• Rediphile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I can bitch about chrome all day long… but none of that bitching will be about incognito mode as that was and continues to be an useful feature that did exactly what I expected it to do. Everything it said it did, it did.

      Just because people made up their own imaginary ideas about what they think it does isn’t really Google’s fault. If people think snorkels allow them to scuba dive and then drown, I’m not about to blame the snorkel maker that wrote ‘diving googles and snorkel’ on the packaging.

    • Toes♀@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well you see, it’s used by virtually everything. So get used to it. is all I imagine people saying, not my opinion.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I switched away from chrome a while ago, but this is just stupid. Incognito has always said that it can’t stop sties from tracking you. It’s always been about stopping stuff from being stored locally. Here’s the message:

      If you read that and thought it did more than it said, that’s on you.

      • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think what people are complaining about is that Google itself is tracking you. Not just with cookies, but with the chrome browser. Everything you do goes back to Google, regardless of their silly Google analytics, JavaScript tag that people block.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Hey out of interest, did my comment just show up for you?

          Not just with cookies, but with the chrome browser

          Wow really? Has that actually been documented? Because yeah, that definitely changes things in my mind.

          • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Just like I woke up, but it was probably there for a while.

            Regarding documentation… I mean, it’s Google… C’mon. I’m sure there’s lots of stuff about them spying with minimal searching (don’t use Google.com though, hahaha)

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              it was probably there for a while

              Nah, it might not have been. Have been dealing with federation issues that I think may only have sorted themselves out mere minutes before your comment.

              I’m sure there’s lots of stuff about them spying with minimal searching

              Eh, not good enough. They’ve got a lot of spying, but this is a specific claim. It needs to be supported by specific evidence.

              It’s like when people claim that Google devices are constantly recording audio and sending it back to base. Nobody has ever found evidence of it, and claims that they are are usually better explained by things like “they are recording your geolocation, and the geolocation of people you’re with, and the things that the people you’re with are Googling”. That’s enough data on its own, there’s no need to reach for conspiratorial claims that lack evidence.

              If there’s actual evidence that the browser itself is sending tracking data back while in Incognito which links your non-incognito profile to what you’re doing incognito, I’m concerned. But if it’s just assumptions people are leaping to, I’m gonna go back to Occam’s razor and make fewer assumptions.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Incognito mode didn’t do what it was never advertised to do, and in fact does precisely what it always claimed. The horror!

      I swear people like you act like every day Google simply exists is a fresh outrage.

  • Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I find this very silly. Incognito always had disclaimers about how it doesn’t protect you from tracking. Do people not know Google is just a website that does taking (or did anyway) like any other? And how tf did Google lose that lawsuit when eulas have “this software isn’t fit for any purpose” clauses and incognito was never advertised for privacy to begin with and straight up tells you it doesnt give you privacy when you open it.

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      not protecting users from tracking is very different than wantonly tracking users yourself when they literally hit the privacy button

  • heyoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t use chrome but this is a whole lot of nothing. It’s basically saying if you save a file or an article to your reading list it’ll still be there…and that remote websites will still stuff your face with cookies and try to track you…but it’s not like they’re giving you a special chrome cookie to link your private and non private browsing. Server side tracking never goes away, not even with Firefox.

    Anyways, who cares. Delete chrome and start using Firefox. But again, make sure you delete the files you download in incognito or they’ll still be there. And your ISP can still see which domains you’re going to if you use them as your DNS.

  • uuhhhhmmmm@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I was always curious why is it called Incognito or Private mode? Temporary or Guest session would make more sense: “You’ve entered a Temporary session. Your browsing history and cookies will not be saved.”