• AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a nothing article. There’s no reason to have ever assumed it was a constitutional right

    There’s plenty of other, much better reasons to justify the need for stable climate.

  • Bobby_DROP_TABLES [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    requires the federal government to maintain a climate that supports human life.

    maybe-later-kiddo

    Unironically this is a new frontier of ghoul behevior. The next time a person tells me some shit like Biden is “the most progressive president since FDR” I’m straight up spitting in their face.

  • HowMany@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Which leads directly to the statement “there is no constitutional right that the government will protect the citizens of this country from harm”.

    Then what the fuck do we need government for?