• Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    why is it the US is hellbent on making everything a state by state issue but at the same time saying federal law is above state law in such cases like Texas but states with legal cannabis or states with legal abortion are allowed to be above federal

    is the US the United States or not

    make it make sense

    • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The things that the federal government is responsible for are laid out in the Constitution, everything the Constitution does not place into the responsibilities of the federal government is left to state or local authorities.

      Tenth Amendment:

      Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      make it make sense

      We’re a slightly tighter coupled EU with less history of separation. We’re states that are united. Not one big ol unified country.

    • Melllvar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The idea of checks and balances on the exercise of government powers extends to even the state/federal relationship.

  • sndrtj@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why did this take the IRS so long where other nations have been doing this for decades?

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Same reason why our Healthcare system is fucked, it being fucked helps the Insurance Companies make money.

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Turbotax, H&R Block, and the other tax companies are massively wealthy companies that actively lobby to push laws to keep them from being simple. There are states that they have managed to bar the same thing from happening in.

      • Conyak@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        To clarify, TurboTax isn’t the company, it is Intuit. They are pretty shitty when it comes to lobbying congress on this.

        • ExfilBravo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          They are also the de-facto place for large companies that need automated payroll. So some people (like me) get paid by the same crooks.

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The other guy linked the answer, but I’m going to explain it anyway:

      In the US, companies have the freedom to bribe lobby our congress members by giving them money that’s totally unrelated to their vote you guys. The reasoning behind that being ok is that the congress official in question is still technically free to vote however they choose despite the money given to them. The reason lobbying works is the threat that the congress person might not get that money next time if they vote against that company’s interests.

      Just so you all know, because our congress members make a government salary of about 150k-250k/year, it’s surprisingly cheap (from a rich company perspective) to lobby them, with lots of payments being in the low thousands. So for obscenely wealthy companies (like intuit), it’s much cheaper to pay just enough guys off to kill a movement than for them to suffer the actual consequences of that movement.

      In this case, intuit’s entire business model depends on American taxes seeming like this mysterious and unapproachable thing that Americans have to pay a third party for in order to not get thrown in jail by the IRS. And given that intuit (and companies like H&R block) rake in billions each year, it’s comparatively pennies to pay off congress officials to keep it that way.

      -> 'Merica

    • ma11en@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Most nations don’t require you to do anything other than check your payslips unless your situation is complex.

      • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ehh, in the Netherlands you need to report all bank accounts, home value, income from salary and contracts and a fuckton more.

        It’s all done via a web app made by the Tax Authority.

  • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Just a heads up it’s only available for the following states:

    Arizona California Florida Massachusetts Nevada New Hampshire New York South Dakota Tennessee Texas Washington state Wyoming

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Which is funny considering this is only for federal and not state taxes. Do they say why it’s limited to specific states?

      • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Most of the listed states do not have state level income taxes. The only exceptions are Arizona and California. The rest of the states have no state level income tax. Alaska is the only state without a state level income tax that isn’t included in this IRS scheme.

        I imagine there is a reason all but two of the chosen states lack a state level income tax.

        • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          State taxes are probably an additional complication in the calculations that hasn’t been implemented yet for all states. And for those without a state income tax not covered, probably some other state-tax-adjacent thing

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Massachusetts does. Per the IRS site, the tool won’t help file it, but will lead you to another tool that does.

      • evatronic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s a trial program, to work out the major kinks, issues, and problems before rolling it out further to other states.

        It’s also federal-only, meaning you still have to do your state returns. Most of the states in the trial have no state income tax, which makes it an ideal solution for taxpayers in those states.

        Expect it to expand to all 50 states in the coming years, presuming Republicans don’t somehow manage to legislate it into oblivion like usual.

  • mindlight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    As a non US citizen this is just a Robin Williams in Jumanji moment…

    WHAT YEAR IS IT?!?!

    Anyways, welcome to the year of the interwebs.

    Have you got rid of your cheques and faxes yet? 😉

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I thought I had gotten rid of cheques, but I had to get a book specifically to get my passport.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Faxes… No, no we have not gotten rid of them. On the other hand, that means shenanigans are still available!

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      my wife is disputing a Healthcare charge. Went to a specialist 13 times, they reimbursed us 9 times but not the other 4, at a cost of about $800.

      we have to communicate with the appeals center by fax, and wait for their snail mail response.

    • klemptor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I still write checks, mostly to pay contractors and tip my hairdresser. I wrote a tip for a contractor the other day and made it out to cash. He said that was too old-school and he was afraid the bank wouldn’t accept it!

    • theatomictruth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I still write 2 cheques a year because my water bill can only be paid via physical mail (or in person I guess), I’m pretty sure fax is still common in our medical industry.

