-first-world items.

          • harry_balzac@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            It all has to do with Taytay Swizzle. WAKE UP SHEEPLE! She will be crowned Empress of the World by chief Illuminatus Warren Buffet and the antiChrist Catholic puppet Joe Biden during the Super Bowl halftime show! Only Trump and Dildoboy Nugent can save us!!! /s

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well if Apple owns IP on it, I guess it would have to be a patent. The hardware would be quite different I guess, so would be a design patent with a max of 15 years from 2001 when the first iPod was released.

          I’d guess Apple wouldn’t sue, for a design out of patent (so no obligation to defend it) and that they don’t even use anymore. (I ANAL)

          • perishthethought@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Cool cool cool. I miss my old iPod with the click wheel, so I hope you’re right. I’d love to get an open-source hardware device using one now.

            • Dave@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              It would be interesting to use one and see if it feels the same. The original iPods had this very specific feeling to them. If it was replaced with say a glass capacitive circle or it if had different haptic feedback then it would feel quite different.

  • blackfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    20 hour battery life of use is actually far better than I thought it would be. Wonder what the pi equiv build would bu

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s actually so low imo. It just plays music and doesn’t connect to internet right? Should last for like a week at least.

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The Pi in any form is a much larger system with a whole lot more clock cycles, larger architecture, and more peripherals like a full memory management unit, graphics hardware, etc.

      On the flip side IIRC most ESP32’s are 210MHz and just dual core. It is microcontroller versus microprocessor, so probably 10× less power or more.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        A Raspberry Pi Pico would be sufficient for this. It uses the RP2040, which is comparable to the ESP32, minus the WiFi.

        • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Actually not really. The pi pico has no functional, good low power states currently developed. That is essential for a mobile device. A pi pico would simply drain the battery in sleep mode very quickly.

          Tons of MCUs could do the job. Some STMs would also be good for it. The pi pico is more focused at non-mobile applications though at the moment like a very cheap general MCU for things that are USB powered or mains powered.

          • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            For something like this, you would use the RP2040 chip rather than the whole Pi Pico module. The RP2040 uses 180µA in its lowest power sleep mode and the flash and regulator will use a few more microamps. The battery would still last for over a year in standby. Of course it could just be turned off when not in use. Without an operating system, the boot time should only be a fraction of a second.

            The ESP32 uses 800µA in sleep mode if you want to retain the memory contents or 10µA with only the RTC memory retained.

            A low power STM32 would use orders of magnitude less power in sleep mode than either the RP2040 or ESP32 though.

            • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Yes, I know. I have designed with the RP2040 and 180μA is extremely high power usage for deep sleep mode.

              The ESP32 has far more sleep modes than that that each use different power, you are just talking about its light sleep: https://docs.espressif.com/projects/esp-idf/en/latest/esp32/api-reference/system/sleep_modes.html

              You are comparing the deep sleep of the pi pico to the light sleep of the ESP32 where the coprocessor is still running. The rp2040 light sleep mode consumes 7mA. It is literally orders of magnitude different. https://learn.adafruit.com/deep-sleep-with-circuitpython/rp2040-sleep (they only did light sleep.mode because deep sleep wasn’t even available)

              As far as the professional chips, they cost on average far more for less and less sleep gains. (A lot of the L series of stm is like 15€ per chip)

              You would definitely use deep sleep for this as you would only wake it up to start using it with a button press. Whether they would use light sleep or deep sleep, there is an order of magnitude difference in sleep power consumption.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Has anyone checked out prices for refurbished ipod classics? $300 for a 20 year old mp3 player! Insanity!

    Edit: looking at the specs for the Tangara… 16MB of internal storage??? Uhhhhhhh… I guess the intent is to use an SD card.

  • Dynamo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well damn. Might be what i was looking for. Gotta know if it had Gapless Playback before purchase though

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Hopefully people take the source and release a full walkthrough on doing this with an entirely off-the-shelf design. I’ve got a full electronics workshop and two 3d printers and would LOVE to assemble my own music player with open source designs.

        • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Making a lower quality copy of a file to save a minimal amount of space is a waste of my time. Besides 2TB is enough space for over 7,000 hours of basic 44.1kHz 16-bit FLAC listening.

          • potustheplant@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Totally. Dropping a folder to fre:ac and clicking 2 buttons takes an enormous amount of time.

            Also, 7000 hours of FLAC 16/44.1 is about 4.44 TB so your math is pretty off.

            • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s what I get for using an online calculator.

