• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Does this stat take release date into account? Otherwise it seems like a pretty meaningless metric. An AAA game that releases in January is going to have better sales for the year compared to one that releases in October.

    • JowlesMcGee@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It doesn’t, but most game sales are front loaded at release. Having 8 months on the shelf still makes a difference, for sure, but it’s still notable that it was number 1.

    • iheartneopets@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If assholes wanna play a boring game to own the libs, then that’s on them, lmao. Similar to them buying barbie and bud light shit just to set it on fire when they are mad

      • Murvel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Own the trans-commubity you mean. And people played it because bassically nobody could give a rats ass about the boycott…

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I refuse to believe there are that many lame people on earth.

    Seriously what kind of diaper wearing loser wanted a fucking Harry Potter game? Have none of you fucks seen even one other fantasy series?

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      TBF the graphics, setup and intro were pretty good (esp if you’re a fan of the series). The problem was that it went absolutely nowhere after that, beyond “you’re at Hogwarts and it looks pretty”. I guess that was good enough for enough people to put it over the top.