President Biden vowed on Monday to veto a House Republican bill that would provide $17.6 billion in aid to Israel, calling it a “cynical political maneuver” intended to hurt the chances of passage for broader legislation that would provide money for Israel, Ukraine, Taiwan and the U.S. border.

House Republicans fiercely oppose the larger bill, which was unveiled by a small, bipartisan group of senators over the weekend. It calls for $118.3 billion in spending and would overhaul some of the nation’s immigration laws to deal with recent surges of migrants at the southern border.

Archive

  • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I hate that the two are becoming more and more conflated. Ukraine is fighting off a invasion; Israel is invading and has driven the people of palestine into radical organization and direct action. These funds should go to aid and peace efforts instead.

    • PopcornTin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Invasion? That some racist talk right there. Give them a notice to appear in court in the next five years and leave them alone.

    • CylonBunny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Also Gaza is the size of basically just one neighborhood inside of Kiev alone. The scale of two the conflicts are so massively different. Many Americans I’ve discussed this with have no idea how much bigger Ukraine is.

      • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yeah that’s definately another great point. Ukraine and Palestine are both threatened by colonialist erasure, that’s the parallel I’d like to see drawn- they absolutely have that in common. Would love to see Israel and it’s nationalist government compared to Russia more often- there’s so much misinformation and misdirection in the news nowadays.

    • CptEnder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      The more I think about it, we should just airstrike all the Christian, Muslim, and Jewish holy sites in Israel. There now there’s no reason to fight over your space wizards. Problem solved.

    • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Also Gaza is NOT a war while Ukraine is, Gaza is a genocide.

      In Ukraine organized military forces clash over territory with both sides fielding artillery, tanks, aircraft and other sophisticated military systems. Russia is seeking to control Ukraine and annex most of it, but it literally has to roll tanks all the way through contested territory to do this.

      Israel already controls and surrounds all of Gaza, it controls all administrative and infrastructural aspects of Gaza so much so that Israel was able to build a wall straight through the heart of Gaza just to fuck with Palestinians. There is no ground war in Gaza with infantry divisions fighting over territory, there is just Israel repeatedly dropping an absolutely absurd amount of bombs (dropping in several weeks on the tiny footprint of Gaza what the bomb happy US only managed to drop in a year in the Iraq War) on a civilian population that has no means to leave even if they wanted to.

      Hamas is not a terrorist organization because it chose to do so instead of building a traditional army, it is a terrorist organization because a war with big armies is simply impossible for Hamas to even begin to fight against the combined military industrial complex of the U.S. and Israel.

      I am not defending Hamas (I am so tired of saying this, of course they are awful) but simply pointing out Israel’s main justification for their genocide is that Hamas is choosing to be a terrorist organization because they are evil and not because it is an organization of people who feel armed resistance is necessary (a sentiment Israeli’s should understand) and terrorism is literally the only armed resistance option on the table. It’s not like Hamas makes tunnels because they love digging and just don’t feel like fielding armored divisions of 120mm main battle tanks.

      Gaza is collective punishment for the actions of a few, it is horrific slaughter and land theft, it is a rightwing fantasy of violence but It is NOT a war that makes the IDF look way too honorable here. Gaza is what happens after a war ends and one side has complete power over the other. It is closer to soldiers raping and pillaging a civilian population en masse in the wake of an invasion than a war.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Superficially this sounded plausible, but then when I thought about it I couldn’t make any sense of it. Do you mind explaining?

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Surprising given the whole genocidin biden thing. is he fixated on causing genocide. this makes no sense unless international politics is complicated or something.

  • thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is so stupid. NYTimes putting the phrase “to deal with recent surges of migrants at the southern border”…there IS no surge of migrants. They’re pushing bullshit in a passive way to make it sound legitimate.

    • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Let’s see what the source says:

      https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/southwest-land-border-encounters

      There were 50k more border encounters in December than the year before. In fact, encounters have been significantly higher than past years since August (no data for January).

      You can aree or disagree with the response to the influx of people at the border. But there is no denying there has been a considerable increase in traffic.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think the increase is corroborated by other measures, such as the size of tent cities in Tijuana etc.

          Still, even if calling it a “migrant surge” is factually accurate, that doesn’t stop it from being propagandistic loaded language that any legitimate media outlet should avoid.

      • Bonesince1997@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Except we’ve heard this (the surge point) every year for the past several election seasons and at other times. Someone didn’t learn the lesson of the boy who cried wolf. Tough to get people to listen when it’s actually happening if you bullshit them at other times.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ignoring the facts given to you because someone else lied about this in the past doesn’t really make any sense.

        • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t disagree one bit. The Border™ gets trotted out more than it ought to every couple years. That’s probably why this issue will never be fixed–it’s great at riling people up.

          However, I think people should still be aware of the facts of the situation. At least if they actually care about the problem. Misinformation doesn’t fix anything.

          • Melkath@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            I also need to point out that you are sharing a .gov link and treating it like the bible.

            I find .gov citations to be some of the least reliable sources of information on the internet.

            America is OBSESSED with propaganda.

            • TheOriginalGregToo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              This right here confuses me. The people claiming that government numbers can’t be trusted are the same people who regularly rolled out government covid death numbers are the gospel truth during covid. My personal belief is that those numbers were wildly overblown, so I’m willing to believe that in this case you might be right and the migrant numbers are also overblown. That being said you can’t have it both ways. We’re the covid death numbers false?

              • Melkath@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Brother, you caught a real one.

                I am very confused.

                I try to live my life mathematically. I cite sources that claim firm numbers frequently.

                We are in a fucky time.

                Everyone has the ability to capture unimpeachable figures, but everyone with a grasp on the raw data has a dude an inch over their shoulder saying “100 bucks if you fudge it.”

                We got strong in tech and the first thing we did as a digital world was fire the QA people and the auditors.

                Seems like a great way to faceplant the gift of computers.

                But what can you do?

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          If you think this is BS, then bring numbers and facts. This surge, at the moment, is real. Check OP’s link.

          It’s real. It’s happening. FFS, put politics aside, this is a humanitarian issue. And how are we to absorb so many extra immigrants this year?

          Conservatives are bitching about jobs. Liberals are bitching about housing costs. Both concerns are wildly complex, but we have an issue right now, today.

          Check my earlier comments and numbers. How do you propose to deal with an extra CHICAGO+ worth of humans? How fast can we build infrastructure and housing? I will point out, we’re only talking about illegal Southern border crossings, leaving out the rest of the immigration story. FFS, my wife is an immigrant. We’re trying to get her son over here.

          I don’t have ideas, no ideas we can deploy fast enough, I ain’t that smart. But just because conservatives are pitching a fit doesn’t mean our current border crossings are not an issue.

          We’re talking about live human beings here. Waving them off as a GOP conspiracy is ignorant at best, hurting people. Want to go to the border and tell those people they’re not real? Tell them they’re GOP pawns? Or, someone will come along and tell me they don’t believe government numbers they don’t agree with. Like the nuts did with COVID and the CDC?

          • Bonesince1997@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            I hear you. But you missed my point. Because at other times people lied about surges, it makes it harder to believe them when they occur. That’s all I said. I have no alternate story or numbers for our current predicament.

          • PopcornTin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s real. It’s happening. FFS, put politics aside, this is a humanitarian issue. And how are we to absorb so many extra immigrants this year?

            Easy, just don’t look. Then I don’t have to believe it exists.

            It’s like the old sanctuary cities. Politicians pontificating that “all are welcome,” and “no human is illegal,” until their city actually gets too many of them. Then it’s, “whoa there, they should stay in Texas, not come here!”

        • David_Eight@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          According to these statistics, the same thing happens every year. If you look at the previous years they all start to go up in January then peak around May and start to decline after that. So what’s the big deal if this happens every year? It’s to be expected.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            The conservatives have been trotting out the “southern border crisis” red herring for so long that The Democrats were the first party to do it in the US. They keep doing it because it works. Those of us that live next to the border, like I do, can tell everyone back east that there’s no problem, but if one racist asshole starts yelling, there’s a whole bunch of racist assholes that live 2000 miles away that get scared and riled up.

            • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              The real problem is your deranged government officials bussing them all over the god damn US. Not that we can control your idiots but our idiots need to respond in kind. That is recieving them. Providing humane care and shelter. Then funding legal representation to sue the shit out of the people who sent them there.

              Using human lives as a political hot potato is fucking despicable.

              • kaputt@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yes, using human lives as a political hot potato is despicable. However, the policy it implies (sharing the burden of caring for immigrants) is actually quite reasonable, and already policy in places like Germany.

                • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Im betting German policy is a bit more involved than buying them a bus ticket and forcibly making sure they don’t miss that bus.

              • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                I live in California. Our government is receiving busses from everywhere.

