The page you requested was removed.
Under Bill S-210, commercial websites that make pornography available would be required to verify that users who access the material are at least 18 years old. But the bill leaves the specifics of how this would be done to be determined later, through regulations. Critics have said this age verification process could compromise user privacy if it requires people to share personal information, such as photo identification.
On top of the privacy aspect I feel like this must be really easy to bypass with a minimum amount of effort.
The vague nature in the meantime seems like a massive red flag.
As a parent, this is a parenting/personal issue, fuck off and please spend my money doing useful things (like supporting health care, or housing) not attempting to protect my children.
Hey get out of here with all this rational common sense shit
/s
It’s a pretty basic common-sense. Children should not be viewing porn, that’s how they get groomed.
Thow irresponsible parents in prison !!
There’s a huge jump between “lets start separating mothers from their babies” and “lets make sure kids can’t just wander their way into porn”
I’m extremely hesitant when it comes to “Why won’t people think of the children” arguments. This kind of argument generally leads to removing rights.
This is the argument that anti-trans/anti-sex education group use to push their agenda.
Conservatives: We want small government!
Also Conservatives: We want the government to police anything we don’t like!
