• someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    So are commercial randomly placed, or are the shows paced to have commercial breaks like the old tv days?

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The thing I always noticed when a service places their own ads, is even when there are “ad breaks” on the timeline, the ads don’t always show up there. Or the screen blacks out for a few seconds, then the show plays, THEN the ad would play.

      Granted, this was a while ago when I actually put up with that bullshit, so maybe it’s changed by now. But it was done very, very sloppily and is almost certainly a creator’s worst nightmare for the story.

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Content providers can probably include chapter markers in their content. I also suspect it’s not hard to detect a scene transition. Failing these, randomly placed.

      • rdyoung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        This was my problem with hulu back in the day. Short episodes like Futurama would have a commercial shoved in at like 3 minutes and then again at 10 or whatever, it was obnoxious and shittily implemented.

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because they HAVE to increase their share values year after year; just making billions isn’t good enough, they have to make more billions compared to the last year.

    It’s truly pure greed, as streaming was amazing when it first started, and Netflix was making a killing even back then. But now, nope, fuck you all, we want more and more until we can’t squeeze anything more out from you.

    It’s why I’ve increased my kodi/real debrid usage over the past few years

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve tried to argue a company that made $800k profit this year even tho they made $900k last year is still a profitable business and people unironically argue that company is dying and bad…

  • Xenny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I let all my streaming subscriptions die off when my debit card expired this year and I haven’t looked back. Gaming is cheaper and more entertaining. All the new movies I would want to watch never make it to streaming services anyway (without an additional rental fee)

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s all fine and good but I want to point out so everyone can watch out for this - sometimes if you have a subscription and your card expires or gets lost/stolen and replaced, companies can somehow get your new card info without you giving it to them and keep your shit active. So you can’t assume that a new card will take care of old subscriptions that you totally forgot about. You have to check your statements.

      • ManosTheHandsOfFate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s some bullshit. I hate that they can do that. They spin it as a convenience but I’d rather update all my accounts with the new card manually.

        • Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I had to deal with rhis with Doordash. Someone was making purchases on there with a card. I called an cancelled the card and get a replacement. Charges start coming in on the new card. Cancel and replace again. Charges still keep coming. I finally had to yalk to Doordash for hours to get them to remove the original card.

          What an absolute anti-feature.

          • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I think you might be able to call your bank and ask them to turn off this “service”

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah if you buy good games they have a much better cost to entertainment ratios than having a bunch of streaming services do. It’s the games I end up not liking that ruin it.

  • TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Even if the creators weren’t pissed, the entire selling point of streaming was on demand, ad free, and a large library to choose from. Every single streaming service that subdivided Netflix and Hulu’s content shares have reneged on that entire concept by creating smaller libraries, making them unaffordable, and now they’re shoehorning in ads if we won’t cough up more money.

    It’s almost like a moral imperative to pirate from these fuckers.

    • HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      In my opinion, some people get what they deserve. If you trust any corporate media concern to not succumb to enshittification, then you deserve to watch your stupid commercials. You paid for the privilege because you enabled the abuser.

      I prefer to get what I pay for and I pay for nothing. If I watch ads, it’s because I’m watching something like the Super Bowl with my OTA DVR that’s playing on network TV. It’s free, so OK - commercials. If I’m watching anything else, it’s on my Plex server and there are no commercials.

      I do pay for entertainment. I pay for experiences, like going to the movies, going to live rock shows, going to performances or exhibitions - all IRL - but that’s about it. I might consider paying for other entertainment options but there is one thing I won’t ever do: I won’t pay for media that I don’t own.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        “People deserve to be exploited because they dared to use a convenient, affordable service.”

        Seriously, what a bad take. It’s not like I gave them all my passwords and Power of Attorney! It’s fine your budgeting decisions work for you, but you shouldn’t cheer on companies providing a bad experience to customers that “trusted” them…

      • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You understand that someone has to pay for that entertainment shit you use to kill your time with? You are literally shitting on people who are paying for you.

    • PorkSoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Don’t forget that on-demand is being reduced as well now that many platforms are trickling out episodes for their marquee shows at a weekly rate. Looking at you Apple.

      • MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I much prefer the trickle of releases to a lump season dump.

        It allows time to digest, discuss and catch up throughout the release schedule if you’re invested in the story. You can convince your friends to watch a few episodes to catch up and then watch the end of the season together. You can read fan theories online, formulate your own, and overall each weekly episode can result in a lot of engaging fun interactions.

        With a series dump you have to binge it and wait for others to do the same in order to talk about it. The whole time you’re actively avoiding spoilers from friends/coworkers and avoiding reading about it online. The end result is you disengage from the fandoms/communities while you are getting through the show, which to me takes a lot of the fun out of a big show.

        I compare the difference between Stranger Things and GoT. To me these are probably two of the most significant pop-culture releases in the last decade or so.

