Milton rapidly intensified to a Category 5 hurricane late Monday morning.

Within hours, Milton strengthened to a Category 2, then a Category 3, then a Category 4 and finally a Category 5.

Milton now ranks as the third-greatest 24-hour wind speed intensification for a hurricane in the Atlantic Basin. (Records are based on data since the satellite era began in the 1960s.)

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Why? If people die because they don’t fund fema and Florida governor don’t take calls from Harris, then they blame it in Biden’s America. The immigrants took all the funding for hurricanes, remember?

      Ugh, I hate so many things right now.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        To be honest this Guarantees Florida goes Red this round when it was getting close to turning back to purple. Tampa and Orlando both vote Blue, and many people will get displaced. Mail will be lost, voting locations will be destroyed, and you can’t just show up to any polling place to vote. “Oh you moved across the state because your house is flooded, well you can vote 350 miles from where you are now, or you can vote by mail, we sent it to your mailbox that doesn’t exist anymore”

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            Yarp, remember Florida took to long in 2000 to get the votes counted when Florida’s supreme Court was turned down by the U.S. supreme Court to allow time to do one final recount as things were off.

            They awarded all 25 Florida electorial votes to George Bush, and Gore stepped down to allow it to be a civil process.

            If it takes to long to count Desantis only needs one round of Votes to show they were ahead, and stall on placing electors using his election police he created at his side to help the U.S. supreme Court double down on their original ruling 24 years ago

            https://www.britannica.com/event/Bush-v-Gore

            The count showed Gore won the Vote, would have won the election. Without it, we may have never invaded Iraq.

            https://www.cbsnews.com/news/gore-comes-out-swinging-on-iraq/

            Since then, Florida has outgrown New York, going from 25 electoral votes to 30. The effects of Florida going 1 way or another is huge

      • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Bullshit. Go read the FEMA website about the their funding, especially how the disaster relief and immigrant funding is completely separated. Furthermore, the $750.00 is a Serious Needs Assistance that helps people to buy food, baby formula and the basics.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Even though Tanya Marunchak’s Belleair Beach home was flooded with more than 4 feet (1.2 meters) of water from Helene, she and her husband were unsure Monday morning if they should evacuate. She wanted to leave, but her husband thought their three-story home was sturdy enough to withstand Milton.

    That poor woman. If her husband thinks he’s safe in their “sturdy” home, she should leave him behind.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    So is trump at Mar a Lego right now standing proudly on the front lawn for this? Is he staying there, “standing his ground” against the “climate hoax”?

    Or is he hiding somewhere else safe, with an excuse, like a coward who’s actually afraid of climate change?

  • Gerudo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Good thing DeSantis won’t pick up the phone from Biden or Harris to start funding relief.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Insurance companies don’t build shit. They just collect money from people, and sometimes give some of it back.

        • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          unless they can find a way to screw you over for profit, then they absolutely will no matter how ridiculous the “reasoning”*

          • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            I believe it was Katrina where the insurance said it was wind damage when you only had flood insurance, but if you’re neighbor only had wind coverage they’d tell them it was water damage.

            • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              Right storm. Wrong details.

              They (insurance companies) were claiming it as flood/surge damage, even if wind ripped off your roof to let the water inside. Wind was covered, water wasn’t. Companies were sued for trying to blanket deny an area based on one generic engineering report, or denying coverage if flood waters came through after wind destroyed a place. Insurance com0anies don’t typically offer flood insurance to a lot of places and if homeowners want it, they have to buy it through the federal government.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        They’re actually required to give 85% of everything back, so they give back most of it. It seems like Florida is becoming too much of a hassle to insure, though. Some companies have pulled out of florida.

    • Lumilias@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      What insurance companies? They all backed out of Florida years ago. Now it’s state funded home insurance footing the bill.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        I read a thing recently that insurance companies are getting increasingly skittish all over the country, even places that wouldn’t traditionally be considered risky, because yay, climate change.

        The interesting thing about it was that insurance companies’ insurance is increasingly the thing that’s causing issues, because it’s getting harder for the risk to be spread out. That is to say that insurance companies financially rely on areas with low rates of natural disasters because they end up being a net positive due to insurance premiums and no need for payout. Fewer of these “safe” areas mean the insurance companies struggle to stay solvent and have to rely on their own insurance policies to have their back, but those meta-insurance companies have apparently been historically loud about climate change — probably because besides the government, they’re the ones who have to pony up

        • CainTheLongshot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Here in Missouri, home owners insurance is starting to lose hail damage from coverage. Damn near 90% of the houses around my area have now replaced their roofs, and have the roofing signage out front. It’s almost a running joke now: guessing which house will be next to get one, and counting the company’s signs to see who’s making a killing.

    • Null User Object@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      If people don’t have the common sense to not build houses in places that are guaranteed to be destroyed by a natural disaster sooner than later, then I shouldn’t have to subsidize their rebuilding costs through my insurance premiums.

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Yeah, used to be that insurance costs were almost directly skewed based on risk. But then people were upset that it costed so much to insure some places(the ones that should be prohibitively expensive to insure). And then slowly over time they baked in little increases in price everywhere else to subsidise huge price cuts in those areas to out-compete the companies that put the onus entirely on the people taking risks. Eventually, as it became more and more widespread to do that, it became financially more viable to spread it out rather than have drastically more expensive areas. And now we all have to partially cover people who are taking way more risk than we would.

      • ApatheticCactus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        That or build something that can stand up to being hit. Tall order, but the inner armchair engineer in me thinks it’s like, totally possible.

        • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          I think you forget, building it stronger once would cost 50% more upfront. Better to build it twice, or three times at only 100% cost each time. That way you can be the lowest bidder every time.

        • Null User Object@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          That seems like a perfectly reasonable place to build that’s not obviously at threat from hurricanes. But sometimes shit happens that couldn’t be easily foreseen, and THAT’S what insurance is for.

          My point, however, is that insurance is NOT to make other policy holders foot the expense of someone repeatedly repairing/rebuilding after completely foreseeable/inevitable events.

          To anyone that insists on having a house right on the beach on the Gulf Coast, I say, “Insure thy self.”

    • Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      If your policy covers wind they claim the damage is from water. If your policy covers water, they claim the damage is from wind. If your policy covers both, they claim a hurricane is exempt as an act of god.