Announcement by the creator: https://forum.syncthing.net/t/discontinuing-syncthing-android/23002

Unfortunately I don’t have good news on the state of the android app: I am retiring it. The last release on Github and F-Droid will happen with the December 2024 Syncthing version.

Reason is a combination of Google making Play publishing something between hard and impossible and no active maintenance. The app saw no significant development for a long time and without Play releases I do no longer see enough benefit and/or have enough motivation to keep up the ongoing maintenance an app requires even without doing much, if any, changes.

Thanks a lot to everyone who ever contributed to this app!

  • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not sure I understand the reasoning for discontinuing. Google standing in the way? Not enough f-droid users benefiting from it? It didn’t see development cause it was already feature complete?

  • ma1w4re@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    OH NO, I hope the fork will continue for a bit otherwise I’m so cooked 🥶🥶🥶

  • AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well that’s a shame. I’m sort of half-assedly using syncthing to backup my photos from my phone to my server, but mostly I rely on immich. I never really got the hang of using syncthing with my phone.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s stupid easy to setup, even has a built-in photo backup job.

      I use Syncthing-Fork because it moves all the sync conditions into each job.

      So my photos sync regardless of charging state or network (I’m willing to pay for the data to ensure photos are instantly synced). While other things only sync while on WiFi and charging (e.g. Neobackup).

    • imsodin@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh don’t worry to much, mine too: If there wasn’t an alternative for syncthing on android, I might have kept it on lifesupport :)

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        What’s the history behind this? Why could the changes be done upstream, necessitating a fork?

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sounds like the original maintainer is tired of maintaining it, and the amount of community support wasn’t enough to justify continuing to put in the effort. And then Google’s packaging process pushed it over the edge, hence retiring the project.

          The fork is just another person deciding to take up maintenance of the project.

        • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Syncthing-fork. Both show if you search for Syncthing in fdroid. Since imsodin seems to be OP Dev maintainer for Syncthing, i think he is referring to the fork.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Only one I can think of is Resilio, but it’s hard on RAM and battery for large folders.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It’s been forever since I looked at resilio so this may be an unfair appraisal but… I seem to remember it’s one of those OSS projects that feels a lot more like free tier commercial software. Do you think that’s the case or nah?

            Honestly just a dumb rsync client would be enough for me.

          • bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            And I don‘t know what‘s going on with them. There weren’t any updates for years, now there is a design overhaul, no new features and suddenly they want me to register. Duck

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Just got into using Syncthing for my home network, was thinking I should add it to my phone. Makes sense it dies the instant I consider it

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The way i understand it, this stops maintenance for Syncthing, but Syncthing-fork in fdroid will continue its development and support as usual. Both show if you do a Syncthing search in fdroid. The fork is more up to date with features.

    • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Consider yourself lucky, I feel the pain of seeing the end of years of a loving relationship.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lol, I was also looking at installing it last weekend.

      I guess this thing is on the same connection as my stock choices.

        • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t get it.

          How is that a problem to people wanting to work on or work with Bitwarden? Or am I misunderstanding the wording on it?

          It just seems to say that you cannot rip this SDK out to use it on something else. Which makes sense as far as an internal library goes, at least on the surface?

          • 486@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Perhaps the hard dependency was a mistake, but not them moving more and more code to their proprietary library. It appears that their intent is to make the client mostly a wrapper around their proprietary library, so they can still claim to have an open source GPLv3 piece of software. What good is that client if you can only use it in conjunction with that proprietary library, even if you can build it without that dependency?

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              mostly a wrapper around their proprietary library

              I’m not familiar with exactly what Bitwarden are doing, but Nvidia are doing something similar to what you described with their Linux GPU drivers. They launched new open-source drivers (not nouveau) for Turing (GTX 16 and RTX 20 series) and newer GPUs. What they’re actually doing is moving more and more functionality out of the drivers into the closed-source firmware, reducing the amount of code they need to open source. Maybe that’s okay? I’m not sure how I feel about it.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  To be fair, the project page says this:

                  The password manager SDK is not intended for public use and is not supported by Bitwarden at this stage. It is solely intended to centralize the business logic and to provide a single source of truth for the internal applications. As the SDK evolves into a more stable and feature complete state we will re-evaluate the possibility of publishing stable bindings for the public. The password manager interface is unstable and will change without warning.

                  So there are two ways this can go:

                  • they complete the refactor and release it as FOSS
                  • they complete the refactor and change the clients to be proprietary

                  I’m going to stick with them until I see what they do once they complete the refactor.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hoping it remains viable for a long time without updates. Syncing my KeePass database is really key for me. I need to fluidly add and read passwords from at least 3 devices.

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      As noted elsewhere Syncthing-Fork is still going strong, and a drop-in replacement, it’s on F-Droid.

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do you know if I need to reconfigure my folders?

