Ok, so co-opting the “weird” thing? This is stupid.
I mean, me too buddy, but I found a strong wholesome woman to be my girlfriend for that reason and don’t fetishize happily married politicians as an outlet
It’s crazy how Trump can’t stop talking about how attractive he finds Kamala. He has compared her to his imported model wife, and to Sophia Loren and Elizabeth Taylor, and then recently he decided enough is enough and went on a rant about how he himself is hotter than Kamala.
I don’t remember a single Dem politician or pundit going there at all. Everyone was busy scrutinizing her record, her success chances, and her policy platform for the next 4 years. But then again, I don’t remember Dems going far out of their way to call every female politician dumb and unhinged, as is customary in Republican campaigning. This weird cult of sexualizing every woman while calling her stupid, no matter the scenario. She could be an accomplished lawyer with an economics undergrad, wearing a pantsuit covered from neck to toes, and they’ll still go there.
Legitimately, is this fetishizing? I saw it as a reference to presidents tending to dramatically age while in office due to stress.
In relation to how trump/repub’s talk about it: I interpret it as such, talking about “pants having a hard time” for a married 59yo woman who happens to have some power and is attractive at the same time definitely sounds misogynistic and reductive at best, and fetishizing/predatory in reality.
In the context of the meme I know they meant it complimentary, so its… less bad and more “wholesome” but still a bit ick.
Turns out I misread this entirely so now I see what you meant. I read it as “I am a wholesome…” You right.
All good.
Wholesome? She used sex to progress her career. She was 30 when she was banging 60yo Willie Harris to progress her career. She was also one of Montrel Williams multiple girlfriends when they were together. Super wholesome.
Lolol. I think this might be the troll of the post
It is a known fact that briefly dating Montrel Williams several decades ago, when you are both available singles, provides a direct path to becoming the Leader of the Free World. I tried it myself but couldn’t get Montrel to set a date for a movie night no matter how desperate my DMs. Ah, to think I could have been a contender.
Yet I, for one, am glad that Mr. Trump’s dating history is unimpeachable, because I don’t think I could handle 2 risqué backgrounds in a single presidential season.
Hour old account, has 88 in the username. Not at all subtle.