      • Confused_Emus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        What is it with water departments being such Luddites?! Having lived in a few different cities in a few different states, they always seem to be the one utility that’s the biggest pain in the ass to work with. Gotta go down to their city office to start service - make sure to bring a voided check if you want to set up an auto draft to pay the bill because they don’t take cards. Online account management? Nah, the closest they have to an online presence is their About page on the city website.

        WHY?!

    • jeremyparker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m in the USA and we’ve been able to file our federal taxes for free online for like a decade, I’m not sure what these people are talking about. What’s new here is that this is the IRS’s official tool.

      Previously we had to use an outside service – but it was – and still is – free for normal people/people with normal taxes (eg I have 3 kids and a mortgage and I use it every year). State taxes are another story – that’s usually about $20. And that probably hasn’t changed; state taxes have nothing to do with our IRS.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Except for the last several years it’s becoming harder to file for free. TurboTax’s free service developed some worse and worse dark patterns every year, where it was very easy to click the wrong thing and end up being charged. Iirc the fact that they provided a free service at all was to keep control of the market and prevent the IRS from stepping in with a service like this. ProPublica did some good investigations on this.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Beat me to it.

          Higher tax bracket Lemmings, note that Donate icon in the upper right of their excellent reporting. Reporters probably risking their lives with the stuff they uncover about the most powerful people.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh we can file our taxes online, we’re just required to pay massive amounts of money to a corporate middleman to do it.

      • webadict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh we can ___, we’re just required to pay massive amounts of money to a corporate middleman to do it.

        Basically America.

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t think I’ll ever be able to use it, since it doesn’t list capital gains as a supported type of income

    Unless that’s also related to it being a pilot

  • laverabe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m 100% for a simple IRS tax return but what the heck is with this?

    To use Direct File, you need an IRS account with ID.me.

    To get an ID.me account, you need to:

    Take a video of your face

    If you can’t or don’t want to take a video of your face, you can have a video call with an ID.me agent who will confirm that your face matches your identification.

    Is that really necessary???

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      In the UK, we typically have to do two forms of identification - usually a passport and a driving licence.

      I imagine that for many Americans, they don’t have a government issued id, whereas basically every Brit will have a driver’s licence for id so they can go out drinking.

      • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I imagine that for many Americans, they don’t have a government issued id

        That’s only the case in a few select cities, like New York. Most other people have an ID of some sort. (And, even if you don’t want a driver’s license, it’s still possible to get a government-issued ID that doesn’t let you drive but still verifies your identity.) The US is huge. It takes at least a few days to travel across it. And most of it, especially out in the Midwest, is still pretty rural.

        As for the “two forms of ID”, they actually require four types of documents (though some documents can be submitted for two or more of those things; at minimum, you need two documents total), at least in my state, when you first get a driver’s license. So most places will simply use your driver’s license by itself since it proves that you’ve already proven your identity. Anywhere that does require two proofs will usually use your social security card and your driver’s license.

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Stupid fraud prevention ugh!

      Listen folks, if you have a driver license, they already have your face, so settle down.

      • laverabe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        countries with no national ID cards and no plans for one: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK. 1

        And they do taxes just fine without a Harry Potter like gif of every tax payer.

        Privacy reasons aside, TurboTax doesn’t require a video clip to file your taxes so this is only raising the technical barrier against the widespread adoption of a simple tax system.

      • Sl00k@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t mind this being done through the government site, but it shouldn’t be done by a third party business.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s the same as going to a bank and letting the teller look at your face. It’s to prevent someone from stealing your identity using a picture of your ID.

      How can they verify the ID is real without physically seeing it? They look up the info but still need to verify that you are the person on the ID.

      • EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        How have they been verifying mailed in tax forms with no pictures for decades?

        Seems like it unnecessarily disenfranchises the poor and the elderly. You have to have access to equipment that can record you and the tech savvy to be able to use it.

        • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m pretty sure you’re required to provide your driver’s license info at some point during the sign-up process, actually. Though it’s been a while, so I don’t remember for sure.

          If it’s like I remember, it’s to confirm that the person on the ID matches the person who’s signing up. Banks do the same when the teller asks for your ID. And so do the people who ask for your ID when you go to vote. It’s the same basic process. It’s just digital instead of in-person.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ok but how come H&R Block doesn’t need to do this? I just give them my IRS PIN and the AGI from last year’s return. The picture shit feels like a poison pill

  • SecretSauces@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    For anyone who has filed with it, how much does this return differ from using a company? Is your total return the same or can a tax professional get you back a significant amount more?

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you have a simple return then it should be identical. There’s only one way to fill out form 1040 correctly. Its unclear if this will walk you through itemizing or more obscure deductions like other places do.

  • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Due to lack of public identity infrastructure, filing taxes online in Britain takes a long time. I mean, at least 10 minutes 😄

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It takes at least that long for me to figure out if I was a Lloyds underwriter on the second Tuesday after the third waxing moon every year.