        I guess if the transition is not smooth there is still time for them to adapt something until the very end…

        On another hand, it seems like we all deposited all our eggs in one basket huh?

        I really can’t think of many Synching replacements… Even when I know there are a few.

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not sure, but it is still active with like 80 contributors. It’s much the same as the original with a couple of extra features and more languages, so transition should be minimally painful, maybe even export - import level. I’ve been using it for years as I saw the original wasn’t very active, but they’re pretty much (essential) feature complete and stable, which is good. Apparently, google thinks that’s bad.

  • xodoh74984@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is sad. Google Play should never hold this weight the self hosted community. For Android users dedicated to open source software, F-Droid is the target.

    I don’t think SyncThing users would have much issue with the app disappearing from Google. Doing away with Google is the goal.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      As much as I want to use F-Droid, my work blocks all third party app stores so it’s either have access to my work stuff on one phone (via profiles) or dual wield two phones.

      I lack the patience to dual wield again. It’s very annoying.

      • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m annoyed to see you getting down voted - I had a similar issue years ago with my work MacBook (couldn’t run a custom WM because any modification to the Finder was blocked without putting the machine into “unsafe” mode).

        I love OSS, but without a verifiable way to distribute it large swaths of the workforce won’t be able to use it.

        F-Droid is great, but sadly it isn’t enough.

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I was today years old when I learned that you can run a custom WM on a Mac.

          That’s like…the equivalent of a coca cola soda machine dispensing Pepsi.

          And in terms of down votes, I don’t really care too much. It evens out overtime.

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Is this your personal phone? If your work were to dictate what you are allowed to install on your personal phone, that’d be a serious overstepping of bounds.

        Perhaps you can sneak in f-droid via adb install and give it app installation permissions via ADB though.

        • Bilb!@lem.monster
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          If “your” phone belongs to your employer that’s the choice you made. It isn’t yours.

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          My primary phone belongs to my work. I get a stipend every two years that essentially allows me to buy any supported phone I want.

          The conditions are that it’s managed by them via MDM and all my work stuff is on the work profile side.

          It is a choice I make since it allows me to not carry two phones. I did that for the first two years at my company and it was annoying.

          • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            My primary phone belongs to my work.

            So it’s not yours. Looks from here that’s the one issue you have to solve before everything else.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The problem is not “Syncthing users” it is the others that we bring along with us.

      I already have F-Droid on my phone, but the dozen others that I have promoted Syncthing to over the years do not. This is going to cause a bunch of problems.

      This is much more important than what you portray here.

      • t_378@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The point you raise reminds me of when Signal dropped SMS support, after my efforts to convert all the non techie people in my life over to it. So sad when it happens…

      • tychosmoose@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That and the shrinking ability to grant access to device storage. If that becomes an option only on rooted phones (which seems like the directly Google is heading) it will make the audience for such an app much smaller.

            • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              This is my currently dilemma.
              Each year Android becomes more restrictive like iOS with none of the benefits, Rooting becomes harder as more apps tap into the Play Integrity API (and strong Integrity is on the way to kill most workarounds for it), iPhone got a little better but is still locked down as fuck, where the hell do I go to? 😒

            • can@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Realistically I have no where to go and that’s the problem. iOS is even more locked down.

              • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                No one says you have to upgrade your phone OS to the latest Android. You can just keep using the Android (and/or Custom ROM) that works.

                • can@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Sure, but what about security? Not that I haven’t had to use outdated phones before.

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s a very stable, reliable, local, cross-platform file syncing that is pretty easy to set up. Basically, it allows you to have a shared folder (or folders) on multiple devices without using Google Drive, OneDrive, iCloud, etc.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s a very convenient app to sync files between your devices. It’s cro-platform and doesn’t require any registrations.

      Many people (me included) use it to sync their password databases.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Phones are becoming less and less interesting by the day.

    Once they get to the point were all of the options that don’t require incredibly inconvenient sacrifices in functionality to maintain the interesting stuff like a video game console then that will kill interest in the market for me.

    If I can’t do anything besides basic smart phone crap I might as well just buy whatever has a good camera once every half decade or so and be done with it. So whatever top end thing Samsung or Apple are putting out.

    I’m not sure Google has fully thought through what it means to just be a worse version of what Apple puts out, but with more ads.

      • Koarnine@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think goes from obsession to possesion maybe, ur kinda tied to a phone for a lot of services these days and 5 years is at least more reasonable than every year or 2

        • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’re right, and if we think about it, companies are well aware of that, and that’s why they don’t care for offering anything beyond the basic and walled experience, because we will buy anyway.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yea, I want a small linux PC with touch screen, and mobile Internet 🙃 sadly, there seem none to be around with enough battery and enough computing power and a good USB C with working PD and OTG (ideally a alt mode video protocol like hdmi/DP/thunderbolt as well)

      One may dream 😂😅

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Smartphone design is mostly a solved problem. Take today’s screens and processors and throw in a few features from the past (removable storage, IR blaster, and headphone jack) and you have a 10-year phone.

