(i’m also gonna ambush my friends about Signal on sunday and coerce them to download it to get rid of the green bubbles)

  • VARXBLE@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Look guys, you don’t need to justify your piracy. There is nothing ethically wrong with pirating media.

    Anticonsumer practices are justification enough. If someone has a childish response of “uR sTeaLiNg!!”, give them an equally childish retort and tell them to eat your farts.

    • bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You pirate to preserve media.

      I pirate because I like pissing off billion dollar conglomerates.

      We are not the same.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I pirate cause I can 🤷‍♂️ I spend a lot of money on media and gaming, sometimes I’m not $60 interested though lol.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I am with this guy… Piracy generates some of the best corpo cope content

        Priceless seeing them getting twisted INA not about it with all of their lawyers and can’t do shot about some poor sucker just watching it without laying daddy the tax hehe

    • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d argue that indeed we do as a community need to justify our actions. Mainstream knowledge and media label us as close to thieves and criminals. People need to realize we just want to share bits and bytes across the internet, and we are stewards of media preservation and freedom of information. As cracking down piracy become normalized, it’s even more important to have a voice in society, and reassure people that what we’re doing is morally grounded

  • lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    While I am also not a huge fan of their DLCs it does actually make sense.

    The base game is still a good game many many years after release and it’s even better now than it was at release due to the free updates that come with the paid DLCs. There is also little reason to buy every single DLC at once or at all. You buy the ones with features you like. And there are obviously sales too. Don’t buy at full price! Everybody knows that.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Idk abour other people but i pirate everything first and if its good i buy it. I pirated a bunch of games back in the day and bought the good ones. Terraria, geometry dash, minecraft, etc(can you tell i played on mobile lol)

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “The complete experience…”

    Dude most of those DLCs for Stellaris are just new parts for customizing the look of your civ. Only 2 actually are like expansions for the game that add more than just aesthetic content.

    Not saying you should have bought it over pirating, but like… You could have saved bandwidth by also not getting most of those DLCs at all.

  • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    i’m also gonna ambush my friends about Signal on sunday

    A bit late if you already told a commercial company about your piracy, as well

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Historical piracy was never about social justice, especially when you consider that a number of pirates during the 1600-1800s received government’s blessings to operate, so long as they didn’t attack the nation’s ships.

    Pirates simply did on sea the same thing highway robbers have been doing on land since the dawn of civilization.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly.

      Piracy was “tolerated”, because it stole money from competitors.

      Even if a pirate lied and only turned over some of the booty to the crown, it still took it from their enemies.

  • Fontasia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Your reminder that Nintendo 64 games on the Nintendo Switch are using an open source emulator that Nintendo has not contributed to or endorsed in anyway, and is believed to be using game ROMs collected by preservationists.

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t remember which game, but there was one that it came out that they straight up lost the files for and had to download from a ROM site to put on the virtual console thing

  • moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    you can pirate games but don’t jerk yourself off about it, you don’t have to justify downloading video games as media preservation to not be a bad person because of it

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I still don’t know how I2P would be able to mask where the packets go to or come from, even if they encrypt the contents

        • 31337@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Onion-like routing. It takes multiple hops to get to a destination. Each hop can only decrypt the next destination to send the packet to (i.e. peeling off a layer of the onion).

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Would that keep lawyers from just taking the last ip they get for their frivolous law suits? That way I could get a letter for something I actually didn’t download

            • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s next to impossible to do this. I think if you read up on the topic you’ll have a better understanding; I’d like to explain more but it’s difficult to do so without knowing your level of expertise, etc.

              The TL;DR is that nodes on i2p have no clue which nodes line up with which IP addresses. It’s true that from outside the overly you can see it’s i2p traffic, but you’d need to defeat so many layers of encryption that it’s close to impossible.

              • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                You will still always know where the packet last came from, otherwise it could not be routed to you. As I live in germany I have to deal with the threat of lawyers sending letters when they ‘caught you’ torrenting. So if anyone uses this in germany without a vpn and happens to be the last one in the chain they will use it just like they use their current system to claim you pirated stuff because you were uploading stuff through torrents.

                • Iapar@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  If they can’t follow the chain how do they know that you got something illegal? As I understand it the ISP would just see that you got an encrypted Paket from some random IP. Am I mistaking?

            • 31337@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I mean, you can be sued for anything, but it will get thrown out. Like, I guess the MPAA could offer a movie for download, then try to sue the first hop they upload a chunk to, but that really doesn’t make any sense (because they offered it for download in the first place). Furthermore, the first hop(s) aren’t the people that are using the file, and they can’t even read it. If people could successfully sue nodes, then ISPs and postal services could be sued for anything that passes through their networks.

            • Laser@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              By how the protocol is structured, it’s impossible for the address a downloader sees to know what the packet they forward actually contains, so they’re just taking the role of an ISP. Also, they don’t know the original source IP.

            • 31337@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, torrents usually run 100-300KiB/s. I guess not too bad for smaller files. About an hour or three per GB.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Damn I’d talk about it on national tv here in Australia. It’s just piracy, nbd.

      • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well at least you’re using i2p, I kind of wish more people would. I just don’t like generally using unencrypted communication methods, so discussing even a simple crime like piracy is no bueno for me.

  • yu_cosmic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Bro SMS?! thats like making it easy to the phone company which by law have to send logs to the g-mans, which by extension help copyright infliction and re distribution of… Yeah, well, maybe tho, change to other chat service?

    • aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      (i’m also gonna ambush my friends about Signal on sunday and coerce them to download it to get rid of the green bubbles

      yessir imma ambush my friends about signal soon

    • TwinTusks@bitforged.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I love paradox games, but the amount of dlc is killing me. I love how they continue to support their games, yes, but damn.

      • Catpurrple@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        And then when they do update the game, and add 20 more dollars of new dlc at the same time, if you’re someone who likes mods, well congratulations. Your installation is ruined and you can’t go back to your saved game(s) without there being some level of headache involved. At this point a high seas version of stellaris would probably be a relief, since there’s no auto updates and all dlcs. But here I am, a sucker who bought like three-quarters of the dlc over the years and can’t even play it because I’ll just be sad my last playthrough got ended prematurely with a dlc release… Fuck Paradox and all their games.

        • Syntha@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          What are you on about? You can just turn off auto updates or revert back to previous versions.