Summary

Elon Musk and his “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) have been granted access to the U.S. Treasury’s federal payment system, raising concerns about security and misuse.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent approved the move after a top Treasury official was ousted for resisting.

Critics warn Musk could freeze payments to government programs or manipulate federal contracts.

The move coincides with DOGE’s takeover of the Office of Personnel Management.

Experts call it a dangerous power grab, as Musk holds no official government position.

  • Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why are we coming up with nonsense scare tactic arguments? He’s obviously just going to divert federal funds to himself via his companies.

    He has no need for a bunch of shitters’ SSN when he would just open himself to the greatest class action in history because it would take about 100 million of us to make him any significant wealth.

  • AAA@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    And it’s only a matter of time until until he boasts about it by posting someone’s SN during an petty online argument.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Elon Musk and his “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE)

    Is that seriously what it’s called? Elon Musk is producing enough cringe to power all of human civilization. I have no idea if this is the worst timeline or not, but it’s certainly the most embarrassing.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    To be fair the social security number is not exactly the most secure thing in the world. More than likely there’s a lot of people who have your social security number and you don’t have any clue that they do.

    That being said, I don’t understand why he’s being allowed this kind of access. Even with the Orange douchebag’s blessing, there should be other people minding the store. Shouldn’t there?

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      there should be other people minding the store. Shouldn’t there?

      There was until they were removed and yes man installed

    • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because the social security number has become the default way to uniquely identify an individual in the US despite the fact that it was never intended for that function.

      • FellowHuman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I get that, I just can’t comprehend, how you can do anything with it. In my country we have similar thing. We have “Birth number” and it is on every contract we sign. But just knowing it does jack shit. (But yeah, we also have identity card, and that changes number every renewal/loss)

        More context:

        For online sign you would need atleast 2 identifications (for example Identity cars and passport). And usualy thay make you come anyway to prove you’re you.

        It is bafeling to me, that some peaple in US have no means of identification.

        • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          For a long time, many companies treated the SSN as a sort of secure password that only the individual would know. Some companies still do. Others, like schools and the military, just treated it like what it is. A unique id number. If you know name, address and SSN, it’s possible to do a lot of different things that can create headaches for the person who was targeted. New credit cards, bank accounts, loans, transferred utilities, rental agreements.

  • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Thanks to Verizon/TMobile/AT&T being the swiss cheese fort Knox, I’d be surprised if Felon Skum didn’t have it.

    Companies have played fast and loose with our PII for so long that it’s at a point where we need something else to act as that value so it’s actually secret. But with this administration, that would end up being a wrist tattoo…

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I already have a suspicion that he might already be leaking information out to third parties from Twitter (private messages, etc.), so…

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    SSN is not a password and anyone who uses it like one doesn’t understand security because you can’t change it. It’s a user ID, like a finger print or email address.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Everyone has my social security number. It’s one of the stupidest security fails of all time that nobody seems to want to fix. And now there is an entire “credit protection” industry so it will remain that way.

  • ansiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    All of my data got breached multiple times going back to the dot-com bubble days, by Yahoo, the original 2015 OPM Beach and by two of the big credit bureaus for a start. If Musk has my social at this point it doesn’t matter.