      I used to get a new phone every year because phone got way better each generation.

      My phone is top-tier from 2021 (Z Fold 3), and I have had zero temptation from the newer versions. All they really have is faster processing, but since all apps are designed to run well on budget phones from 5 years ago, there’s no reason to upgrade.

      • since all apps are designed to run well on budget phones from 5 years ago, there’s no reason to upgrade.

        5 years, maybe, but any more is stretching it. And not getting system upgrades anymore is problematic. Unless you own a particular model of phone, de-Googled Android can be hard to come by.

        For example, I have a 7-year old Pixel C. By the time Google stopped using system updates for it, I wasn’t wanting them as every release made the device slower and more unstable. After some effort, I was finally able to install a version of Lineage, which itself has problems including no updates in years. There’s a lot of software that is incompatible with my device, both from Aurora and FDroid.

        Android isn’t Linux; Google doesn’t care about maintaining backward compatability on old devices, much less performance, and there’s no army of engineers making sure it is because there’s a served running in walled-up closet no one can find.

        Google deprecates features and ABIs in Android, apps update and suddenly aren’t backwards compatible.

        5 years, maybe. The entire industry is addicted to users upgrading their phones, and everyone gets a piece of that pie. There’s no actors, except perhaps app developers, who have any interest in keeping old phones running. Telecoms upgrade their wireless network - the internet connection in my 8 y/o car, and half its navigation features, died the day AT&T decided to stop supporting 3G; Phone makers make no money if you don’t buy new phones; and maintaining backwards compatibility costs Google money which they’d rather siphon off to shareholders.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Phone makers make no money if you don’t buy new phones

          Maybe they should make a new phone thats desirable then. I’m still running on a phone from 2016 because there’s no modern one that wouldn’t lose me functionality that I use all the time. Anything I buy would be a downgrade.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          My Galaxy Note 8 is a backup phone. It was a flagship when it launched, yeah. But even so, it’s 7 years old, the last update for it was over 2.5 years ago, and it’s still chugging along like a champion.

  • justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh boy, just wanted to get into it. Damn sad, not of course understandable, the developers are only humans as well

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The way i understand it, this stops maintenance for Syncthing, but Syncthing-fork in fdroid will continue its development and support as usual. Both show if you do a Syncthing search in fdroid. The fork is more up to date with features.

  • el_abuelo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just installed syncthing-fork from f-droid and it worked flawlessly as far as I can tell:

    1. “Export” in syncthing
    2. Uninstall syncthing
    3. Install syncthing-fork from f-droid
    4. Import in syncthing-fork
    • Unbecredible@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I feel the existence of an “export” option in a piece of software is noble in this day and age, and I’m so appreciative of it.

      It says “look, I don’t WANT you to go to my competitor, but I’m not gonna try to hold your data hostage to prevent it.”

      It’s class, as the Scottish would say.

      • Dasnap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve said for a while that platforms that allow you to easily move make me more comfortable using them, and ironically, more likely to stay around.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Open source software doesn’t have a reason to lock you in like proprietary software does :)

        More and more proprietary SaaS systems are allowing data exports now, to comply with laws like the GDPR “right to know”. Say what you want about Google and Facebook, but they were the first big companies to start allowing data to be exported before there was any law requiring it - Facebook in 2010 and Google in 2011.

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Did it transfer over your folder setups so you don’t need to set it up manually?

  • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve been using Syncthing-Fork (on F-Droid) for the extra features it has. I wonder if that developer will be able to continue.

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I can only hope the company makes the iOS client (Möbius) decides they need syncthing to continue and decide to get behind it.

    As I recall, they use Syncthing as a solution in their business, this would be a big-break for them.

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It says “unlimited file sync is a $5 in-app unlock” so I’m guessing they can make money. Main problem is the apple developer fees that will eat the profit of the first 25 sales each year

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Maybe I’m misremembering, but I thought they used Syncthing as part of a business not directly related to Möbius - as a vendor supplying data management solutions to other companies. I suspect Möbius came out of need for their clients.

        I can picture the vendor website in my head, just wish I could remember who it was for sure.

        I would eagerly pay for syncthing, it’s that important to me. I keep hundreds of gigs moving around using it. It’s on my annual donate list already, but clearly that’s insufficient.

        Maybe the Syncthing-Fork dev will keep it going.

        iOS is already more restricted on app sandboxes, and Möbius can handle it in the paid version.

        On Android, Resilio somehow has more file access than Syncthing, even without root (it can read/write to either SD card root, while Syncthing can only write to a subfolder of SD0, and can’t write anywhere of an external SD). So there’s something going on.