TL;DR

  • Efforts like Graphene OS face increasing pressure from apps that refuse to run on non-standard Android.
  • The custom ROM project characterizes Google’s approach to device attestation as incomplete and flawed.
  • Graphene OS is prepared to take legal action if Google won’t let it pass Play Integrity checks.
  • jetsetdorito@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    the only reason I’ve wanted to be rooted in recent years is when I didn’t have hotspot on my plan and the most complete way around that was with root.

    I think I would like a degoogled Lineage/Graphene OS though

    • Kevnyon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Why is stuff like that included not included in every plan by default? As a European, I can’t even imagine paying extra for that. If I want to hotspot my data, my operator can kiss my ass and simply allow it, I’m paying for the data anyway.

      • jetsetdorito@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        for this case it was a plan that’s pretty discounted and also unlimited without hard throttle. they don’t want people using it on computers or game consoles probably

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          As Kevnyon@lemmy.world said: @NetworkOperator: Kiss my ass. I pay your for service. You wanna restrict me, I switch my damn plan. If I use it on my phone streaming 4K stuff from my home server or watch 1GB of data over hot spot on my phone is not their business.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hell yes.

    It’s fucking open source, this is no different from games with intrusive anti-cheat refusing to run on Linux, except it this case it’s not even a different OS.

    It’s monopolistic and anti-user.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ironically, if Graphene would succeed, it would lead to a system that’s every bit as locked down as a manufacturer’s Android. GrapheneOS would also not allow you to have root etc.

      IMO Graphene wants a place at the big player table. They’re not in it for user freedoms.

      • saiarcot895@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        A manufacturer’s Android can have special privileges for their own apps, and almost will certainly have special privileges for Google’s apps.

        Graphene by default wouldn’t give special privileges to any app, so that’s at least a plus.

        It’s true that it would be locked down, but you at least have a couple more controls over how locked down compared to a manufacturer’s OS.

  • towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    The only reason I stopped using grapheneOS was because Google contactless payment didn’t work.
    Loved everything else about graphene tho

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve never used contactless on my phone, I already had a contactless debit card. Why are you, and others, using their phones to pay?

      • aquinteros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        the app hides the real numbers for the credit card and gives the POS a mock id to make the purchase. it’s harder to clone. also you need to unlock the phone for it to work it’s an extra layer of protection

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Why carry a contact less card when you can pay with your phone? Have you given it a try? I find myself without a card in lots of situations. Paying by phone is incredibly convenient. Lot harder to lose than a card too.

        • Tomato666@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes, it has an upper limit though as I discovered after cycling to the garage to pick up my car with just my phone. Triple cycling joy that day 🙄

          • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes this depends on the linked card, the software you are using and sometimes vendor limits. Many banks have a cardless withdrawal from atm option as a backup if there happens to be atm nearby. These can have pretty high limits. There are also card generating apps like cash app where you create a cc number on the fly. In a pinch most vendors can easily split the cost of something across different cards if one is maxing out.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’d still carry my debit card if I used phone in case I lose either as I would have the other. I think I’d be more likely to notice my phone is missing but more likely to lose the phone in the first place.

          I’ve never tried it in part because I don’t trust my phone with it’s proprietary software, and I suspect there may be no open source apps to pay with.

        • communism@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          A contactless card barely takes up any space. It’s not particularly easier to lose either. I’ve never lost my card; I just keep it in my wallet, in my pocket, just like my phone is in my pocket.

          • neinhorn@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Easy with one card, but it’s a different story when you have multiple cards. Transit pass, loyalty cards from grocery stores for discounts, credit cards for cash back rewards.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            You know what takes up less space? Software on the phone that I’m already carrying.

            There have also been occasions where I forget my wallet but still have my phone to pay with.

      • Demdaru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lazy.

        Just plain lazy.

        I already have my phone in hand in shops - shopping lists, reminders or even plain taking my mind off the shelves so I won’t buy unnecessary shit. Then I get to checkout and…my phone is already in hand. Just boop it and done. No need to dig out wallet from pocket and then dig out card from wallet.

      • nevemsenki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I can create a virtual card before every trip, use it via my phone and then cancel it after the trip, never worrying if my card got skimmed anywhere for one.

        • aquinteros@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          when you pay using the virtual wallet it automatically makes a mock id to the POS … at least in my country it does

        • steel_nomad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          For some fucking reason there is zero option for this type of secure virtual card in my country. And I hate it. A friend got skimmed for over $1200 a couple months ago.

      • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s no need to carry your cards if you already have your phone.

        Also, unlike your wallet, if you lose it you can track it.

      • bellafragmento@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve never used a contactless debit card. I already had a chip and pin debit card. Why are you, and others, using your contactless card to pay?

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          My Chip+PIN card has an RFID chip. Standard in Germany. Why would I tell, much less trust, google with my banking. Why would I let them skim data and/or a percentage off the transaction. Why would I choose a system with spotty acceptance, whereas I can use my girocard everywhere. It also doubles as 2nd factor for online banking.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I didn’t choose, my bank gave me a contactless card when my last chip and pin card expired (the card still has chip and pin which I use when contactless fails).