              Still I’ve got almost 40,000 FLAC files of various quality levels with a duration of roughly 2,700 hours taking up only 1.2 terabytes. Still within the same order of magnitude and still plenty of space in 2TB for a collection I’ve been curating for 25 years. I don’t think it’s worth my time to suddenly manage a lesser quality copy of each of those just for a portable player.

              • BustinJiber@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                I don’t want this question to sound like it’s in bad faith but how much of this do you listen to, and how much of it just sits there forgotten? My catalogue is about 361 GB (CD rips and purchased downloads) of flacs and I had to make separate folder that I named “!threat of irrelevancy”, that is 36 GB in size, for what I believe is an obvious yet personal reason. These numbers are far exceeding any logical timeframe.

                • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah, this is a question in bad faith from a child to someone that’s been curating a collection of music for more than a quarter of a century.

                  This isn’t even my entire collection, I’ve got at least a couple orange crates packed with vinyl, CDs, mp3s, concert videos, and even some cassettes for nostalgia. Do I listen to everything I’ve gotten digitally? Not yet, but I don’t plan on stopping my listening any time soon and drive space is cheap, so I figure that I’ve got time.

                  Your “logical timeframe” is both naive and deeply insulting. I’m going to enjoy my library hobby anyway, but you can just fuck off with your negative attitude.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You can’t hear flac. But no it doesn’t do 2tb. Is this $250 device water resistant? Does it have a clip? Does it have an FM tuner?

        • fogstormberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I can hear flac is better than mp3. maybe I can’t hear all flac has to offer, but its a better listening experience. also the page 100% says it supports up to 2tb sd. the things you listed literally dont matter to me

          • potustheplant@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            That depends on way more than just the file format of your music. With a device like this one, you literally wouldn’t be able to tell them apart.

          • Neato@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I mean no one can even hear all the way up the bitrate of MP3s. So no one can actually hear FLAC.

            also the page 100% says it supports up to 2tb sd.

            No I was answering your question that the Sandisk didn’t support that.

            e things you listed literally dont matter to me

            Cool. I was asking what is so interesting about this $250 iPod and how does open source benefit it? Besides holding so many songs you’ll never listen to them I mean. It doesn’t appear to have functionality a player 1/5th it’s cost does. And no one has given me an answer on what functionality open source could enable for an mp3 player that isn’t already available.

            • potustheplant@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              They don’t answer your questions because they don’t like the answers, simple as that. My advice would be to not waste any more of your time on this. That’s what I’m going to do at least. You can’t argue with fanatics.

      • BustinJiber@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It supports FLAC but goes only to about 64 GB micro SD cards. Although they made newer models since, but every one seem to have missing important features, like Bluetooth only or lack of SD cards support.

    • lukstru@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      What’s the point of open sourcing this product?

      Some people just like to have the possibility to change and completely own their stuff. Some people actually do change firmware or hardware components. I’d say it’s mostly for tech enthusiasts and tinkerers.

      • SheeEttin@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think most people will continue to just use their smartphone and get a Fairphone or something if it matters to them.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It could do whatever since it is open source and uses ESP-IDF. Adding features like that or coding an entirely new firmware would be well within hobbyist capabilities.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s weird to ask “what the point of open sourcing this product”, do you ask what the point of keeping the source closed is?

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        What benefits do you get from this device being open source? It’s not like a dumb mp3 player is stealing your data. Can it do anything traditional players can’t?

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          what benefits do you get from that painting being blue? what benefits do you get from eating an orange vs an banana? explain yourself.

          • Neato@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            This might be the more inane and useless response I’ve seen on Lemmy. You can’t answer the simple question so you throw out a complete change of topic. Pathetic.

  • Grofit@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I just want an mp3 player to replace my Walkman with sensme, they killed sensme and nothing has replaced it so to date the best mp3 player I own is that little thing, I tell it what mood I am in and it always delivers, I dread the day it dies.

    I’ve tried cloud based music services like Spotify etc they are not really same thing as it’s just global playlists for a mood/genre, not something tailored to your tastes in a set catalogue.

      • Grofit@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve tried them and they were hit and miss, also to make things more niche most of my music is a mix of video game music and film/anime music, which Spotify is quite short on.

        Spotify and other services are trying to make you discover new music. While that’s useful I just want it to analyse my local music and work out what to play.

        Its a shame the tech exists but as its patented (I think) you can’t simply make an open source version, I believe really it’s just a 2d graph plot against tempo and some other metric derived from analysis.