                I agree that Greg Abbot should be arrested on human trafficking charges.

                • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Sucks that it is happening. The second we put those people on a bus America has an obligation to them as the people who have purposefully done them harm. They aren’t just migrants anymore they are victims.

                • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yeah and California already has a border with Mexico, so it’s not like “sharing the burden” is a legitimate argument. Texas just wants to stick its thumb in California’s eye.

            • Fedizen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              what conservatives are upset about is often legal migrants and sometimes tourists. Its more transparent when cons talk about black people as “black culture”. They say its the “illegals” they’re worried about, but I doubt any rich republican employs less than 6 “Illegals” because I haven’t met a rich person that paid a fair wage. Its always been unserious.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Looking at the graph, it’s well over 3x what it was in 2021…seems pretty obvious to me why this might be concerning.

            • David_Eight@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              During Covid the government enacted title 42 and didn’t allow any migrants entry to mitigate the spread of covid. Since covid is over they rescinded title 42, now all the asylum seekers waiting at the boarder are crossing as they would have just been turned away before. This was a predictable outcome and next year the numbers will drop back down.

              • TheOriginalGregToo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                What do you make of people coming from continents besides South America? Do we owe it to Russian or Chinese citizens to offer them asylum? From my perspective asylum is something you offer your direct neighbors who are fleeing threats on their lives. Offering asylum to literally any citizen of the world seems a bit extreme. If someone in China fears for their life, certainly there are closer and more accessible countries they can flee to.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                An interesting point and I would be curious to see if it would pan out.

        • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’ll never forget for months them screeching about it, and literally a day after the mid-term elections were over, the “caravans” were literally never mentioned again; until the next election year that is…

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t. We got the biggest and most important climate bill ever, likely in the entire world, by getting to ostensibly package it as an anti-inflation bill.

      Politics is a game of negotiation and compromise. The same impulse as “nothing should ever be logrolled” is saying we should be entirely uncompromising on everything always.

      If Ukraine and Israel aid were not bundlable, guess what? We’d get Israel and not Ukraine aid. The more deserving recipient wouldn’t get the aid.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The negative far outweighs benefits .

        It should be, but hasn’t since the early two thousands

        A foreign aid package wouldn’t violate it

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        We got the biggest and most important climate bill ever

        Nah that bill got ruined by “negotiation and compromise” and opened up millions new acres of land leasing for oil and gas extraction. We’re gonna continue breaking emissions records every year

        We’d get Israel and not Ukraine aid.

        Because we’ve elected zionists and russian agents. And because of that this bill is likely to not pass, and each side can point at a different part of the bill to justify opposing it.

  • CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Isn’t Israel the ‘bigger fish’ in their conflict? I don’t question that our status is “allies”, but it’s so strange thinking they need “help”?

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s even more gross if you read the article. Mike Johnson is saying Israel is “fighting for its very existence.” Fucking lying conservative trash.

    • Israel would have no chance of continueing its escalation with all the neighbouring countries if it wasnt for US military aid. They dont have the capacities to produce that many bombs, missiles, tank and artillery shells.

      The US needs Israel to be at perpetual escalation and war to destabilize the Midlle East and prevent the emergence of an unified arab bloc that would be the size of the EU, but control many of the cheap oil ressources and vital trade routes.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Too bad the US power structure is tied to oil, it prevents our economy from shifting away from oil and freeing ourselves from the ME bullshit.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Israel would have no chance of continueing its escalation with all the neighbouring countries if it wasnt for US military aid. They dont have the capacities to produce that many bombs, missiles, tank and artillery shells.

        That is simply false. Israel’s defense industry is one the world’s biggest.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_industry_of_Israel

        Israel doesn’t need U.S. aid. They just know they can get U.S. aid because they have the U.S. wrapped around their little finger.

        It’s a great con. Get weapons for free from the U.S. while selling your own.

        • In your article it states that in 2022 they managed to export 12.5 billion worth of equipment. Elbit Systems, former IMI had a turnover of 5 billion dollars in 2021 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbit_Systems

          In your article it also states that the main exports and focus are aerospace, in particular drones. But for a sustained war they mainly need missiles, artillery and tank shells and bombs. Of course they also need to be able to replace destroyed equipment such as tanks and artilleries. All of these need heavy industries, in particular steel and chemical industry. Israel has been importing iron and steel mainly from Turkey. If Turkey would continue to supply them is uncertain. They cannot manufacture all of the stuff by themselves. Especially as their sites are easily targeted in an upscaled war. The US are currently talking about an 18 billion military aid package. So 150% of the annual arms export rate of Israel.

