• Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, changing the user agent doesn’t change anything. I believe it’s the Widevine DRM level or rather the lack of support for L1. The whole point of DRM is to make it not easily circumventable, so the best solution is piracy.

      • tubbadu@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        So the “problem” is hardcoded where? changing the useragent will make the server give both Linux and Windows the same exact data I think, am I wrong? So it’s the browsers fault? Or there’s something I’m missing?

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          The user agent tells the web server what browser requests the website. It’s up to the server whether they ignore the user agent.

          DRM protected content isn’t just a http connection away, it’s encrypted content loaded after the initial website is displayed. The video is then decrypted by a proprietary DRM library called Widevine.

          Widevine has multiple security levels and Linux only supports the most basic one. This results in low bitrate/resolution with no way around it. The reason Linux only support L3 is that copyright holders don’t think Linux graphics stack gives them the same DRM guarantees that Windows/macOS/Android gives them.

            • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Unlikely, because Widevine works quite well at protecting it’s content. If the solution was as simple as using wine it’d be great though.

  • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is why even though I pay for prime, I pirate everything. It’s amusing to pay for a service that your experience is better pirating than using the service you pay for.

  • whoareu@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It doesn’t matter how much DRM you put into the service. someone can just spin up a Virtual Machine and install chrome, windows in it and then record the stream from the host system.

    • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wonder if a user agent switcher would be enough to fool them, or if they’re actually using an exclusive library or something.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        In-browser DRM usually uses a library called Widevine, which is a closed-source library created by Google that’s usually only used on Windows or MacOS.

        On Linux, you can use Google Chrome to get Widevine working. You can also extract the library from Google Chrome to use it with Chromium (e.g. see https://github.com/proprietary/chromium-widevine). The version of Chromium shipped with Linux distros doesn’t include it since you need a license and permission from Google to distribute it. Lots of Linux users would also (understandably) really not want to run a DRM binary on their system. It’s intentionally obfuscated to try and prevent people from breaking it.

        I don’t know what other Linux browsers do - I haven’t used Linux desktop for a while (going to switch back soon though). On other OSes, browsers like Firefox and Brave prompt you the first time you try to watch DRM’d content, asking if you’d like to download the plugin. I assume they license it from Google.

        Also as far as I know, Widevine doesn’t allow the same security/compliance levels on Linux as it does on Windows and MacOS, as the OS is less locked down. This could mean that a 4K video streaming service works fine on Windows but won’t allow you to stream in 4K on Linux. Isn’t DRM great???

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      whatever resolution I went out of my way to download.

      Addon Radarr, Sonarr, and Ombi and you won’t even have to do that.

      Users make requests via Ombi, those get sent to Radarr/Sonarr to search for and download. Most stuff is ready to watch ~15min after requesting, with no interaction from the servers admin needed. (optionally, requests can require approval before downloading, that’s disabled for the users I trust)

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      or I guess spoof your user agent

      That won’t help. The issue is Widevine DRM protection level. It’s the same issue everywhere.

          • RockyBass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Streaming services like netflix and prime helped reduce piracy to all time lows. But then corps started getting stupid again and making their own exclusive streaming services, requiring you to have 20 subscriptions just get all the same shit you had with 2. Now drm enforcement on top of that and piracy is back on the rise…

  • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    We need some mad genius to crack Widevine and make a plugin that works for Linux.

    It’s going to have to be restricted-source, but hey, honestly we need to break Google’s stranglehold anyways.

  • r0bi@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    And yet their servers are using Linux to host a subpar experience for Linux clients.

    Hey Amazon, use Windows and MacOS servers (lolz) instead for HD/UHD stream hosting!