• thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    30GB plus unlimited data streaming while using it…

    That said, I suppose one plus is that this hopefully wont need as many 10+GiB updates literally right when I finally have an hour free and want to play it.

    • sneaky@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m thinking 30 before opening the game and then 100+ after.

    • sneaky@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      30GB to install then 100+ after you open the game and it downloads updates and scenery. Same deal as 2020.

  • _bcron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Most games, most textures are compressed, which leads to something like Diablo 2’s remake having ridiculous load times considering it’s a simple reskin of a 20 year old game. That 30GB footprint probably gets unpacked to something twice the size, and if you’re caching literally every single thing for the sake of smoothness (flight sims rarely have loading screens when you enter another country’s airspace or a different biome), and a little bit of overhead for OS etc, gonna need heaps of RAM

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Interesting—D2R only had 1-3 seconds’ load time for me! Was it bad on consoles without SSDs?

      • _bcron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nowadays 2 seconds is an eternity considering M.2 drive speed and DDR4 bandwidth. Baldur’s Gate 1 for example, nothing is compressed and load times are in single digit milliseconds. Sure BG1 is loading like 1/8th the stuff but load times are 1/300th

        There’s actually a program people use for D2R to unpack textures and it cuts load time significantly, but the install and the uncompressed files have a massive footprint

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wonder if it’s going to take several hours to download all the world content before allowing into you into the menu screen like MSFS2020 does.

    I wonder if they’ll insist on using MS servers for the content and will be kept at MS server caps at 5MBPS, meaning that it will take 20+ hours of downloading before you can even play, pulling you outside of the 2 hour Steam return window.

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah fucking MSFS2020 was such a bust for me living in Australia. It took days to download then I finally got it working something went wrong with install files and had to dick around. In the end I played 3 hours of it but have hundreds in download time.

      Fuck MSFS

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I was seriously hyped for it and waited years until I had a good gaming rig and then when I downloaded it I couldn’t even get past the loading screen. Unable to establish connection to Microsoft servers. I ended up buying Xplane 12 and Aerofly FS4 instead.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Afaik Steam does refund games if you tell support that you spent time troubleshooting or waited for the launcher to download the actual files.
      Though I only think to have read about it. No concrete proof.

      • fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah the Steam refund 2 hour thing is just the no questions asked guaranteed refund window. You can absolutely request a refund outside of that window and they’ll be quite reasonable in most cases.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hell, they’ve been refunding Linux users for GTAV this week because of the change to BattleEye.

      • UmeU@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Years ago, I tried cities skylines on a sort of shitty PC… spent at least 8 hours trying to get it to work, then just gave up.

        Requested a refund and it was granted almost immediately.

        I bought a better PC and repurchased, and not it runs fine but the game itself is pretty mod dependent and I have spent more time installing and uninstalling mods than actually playing the game.

        So yes, ask for a refund and you will probably get it even outside the 2hour window.

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just to provide some context as someone who played the hell out of 2020 (on gamepass) and is looking forward to buying 2024 minute 1 and then figuring out how to keep a cat from fucking up a HOTAS sled for minutes 2-900:

    The install is small because that is just the core game. Theoretically, that is all you need and it contains the meshes/logic for meshes and plane textures and so forth. You will then stream map data as you play and cache that. So the first time you take off at Pyongyang International it will take a bit of time to load but subsequent trips will be super fast.

    That said… you will almost assuredly download the world packs. This is the much more hand crafted cities and airports so you can genuinely feel like you are flying over Paris or escaping from London Heathrow’s international terminal and so forth. Or just to fix some weirdness because of a building layout near a river. And those world packs get big.

    Before I switched over to linux for full time gaming? My PC install of MSFS 2020 was probably 100-200 GB on its own just from all the updates?

    • A7thStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I remember being asked what I needed 64 MB of RAM for. My answer, of course, being “because I can.”

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        My server has around 156GB RAM.

        Do I use most of it? Nah.

        Why then?

        Cuz it was free from work and I wanted to hit the amount from Weird Al’s “it’s all about the Pentiums”

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        after years of dealing with emm386 trying to get ultima 7 to run on DOS, i always bought all the ram i could afford. fuck all that “you don’t need that much” bullshit

  • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is there any reason to choose MSFS over Flightgear other than simply being unaware of the latter’s existence?

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t know that other one, but what hooked people on MSFS was the AI terrain made from satellite images letting you fly from anywhere to anywhere, and some capitals are handmade.

      They also added missions based on the previous games to celebrate the series history.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, yes, as I’m sure you know already. Flightgear is a fine product and lots of respect to the contributors, but the support around MSFS, the level of detail and whole host of other factors make MSFS the one to beat; even if the flight model of XPlane is probably a tad better.

  • auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s not really odd. It likely caches decompressed assets and such.

    • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’ve also talked about massively leveraging cloud computing and streaming, it’s likely a lot of actual scenery isn’t part of the offline file size unless you cache the areas for offline play (if that’s even an option)

      • auzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah. That was admittedly the big issue with Australia. With VFR it was useless unless we used Orbx in the days

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m glad they’re moving the world update and other massive downloads to something in the cloud and on-demand. Anything between 10-40% of my “play time” on steam was actually downloading stuff.

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oddly? The game needs ram to store data like variables that the game generates, like physics simulations, among other game systems. The game’s asset size alone doesn’t really matter.

    • geogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know. That statement was weird. In just a few lines of code I can chew up all available ram on a machine.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah, most of the space is filled with textures in a graphical game. Which is odd in 2:1 RAM:disk ratio, since most of the textures are in ddx nowadays, a format the GPU can use 1:1. You can’t really compress ddx.