A gel injected into the scrotum could be the next male contraceptive::Biotech company Contraline has safely implanted a sperm-blocking hydrogel in 23 men. It’s designed to be a fully reversible vasectomy.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    A vasectomy in my twenties was the best decision I ever made.

    10/10, would snip, tie and burn again.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    More options are great I suppose, but as a gem-xer I don’t get the modern revolt against the condom. Modern condoms are pretty damn thin / good and are a form of male birth control with bonus of very good disease prevention, have next to no side effects, and minimize messes too.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This kind of thing pops up repeatedly. There’s some big, splashy news about a male contraceptive, and then it flames out, or ends up being vaporware.

    The problem is that you need to stop a few million sperm with every single ejaculation; reducing that number by 99% means that you’re still risking pregnancy. Severing the ductus deferens (a vasectomy) means no sperm get through; trying to clip or block them means that some can potentially get through. Hormonal BC has the same issue; while it significantly reduces sperm count, it may not eliminate it entirely. (And there can be some really significant negative side effects from eliminating endogenous testosterone production, since hormonal levels need to be pretty far out of whack before there’s a really big cut in sperm production.)

    OTOH, women have to stop two eggs per month, or stop them from being implanted in the uterine wall. A 99% reduction in fertility for women means that it’s very, very unlikely that they’re going to be able to get pregnant.

    (Yes, women suffer from hormonal BC as well, but some women need it just to be able to live normal lives. It’s overall less of a problem than it ends up being for men. And women have the option of an IUD as well.)

    Personally, I’m in favor of vasectomy; it’s allowed me to avoid having any children for 20-odd years now.

    • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You mean we can’t blame the patriarch for under investment in men’s contraceptives and that it’s actually biology to blame? I’m SHOCKED.

      Also, maybe I don’t want a needle stuck into my balls.

      Maybe my partner taking oral contraceptive is better to ensure she doesn’t get pregnant.

      Also are women supposed to just trust guys, or are they going to protect themselves every time.

      Maybe the real reason we don’t have a male oral contraceptive is because the female ones protect the female first and foremost because people suck.

  • stown@sedd.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Is this not the exact same thing as vasalgel? How is this new or different?

  • KinNectar@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Vaselgel is too cheap to manufacture to get the funding it needs to bring it to market, that’s why they have been trying for 20 years and haven’t succeeded yet. In the US the rights are owned by a non profit Parsemu Foundation formed to fund it. It looks like their private partner NEXT Life Sciences is actually set to come to market with a vaselgel product in 2026 they are calling Plan A.

    https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/next-life-sciences-announces-launch-of-plan-a-birth-control-for-men-301779007.html

    Interesting marketing choice comparing it to the Plan B pill.