          If Israel goes to war with most of it’s neighbours it would be unlikely that countries like Egypt would allow for goods to pass into Israel. So the only way of keeping the war industry supplied would be by the Sea. But Israel doesn’t have a navy strong enough to secure the Mediterranian and the Red Sea. There is simply limits, to what a nation of 9 million people can do economically to supply their war machine.

          Israel is too small to sustain a war without the US, UK or other big allies sending weapons and materials for weapon production.

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Which neighbours is Israel escalating with? Only thing I read is they are returning fire to Hezbollah’s ‘show-of-sympathy-attacks’ and their supply lines from Iran - which is something they have been doing for decades

        • They have been bombing in Lebanon, Syria and Jordania. They claim to only “retaliate” against Hezbollah, but bombing Beirut, Damascus and Aleppo shows, that they are going beyond just defending themselves against Hezbollah. They try to escalate with Iran, so the US has to commit to all out war in the Middle East. While Biden is still reluctant, many US Elites are heavily advocating for all out war in the Middle East, like it could be seen with the recent dehumanization and call for genocide article in the New York Times.

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            They have been attacking Iran’s weapon supply lines to Hezbollah, as they have been doing for several decades. And to prevent, not cause, escalation, they are never attacking Iran directly.

            • Neither the strike on Aleppo, nor Damascus nor Beirut were about supply lines. The attacks in Syria were a show of force and to antagonize Iran further, by showing that their forces are vulnerable there too.

              • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Do you think Iran arming Hezbollah and Hamas and installing a network of ‘logistical advisors’ is de-escalating the conflict?

                • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  I’m losing you here.

                  Hezbollah made clear in the beginning, that they are not interested in a stronger escalation. Your argument was that Hezbollah was supplied through these countries. Are you now claiming Hamas is supplied through them currently? There is about 200km of Israel, including most of the population centers between Lebanon and Gaza.

                  But to the other point. You seem to imply that escalation is partisan, e.g. there is the “good side” that is not escalating a conflict, when it uses violence and a “bad side” where any action in the conflict is seen as escalation, even actions preceeding violence. But that is not how conflicts work. You could just as easily claim that Iran had to arm these groups to prevent an escalation through deterrence. It would be equally silly.

                  In the currrent iteration of the conflict Israel is escalating things through attacking places that werent involved before to cause a stronger reaction, after Hezbollah showed in the beginning, that they were only interested in a “show of support” to Hamas but not a further escalation of fights.

                  If you look further at the motivations and opportunities of the actors, it becomes even more clear. Israel claims that Iran would have orchestrated the attack by Hamas. If that was the case, it would have made more sense for Hezbollah and other Iranian allies to immediately attack on 07. October or right after. Israel was in disarray, and the US didnt increase it’s military presence yet. Instead Hezbollah and Iran mostly left it at words, which indicates that Hamas was not acting on their behalf.

                  If we look at the motivation of Israel, we see a government that is extremely fragile, with a ptime minister charged with multiple crimes, who has failed his people on his only promise of safety and hasno support left in the public. The only thing keeping Netanyahu in power is a continued war. The global sentiment is changing, as Israel is now held responsible for its actions in Gaza at the ICJ and the arguement of “self defense” is less and less accepted with the level of destruction and death in Gaza. Israel needs to escalate tensions in order to stabilize international support.

  • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Do it then. I see the lips moving and the empty promises made, so do something about it then old man. Trump was the same way. Just spouting all these great sounding things that the news print and then never doing a god damn thing about any of it. That’s what they do, they say things you want to hear. Then do the opposite

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        To be fair, some of the things he promised were good, like a superior replacement for the ACA. We just tend to forget those promises because they were so obviously bullshit from the moment the words left his mouth.

  • Melkath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ah, so he wants to make sure that everyone gets funding, not just Israel.

    How about NO MONEY TO THE MOTHER FUCKING GENOCIDE?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, what we need is the opposite bill: the one that helps Ukraine but not Israel.

    • ra1d3n@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      He is not a dictator, you know? The other side argues for only genocide.

      • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, the lack of civic knowledge is sometimes frightening. I’m not one to say “both sides!”, but in this case, I see it on both the left and right: people who don’t seem to understand that most major bills in the US pass through compromise. This is true even when one party has a majority, because the US has some of the weakest party discipline of any system (eg people can vote against their party).

