- cross-posted to:
- games@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- games@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
For those who didn’t read the article:
- Palworld devs used generative AI in the past and think it’s a really good tool
- There is no proof that AI was used to create Pals even though that wouldn’t even be illegal or anything
- Pals are very clearly derivative of Pokemon since that was the entire inspiration
That’s literally it, this is just AI ragebait.
Pokemon invented all monsters, obviously
Watching the trailer gave me the impression as well. Of course Pokemon are based on real life animals, but they also a lot of unique designs. No way they made pals by accident that look like Hatterene and Garchomp but different colors.
What I don’t get is why this article is so shit. Can’t be that hard to let someone who played the latest Pokemon games install Palworld and make some comparisons themsevels instead of just sharing some Twitter posts. OK, actually in get it. That’s how modern videogame journalism works.
Who cares? It’s not like any of us are losing money on it. And Nintendo/game freak aren’t exactly known for their incredible iterative game designs. People have been bitching about Pokémon becoming a cashgrab since like…heartgold, hahah.
I wish Nintendo would go out on a limb like their era with Blue rescue team. I miss the deeper storylines and more personal atmosphere.
The game takes mechanics and inspiration from tons of games. Fortnite, Pokémon, Breath of the Wild, farming and crafting sims… that’s kind of the appeal honestly.
Fuck all of this incoming wave of AI generated crap
It’s no different to using store bought assets. Some games will use it well, others will flip it with minimal effort involved.
This was bound to happen since its so successful.
Also, this article is basically spreading slanderous misinformation. Its entirely speculation and conjecture, and until proven otherwise people need to remember that its “innocent before proven guilty.”
I am getting really tired of these “guilty because we decided already” witch-hunts going on these days.
Inspired with some feature similar to the original works != plagiarism. I swear a shit tons of people just don’t understand what’s the nature of plagiarism is at all before sprouting nonsense like this.
And no, that grin on a cat face isn’t original to Pokemon, Cat Bus from My Neighbour Totoro has it.
Also we’re past 1000 pokemon now and a huge number of them are based on actual animals, mythical creatures, pop culture references etc. There are going to be similarities and it’s completely unavoidable. You would drive yourself insane trying.
may as well let gamefreak have permanent patent on monster capture games at this point when people want only them to create any
The Cheshire Cat significantly predates Totoro.
Exactly, grin on cat is nothing original at this point, it’s as aesthetic as Picasso.
They know the difference. But some people just feel compelled to defend Nintendo no matter what.
Am a pokemon fans, and palworld seems mostly based on established pokemon roster, i can understand calling it uninspiring design but to go as far as call it plagiarism is quite funny.
