Summary

Australia has introduced a bill to ban social media access for children under 16, enforcing strict penalties of up to AU$50 million for non-compliance.

The law would require biometric or government ID for age verification and prohibits parental consent as an exemption.

While aiming to protect children from harmful content, critics argue it may drive teens to unregulated platforms.

Some services, like YouTube and WhatsApp, will be exempt for educational or messaging purposes.

The bill has bipartisan support but faces scrutiny from independents and child welfare advocates.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This bill is unlikely to pass.

    But not impossible. Australia passes some dumb shit sometimes.

    • Fashim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Remember when Turnbull said that the laws of mathematics are subject to the laws of Australia in regards to encryption?

      Yeah we do some really dumb shit.

      • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        What’s worse is that prior to being a PM, he was chairman of the board at OzEmail prior to them being bought out by iiNet. You would have hoped by working for a technology company he’d have some semblance of a clue about encryption. 🤦🏻‍♂️

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well there was that time Indiana tried to legislate pi to 3, so at least you’re not alone.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        “The laws of mathematics are very commendable, but the only law that applies in Australia is the law of Australia.”

        Brother thinks he can force companies to break unbreakable encryption because the law says so lmfao