You must log in or register to comment.
I, uh…I don’t get it.
James Cameron will fuck you up if you don’t appreciate his amazing cinematography.
I think maybe because it’s a movie known for putting a lot of effort into high detail visuals so watching at low quality wastes the effort put into them? idk I didn’t watch it
James Cameron or Colonel Sanders?
Colonel Cameron
This is halarious entirely because I don’t understand it.
how can you get a bajillion dollars from a film and then act pretentious about how people watch it. who cares?
Artists.
Some years back when there was a bad quality demo leaked from Nightwish album, the head of the band was furious because people would judge the album based on that shit quality sample.
For some artists it’s important that the person experiencing the art can see and/or hear it as the artist intended. Which kinda makes sense that you’d want people to see the beat sidw, just like when selling a car
Don’t tell James but I saw the original Avatar as a grainy camrip with Russian subtitles and people walking in front of the screen
James Cameron: omae wa mou shindeiru
Yvan eht nioj
I honestly cannot understand why you would want to watch something on a smart watch. i can just about understand a tablet because it’s relatively portable, but even a phone is too small!
I watched YouTube on it once, because my phone died… and I was somewhere that I wanted to leave but couldn’t… So I was bored as fuck and that was the best thing I could do.
I think this is the first time I’ve seen avatar mentioned in nearly a year. Weird how a movie series that popular generates so little discussion.
Probably because it wasn’t any good? I couldn’t even get 20 minutes into my rental to get to the plot.
I saw it in IMAX 3D when it came out because I knew I wouldn’t be able to enjoy it at all at home. I was fighting sleep the entire last half, I kept waking up seeing something I thought was cool and trying to stay awake, but I still slept through most of the last ACT
I mean, a lot of people spent a lot of time discussing the first one, it just boiled down to
“It’s sci-fi Dances With Wolves, and it made a load of money.”
The sequel is the same thing, but with whales and even more explicit environmentalism/anti-colonialism
All of the social criticism is correct, but, like, do something about it, billionaire filmmaker? The discussion time is over.
“It’s sci-fi Dances With Wolves, and it made a load of money.”
Sci-fi Pocahontas is more accurate, but yeah, there’s just not much to talk about beyond the effects.
It’s because the movie is entirely about people of color (blue)
Nah, it’s because the dirty liberals changed them from their original skin color.
Which was a sort of greenish yellow-purple.
No, I mean the original in 1991
A grungy sort of beige plaid?
Kinda yeah
James Cameron doesn’t do what James Cameron does for James Cameron.
James Cameron does what James Cameron does because James Cameron is James Cameron.
