Pornhub blocks Montana and North Carolina as their age verification laws take effect | The website says the states’ ID requirement would put users’ privacy at risk::Montana and North Carolina are the latest to join the list of states with age verification laws for adult platforms.

  • Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    So pornhub would rather let kids watch porn than comply with age verification laws

    • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      So parents would rather let kids watch porn than comply with age verification laws

      FTFY. Pornhub doesn’t have kids, parents and guardians do. Unlike schools, Pornhub has zero in loco parentis rights or responsibilities. Instead, parents and guardians do.

      But in Utah and NC, recognizing the futility of being able to comply with the laws as written, Pornhub is OVERCOMPLYING.

      In those states, Pornhub is ensuring that NO ONE of ANY age watches their content. (And you’re fooling yourself if you think this has fuck all to do with protecting minors anyway.)

    • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      What kind of a parent are you if you’re not blocking access to these kinds of sites on the devices of your kids?

    • TugOfWarCrimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      No. They would rather effective age verification that doesn’t negatively impact the privacy and liberties of their users. They want a solution, not just a ham fisted excuse to start building the foundations of a social credit system

      • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        While care is required, designing a system that only proves that someone is over a specific age is possible without leaking much additional information.

        For example a request for age verification can be generated and signed by the porn site. All it needs is a unique ID and the signature. It should expire quickly and can only be used once.

        The person identifying themself can send this request to a certifying party (the government in the EU where we trust governments, or I guess some terrible for profit company in the USA because they privatize everyday). The certifying party can sign the request, since they know how old the person is.

        The person then returns this verification to the porn site.

        In this scenario the porn site never learns anything about the user other than that they are above a given age. The certifying party only knows that the person has gotten an age verification, but not why or where.

        There is still possible collusion between the porn site and the verifying party, but in that case the system is not really needed at all. Also metadata tracking is possible (like when a person gets a request and has network traffic to a porn site), but can be mitigated if a user is concerned.

    • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m just not an authoritarian. I don’t like the government spying on us as it is. Why would I volunteer to give up even more privacy? Consider installing cameras in your home and give the government access to them if you want. Totes just to make sure the kids aren’t doing anything wrong. I’ll skip.

      Party of small government!