          • Melkath@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            The mental gymnastics.

            They clearly dropped the “the only good thing about Biden is that he isnt Trump, which is why you must vote for him” logic.

            You dipshits are just getting categorically rejected on that logic so you are getting more vague about it so you can keep trolling.

            • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              You are acccusing them of invoking a thing that only you invoked and when you’re called out on it, you accuse everyone else of “mental gymnastics”?

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    The president hears the people no longer agree with our stance on Israel

    The president changes his policies to reflect the will of the people

    This is how it’s supposed to work!

    • It’s unfortunate that I have run into people that don’t believe that. I once got called a flipflopper because I commented one stance based on inaccurate information I had, and was given new accurate information which changed my mind.

      People be treating reality like a high school debate club and just sticking with a position because that’s what they choose at the beginning. You can change your mind. Especially if it’s based on new information you didn’t have before.

      • Chocrates@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Right? I knew that Gaza was bad before this conflict but I didn’t have any real information. I then went and educated myself and I have a pretty firm opinion on the subject now which is different than it used to be.

      • Randelung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Highschool debate club has failed if that’s what people compare actual debate to. It’s necessary to take a firm stand in a discussion, even being devil’s advocate is fine, as long as it happens objectively.

        But I guess HS debates just end after three rounds and then no retrospective happens about what stance (not WHO) was right and why.

        TL;DR HS debates were supposed to be better than this.

        • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          To be fair: My high school fuckin’ sucked.

          But also: judged competitions don’t usually see one side agree with the other after hearing their side… That seems like a sure fire way to lose the competition.

          • Randelung@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah during the debate you defend your position, but the retrospective after is lost. The thing that would connect the whole simulation to reality.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nothing, it’s an alternate usage like greentext from 4chan to show a summarized sequence of events that I’m responding to.

    • Thats not what is happening though is it?

      The republicans want to kill funding for Ukraine, humantiarian aid and better protection of jewish and muslim places of worship against US domestic terrorism.

      So they propose a “fund Israel only” bill, that Biden has to veto on and they can cry out against. He still wants the IDF to receive that money though, so they can continue destroying what is left of Gaza and kill and drive out even more people.

          • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            You realize there are no “good guys” in that war, right? There’s a grey area and a shit ton of nuance to it all. Not to mention a shit ton of history. Only a child sees this as a “which side should I chose be on” situation, and then goes to the intern to beat people over the head with their choice.

            For the record, when I was much younger, I was an idealist also. And like the kids today, I also had no idea what I was taking about.

                • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  But it’s not just Hamas being slaughtered, all of Palestine is targeted by the IDF. There are other groups besides Hamas fighting. And there is one side who is stealing land and killing record numbers of children and aid workers, and has been for decades.

            • beardown@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              You’re refusing to answer the question:

              What does Biden specifically want re: Gaza?

              • GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I’m not qualified to know- which is why I don’t make assumptions. I cannot begin to understand politics at that level and what happens behind closed doors. And neither do you. I at least know that he doesn’t want genocide.

                But don’t let this stop you from creating a narrative.

                • beardown@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  So your point is that no one should criticize the United State despite the truth being ambiguous. Makes sense.

                  Maybe you should familiarize yourself with why the International Court Justice ruled that Israel was plausibly committing a genocide. Perhaps that would clear some things up for you

            • Nowhere did i say that there is a “good guy”.

              Israel can only continue to subjugate the Palestinians in Gaza to these inhumane conditions, if they receive continued support from the US. All public calls for moderation have been ignored or renounced, yet the US continues to increase its military aid to Israel. Israel is not only facing a case of genocide, where the highest court of the world deemed it “plausible” that Israel is committing genocide and also demanded specific actions and omissions to prevent genocide by Israel. High ranking Israeli officials, including the President, the Prime Minister, the minister of Defence and high ranking army officials have been explicitly called out by the ICJ for a rhetoric that is indicative of genocidal intent.

              If a child is told by its parents not to set things on fire, but at the same time is given another lighter and gasoline, it is clear that the parents do want the child to continue. Even more so as many other parents have told the child to stop and the parents defended their child against those people.

              The US has all the means to stop Israel. Instead they are enabling Israel even further. If you want nuance, don’t just look at the words. Look at the actions taken.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      that dickhead speaker

      “Dickhead” is such a vast understatement it almost feels more like downplaying.

      “That traitorous, christofascist, Russian shill speaker” better conveys the depths of the motherfucker’s depravity.