• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Jesus Christ he has 800,000 users. That’s so depressing.

  • psmgx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wonder how many were bots, like Ashley Madison, that exist to pump numbers and increase engagement

  • affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    ”Money making is a skill,” the website states. “We will teach you how to master it.”

    step 1: convince people to pay you 50$ for access to your deranged ramblings.

    there is no step 2

  • gcheliotis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Omg 800,00 people (presumably mostly young men) signed up for that bullshit? Have we failed so many that they will seek help with the top douchebag himself?

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      According the “hustler’s university 4.0” website you can get in for as little as 49USD (which is a steal, when the posted before price is 147USD)

      Imagine scamming 8x10^5 for just 50USD each, I mean it’s not like a considerable criminal investigation will get started for 50 bucks, but the chinless douche is walking away with 40million, from that scam alone. And I’ll bet that there will be special courses with an additional charge, as well as merch and PPV webinars. Safe to say it’s not just 40million Tate has scammed kids for.

      • umbraroze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s apparently $50 a month, but based on one recent video from a guy who looked into this, there’s apparently a hard sell to “commit” to the program for a year, and if you do commit, it won’t let you cancel or refund, because you committed to the program, bro, that’s a sacred vow, bro, you can’t violate that, bro.

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t even think it’s Andrew Tate specifically and I think that’s a big problem.

      I’m in my early 30s and grew up being ‘the tech generation’, adults marvelled at our simple abilities. Now I see 20 something’s and even teens and they’ve surpassed us in every way, not so much in technical skill but they live in social media.

      Smart watches, tik toks, face time and yada yada. It seems like a borderline gamble what will tickle their fancy or even what the algorithm will just repeatedly shove down their throat until they ‘like it’.

      I guess what I’m saying is I think the reliance and love of technology is what pushed a lot of these young guys into listening to this fucking clown as opposed to straight up ideology.

      • gcheliotis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I am not sure that technology alone is to blame. But I have been thinking for a while now that recommendation algorithms should be open, scrutinized, and regulated even.

    • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s very much a vacuum for what healthy masculinity looks like, and shitheads like Tate are filling that void

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          It makes me sad, especially knowing my son is going to face the same propaganda. I just hope to arm him with the knowledge to see past it.

          • gcheliotis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Knowledge and unconditional love should do the trick 🤞I have found that the men most prone to this are men with a chronic lack of love and self-esteem.

  • stinky@redlemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Our article is boring. How do we get more people to read it?”

    “Put a good looking able bodied bearded white guy on the cover.”

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wut?

      The article is about Andrew Tate. Guess whose face is on the cover? Andrew Tate’s face.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Right, but when I hear “able-bodied,” there’s a pretty strong implication that they’ll actually use that body for something productive. I think your average construction worker is more “able-bodied” than Tate, Tate just looks like a gym queen.

  • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Read the article, it’s so much better than the headline lets on. Trolled him, email addresses, full forum and chat content, etc.

  • cabron_offsets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I take as a positive point that I had no idea who this Andrew taint guy was before the he was arrested or whatever the fuck.