        Game of Thrones resulted in hundreds of thousands of theories every week online and in public. T-Shirts were made based on popular online theories that never panned out in season. You would rag on friends who guessed the plot twist wrong and deify those who got their predictions spot on. Especially in my demographic the two months GoT was on was all about GoT.

        Stranger Things on the other hand, while still wildly popular hits differently. It’s much more of a build up to release, a week or two of “man that was awesome” followed by “I hope they make the next season soon.” Retroactive discussions happen for a while, but the discussions and the hype fizzles much more quickly.

        If I want to watch a trickle release show in one dump, I still can, I just wait until the whole season out, reactivate the subscription. Then I binge it.

        For me it’s much more fun to have an episode or two a week and build momentum through a season than it is to set off a one time firework.

      • Firenz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        There is a simple solution for that. Rotate your services every 3 months, watch the entire season and only come back when there’s something to watch.

        Quality over quantity is something streaming services can’t do. There’s so much shit shoved in our faces that I find myself watching less and less. Is a crash on the horizon or can the market sustain the number of active participants?

        It’s a real shame because piracy is bridging the service gap which the industry themselves managed to eliminate, albeit briefly, only to introduce it again.

    • Wojwo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The entire selling point of cable was no signal loss and ad free… Then the point of satellite was more options and ad free. Those sneaky ads keep finding their way in.

      • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ads is basically free money for broadcasters. And since greed is the main motivation - the dissension seems to be rather easy for them.

        • Wojwo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          But it’s not greed! It’s increasing share holder value! /s

          • dankm@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Damn right! It’s somebody else’s greed! Totally different.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is why I’m sailing the high seas again.

    Because the underlying conditions are the same as last time.

  • jaybone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It is worse than broadcast.

    If you learn anything about screenwriting, there are certain patterns and structures you follow (like acts in a play) to accommodate commercials, like to build suspense and keep the viewer interested and not changing the channel.

    Streaming never had this, if you look at shows written for these platforms. The writers either ignored or didn’t even know about these conventions.

    Now adding commercials later, it is even more annoying to the viewer as the original material was not meant to accommodate them.

    Streaming just keeps fucking up. I already canceled my netflix. I’m on basic cable for network tv and I just pirate everything else.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Get an hdhomerun or equivalent for local TV at home in a streaming format. It even integrates into Plex for DVR.

      • pirat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        A cheaper solution (if you’re already running a server) would be TVheadend and a cheap USB-dongle for DVB-T, DVB-C or DVB-S.

    • laverabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why are you on basic cable for network tv? It’s broadcast over the air in HD for free.

    • VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      By streamers ignoring all the decades of broadcasting experience, and all established what’s fair air-time for both content and commercial. That’s the frustration… they’re rewriting standards… “my company, my content, my timings, my bottom-line”. And doing it poorly. And at top speed.

    • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      And with streaming, you’re not locked into a 42-47 minute long episode either, so are some episodes going to have more, or is there someone with a stop watch going “this seems like a good place for an ad break”?

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Wait… They add advertising in the middle of shows? I thought it would be at the beginning, between episodes, on the UI, etc.

      • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nope, it’s classic ad breaks, but since the shows weren’t made expecting them the ads just appear suddenly every X minutes instead.

  • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Paid services with ads are unconscionable and should not be supported, but I do watch Tubi or Pluto sometimes, and it’s not nearly as bad as the amount of ads I see on my parents’ screen with cable

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Agreed, in my experience Tubi and Pluto both have very reasonable length, good quality ads. I declined to re-up on YouTube TV for NCAA football season this year specifically because I can stand their ads. At that price tier, they honestly expect me to sit through My Pillow ads??

  • cozy_agent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Got Disney plus subscription for free through some other stuff I need to have, but it’s the ad supported standard plan, you pay and still get loads of ads. Even with the subscription I just download stuff for my Jellyfin.

  • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Stop supporting greedy bastards that are trying to push hard psychological manipulation down you throat, only for you to buy so shit no-one needs.

    • Sinistar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s so weird that everybody knows how bad propaganda is and yet we let corporations do it to us hundreds of times per day every single day.

  • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Anf it’s a heave-ho-hi-ho, comin’ down the Bay

    Stealin’ films and movies and all the other games

    And it’s a ho-hey-hi-hey, corpos bar your doors

    When you see the Jolly Roger on Francisco’s mighty shores!

    Well, you’d think the local corpos would know that I’m at large

    But just the other day I found an unprotected RAR

    I snuck up right behind them and they were none the wiser

    I grabbed the film and “stole” it, and screwed the advertiser

  • ScaNtuRd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I haven’t used streaming services in a couple of years. Now I’m just doing all piracy and watching it through my Jellyfin server

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It just requires so much more foresight in planning what you’re going to watch.

