Faster than ever: Wi-Fi 7 standard arrives::How fast do you want your Wi-Fi to go? How does 5.8 Gigabits per second sound? Fast enough for you?

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Will it make my ISP give me more internets to push through that WiFi? No? Then it isn’t going to change my world, sadly.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      My upload speed is 10mbit/s. It’s 2024, and this is ridiculous. I pay over $80 a month for this internet in one of the largest cities in the United States. I live in a very populated part of the city, too.

      I fucking hate ISP’s.

    • brian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      While I think most agree with you, it’s important to note there is more to networking than WAN access. Streaming 4k in your home network over WiFi sounds pretty awesome for security cameras and other self-hosted medias.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Who needs 4k security camera footage streaming in their own home?

        The media center is far more relevant here, but again, current speeds are pretty adequate for the majority of people.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sure, though in my world none of my networking needs exceed the capabilities provided by the current WiFi generation, thus it remains unchanged. Nor will I see any benefit from it unless I conduct a thorough review and replacement of all impacted devices in my world to also accommodate WiFi 7, which I will not be doing.

  • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Eh. Even streaming media from a local server isn’t really going to improve with this over current standards, at least not for me. I’m honestly not sure there’s much need for it.

    Really, I think we need to make better use of what we already have first, it feels like the more capacity and speed we get, the sloppier we get with anything resembling efficiency for any component. We’re not getting better results for it, if anything it seems to be a net negative, everything seemed to run faster and better ten years ago with a fraction of the capabilities

      • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean, I’m not saying it doesn’t have its uses, just… I dunno, for most use cases it just feels like solving a bloat issue by raising the capacity, which just leads to more bloat.

        I’m not sure PCVR has enough useless or unoptimized overhead for my complaint to apply to it, but for most things, I think it’s past time to stop throwing more resources at it and address the underlying problem.

        Agile development.

        (I’m kidding, but only a little bit honestly)

    • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Soon, we’ll be measuring it in stone throws

      e.g.: I can get a moderate signal here three stone throws away from my router!

  • schizoidman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Unfortunately routers with wan speeds above gigabit remain expensive. I would assume that will be the case until faster than gigabit internet reaches mainstream worldwide which will be a very long wait…