• R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 months ago

    The short term benefits are the reason they’re doing this in the first place.

    Immediate revenue and growth is the goal, long term business viability and consumer base is an acceptable sacrifice to meet that goal.

    Who cares if the company went under five months after I left! When I was the CEO we had record profits

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Who cares if the company went under five months after I left! When I was the CEO we had record profits

      Then they re-hire you for an exorbitant price to fix the problems you created. The Bob Iger technique.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Or you have a golden parachute clause so you leave with $3.6mil as everything burns around you.

    • antrosapien@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      How come it is sustainable when executives or even workers are not even interested in their own product. I know a few devs at some mid sized company and they don’t even care about what they are working on

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        There is such a huge sludge of dumb and inane softwares that inevitably some people will work on things that they don’t care about.

        Some people just want the paycheck and that’s fine.

  • Mischala@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    8 months ago

    but we want more money… And therefore deserve it. I don’t see what the problem is here

    • every CEO ever, I presume
    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Isn’t that a novel idea. Just work to make things better and if you succeed you have profits and if you don’t back to the drawing board.

      Ahhh, what a world we could live in. Back to slumming I guess.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t forget Hasbro trying to pull a retroactive licensing for all D&D stuff. Oh, and sending the Pikertons to harass a person that got set of cards before release by accident

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Sending Pinkertons after a civilian was extremely fucked up, especially for a fuckup they made. The Pinkertons are basically a neo-nazi militia.

  • KredeSeraf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    I still can’t believe all that BS and with the escapist, losing Yhatzee must be a devastating blow to their value.

  • Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Unity has been shitty since they merged with Ironsource. They’re an Ad company now (notice how mobile ads sometimes have the familiar Unity logo now? Yeah that’s why)

  • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean it’s a bit more complicated than that. In the past not every company had to be profitable. They were just focusing growth over everything else. But with rising cost due to inflation and rising interest rates they suddenly have to become profitable. And then they proceed to make to worst ever business decisions, to become profitable, but achieve the exact opposite.

    • Tamo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Its simple greed and disdain for their users that they somehow believe if they begin to charge for something that used to be free the use base will simply eat it and be happy.

      • Programmer Belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The problem is they arr charging for a service with attention (ads) and user info currencies that people do not value as much and cannot be easily quantified. This then makes people complacent and lets companies reach for more information, leading to the current enshitification of the internet

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s a pretty severe contradiction of capitalism: When everyone is out to extract as much money as possible, all of it is going to go to whoever the best at doing that, leaving very little for everyone else. This capital isn’t being used to better the human race, it’s sitting in an offshore bank account, funding far right death squads and/or genocides, or being spent on the most vile of child exploitation.