• Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Aren’t the highs / lows what were forecast and the current temperature based on actual measurements from weather stations?

    I guess they don’t update the high/low to match observed readings.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s right in your title:

    predicted low

    Predictions are not guaranteed to occur, thats why they call it a prediction and not a prophecy.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not when it’s early morning. The temperature is on the rise from the previous night. The prediction you’re seeing is for the coming night.

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This depends on the implementation of whatever you are looking at. The weather app I use does integrate actual measurements in the forecast for today.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago
    1. Weather predictions are not 100% accurate.
    2. The place making the predictions may be using different instrumentation or be in a different location than the instrumentation used to give you real time info. This is also why what the app says it is and what a thermometer right in front of you says can also be different.
  • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Thermometer reading vs perceived temperature? Factoring in wind-chill, humidity, etc with “Realfeel” or some other estimate.

      • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        a) Forecasts are very resource-intensive, they are performed on a specific schedule using a computational forecast model. Updating the predictions would require inputting new data and running the model again, and by the time they do that, the next forecast will already be out.

        b) Do they know it’s wrong? Where did you get the temperature? From an official weather station? If not, there is no reason to imagine that someone is noticing that this one particular model run was wrong in one particular spot across the whole country and trying to fix it in real time.

        c) If you did get the current temperature from an official weather station, that IS your update for it. Real time data from official weather stations is always going to trump the forecast model. What would be the point of updating the forecast when the current measured data from the weather station is now available? That’s like driving down the highway and saying “I was predicting my speed would be close to 65mph, but due to the heavy traffic I’m seeing today, I’m going to re-estimate my speed to be 45mph” when you have a perfectly accurate speedometer right in front of you telling you exactly what speed you are going at all times. Forecasts are only useful for the future, and they can be wrong.