      • zaphod@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Streaming services aren’t much better, they regularly didn’t have what I wanted to watch and I’m not subscribing to more than one. Now I’m subscribing to none and watch what I want instead of what Netflix has available.

      • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s a fair criticism but I find the drawbacks to be quite tolerable compared to the benefits. Each person must do their own calculus. As the user above alluded to, there are apps which make the experience almost seamless. My two favourite apps ever are Radarr and Sonarr.

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I can request a show, do a load of laundry and have it available. I’ve decent enough Internet where a movie can be available in as little as 5 minutes if it finds a nice little hevc webrip. I get that it’s not instant but a proper setup can have you rocking and rolling in under an hour.

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Kinda, Plex still changes my homepage with their ads once in a while

        • arc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Is there a media server that allows accounts to have groups of profiles?

          Even emby, or jellyfin don’t support this. Really wish they did. Then I can give each household a single account for their device and have a netflix like experience

          • retrieval4558@mander.xyz
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m not really sure what you mean by “groups” of profiles, but you can definitely set up multiple different users on Jellyfin

            • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I wonder if what they’re asking for is some sort of RBAC? All members of house A can all access content A and cannot access content B. But each individual retains distinct viewing history.

              • cygon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                You can set up different user accounts and grant them different levels of access and functionality (i.e. disallow CPU-hogging transcodes). Users can also be restricted by MAC and hidden from the login screen unless you know the exact login name.

                I have Jellyfin on my NAS and the “TV” user with which the living room TV is logged in only has permission to see certain folders of my movie library.

              • Im_old@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                yes. My kids have an account that can only see kids stuff (and they are not admins either of course). I have admin rights. My wife can see everything but no admin rights. If you mean “I need a KIDS group where I can put all my kids’ accounts so they inherit the same permissions” then no.

          • Clent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I would pay for someone to have a server that tracked who watched something. Not just assume the “account owner” watched it but the other people sitting next to them too.

            Apparently the creators of these apps are all loners.

          • pirat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Jellyfin allows you to hide any profile from the login screen. If you hide them all, every user would have to manually login (username+password). That’s not quite the Netflix-like experience where you click your profile, but it would at least hide all the users from other households (but also your own).

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Given that I have a lifetime Plex pass, what are the advantages that jellyfin would give me?

          I got the Plex pass years ago when they were on sale, and it’s nice that Plex has apps for mobile devices and smart TVs.

  • Copernican@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    TV economics are hard. I think where basic cable and network TV make it work is that the content was filmed in a way to have natural ad breaks to make it less disruptive to the viewing experience. That becomes terrible when you shoehorn ads into places they don’t belong. On the other hand, watching that content without ad breaks that was filmed with ad breaks also plays out weird because you’ll have that commercial cliffhaner music/scene that is quickly followed with resolution before you have time to wonder “what is going to happen?” So shit gets weird when you have a tier model where some people get ad breaks and others don’t because your content isn’t made to satisfy both use cases.

    TV is expensive to make and these are businesses that make money. A simple reductive “if user pays any money they deserve no ads” problem. It’s a challenge of things like “The business needs to make X dollars per user and if we have ads we need to charge Y bucks where Y = X - expected ad revenue.” The other challenge is in order to have an ad business you need to convince advertisers you have ad viewers they want to reach. Well, advertisers like rich people with lots of money, and they probably don’t have the cheaper ad supported tiers. So can a TV company really support a completely ad free tier? Or do they still need to serve some, but less ads, to make sure their advertisers know they can get their ads seen by the platforms richest users?

    • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s an industry that’s earning literal billions every single year…they absolutely don’t need to have ads, they could serve their paying users a good ad-free product, and still make money. They choose to deliberately annoy their paying customers because they’re fucking greedy.

        • DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’m not talkong about streaming services in an isolated case, I’m talking about the entire company behind it. It only makes sense to evaluate them as a whole and not their subcategories in isolation from the rest of their company.

          Paramount, Disney and HBO are profiting in the billions.

          • Copernican@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            You were talking about the streaming platform specifically as an industry.

            it’s an industry that’s earning literal billions every single year…they absolutely don’t need to have ads, they could serve their paying users a good ad-free product, and still make money. They choose to deliberately annoy their paying customers because they’re fucking greedy.

            It’s okay to be corrected.

      • Plopp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        They choose to deliberately annoy their paying customers because…

        Capitalism. Must not only make profits, and must not only make the same profits as last time, but must make MORE profits. They must always increase or else you’re declining according to capitalism. The greed is built in to the system.

        Fuck the system.

    • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean, it’s pretty simple for me in that I won’t pay for a streaming service that has ads. Others might, but I don’t care what others pay for. I left cable for this reason and I’ll leave its next incarnation if that is to be.