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I find it super convenient.
        Also, it doesn’t have a limit. Pretty sure I bought my last car with contactless on my phone, but that was years ago.

    • JCreazy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m sure Google contactless payment works really well when the phone is dead. Or you drop your phone in a toilet or off a bridge. It’s far easier to loose a phone than a card in a wallet in your pocket. If you lose your phone, you also lose access to all your money.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I also carry a wallet? Cause, yknow, ID and stuff.

        Phone is just way more convenient. Especially since I don’t have a limit on its contactless amount. Whereas with my card, I would have to chip&pin for anything over £40

      • Markus Sugarhill@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not a fan of google pay, but I gotta say, I lost way more wallets than phones in my life it’s about a 3 to 0 ratio (not counting purses I have lost before owning a phone.

  • Lupec@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wow, I legit just ordered a used pixel yesterday to give graphene a try lol. Uncanny timing!

    Anyhow, that’s great news! I can really see the EU sinking its teeth into this if nothing else.

    • newproph@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’ve been using graphene for years at this point and it’s the best operating system I’ve ever had on a phone. Before this my favorite phone was a jail broken iPhone 5c. I even got a pixel tablet to take notes on for college recently and put graphene on it as well.

      Only thing Google has right atm is leaving the bootloader on their phones unlockable.

      • Lupec@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thanks for the tips, I’m a happy Aegis user already! Thankfully, my main bank explicitly doesn’t care about custom roms and I’m thinking I’ll just cut ties with the ones who do and let them know that was the reason at this point. Worst case scenario, I still have my locked down old phone.

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Enjoy! For future reference I’d recommend just getting the latest Pixel as you’ll get the longest software support. E.g. a Pixel 8a is supported till May 2031, which is plenty of time to get a lot of usage out of your phone.

      • Lupec@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Right, I’d love to spring up for a 8th gen pixel but I live in an unsupported region and my currency is worth fuck all so I’ll have to make do with a secondhand 7 pro lol. Still fantastic longevity all things considered.

        • FutileRecipe@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ll have to make do with a secondhand 7 pro

          Ouch, that hits me right in the 7Pro feels lol. Make do, indeed, lolol.

          • Lupec@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Honestly, I don’t really need my phone for much so as long as the battery hasn’t degraded too much I’ll be more than happy!

            • FutileRecipe@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’m holding out for the 10. The 8 added mirrored display (so you can mirror your screen on a monitor… I’d rather this come with the Pixel Tablet 2 and the Pixel Tablet skipped it form some reason) and MTE, which GrapheneOS says is the most significant addition to security since they’ve started the OS. If those come with the 10, not to mention the 10 is supposed to have Google’s inhouse chip and not Samsung’s…yep, I’m upgrading.

        • communism@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Personally I’m fine with 8as’ specs and don’t need any of the extra features of the Pixel 8 so I’d prefer to save the money and get an 8a. Plus 8as are supported for longer. Nothing wrong with getting an 8 instead if that’s what you want though

      • Lupec@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’m in an unsupported region so I’m afraid I can’t help much :(

        In my case I just looked around a local eBay-like site and went with a reputable enough seller, fairly standard procedure there.

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Where I am, Pixels are not sold officially either. I got a 7a for around $300. I picked a store with a physical office and made an order not through the site, but through said office. And at least could inspect the phone before buying.

          • Lupec@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ah, that’s a nice way to go about it! I’d have loved to inspect mine beforehand as well but the only real way to grab one around here is importing yourself and paying 60%+ import fees on the damn thing or purchasing a preowned one. My living in a remote area also means there are none close by.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        A brand new Murena Fairphone 4 (North America) is about $600 brand new, IIRC. I’ve been on one for the last 6 months and it’s excellent.

      • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The Pixel 6a is really cheap on the used market, and it still gets updates for at least 3 years.

        The 7a isn’t that expensive either. I recommend staying away from Fairphones, Murena or /e/OS as these are highly insecure, and the companies behind them have repeatedly proven that they don’t give even the slightest fuck about the security of their users. They don’t publish important Android security patches on time, and Fairphone even managed to fully break Android Verified Boot, by signing their ROM with the publicly available (!!!) AOSP test signing keys. It should have been impossible to pass verification, but the vendor conducting the verification seems to be just as incompetent.

        A used Pixel with GrapheneOS is your best option, while still being affordable.

    • Marcus Lee@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I would totally buy a Pixel too but apparently most Pixels here are black market and the IMEIs are banned so I don’t wanna risk getting one that can’t connect to cell networks

      • Lupec@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oof that’s scary. Good thing I have a decent enough return window to at least make sure stuff like that isn’t the case, at least.

  • jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why does this call the problem by it’s name, monopoly.

    Android is another area Google are abusing their monopoly. Sure the phone market is a duopoly, but that doesn’t help. Apple is even more locked down and user abusing.

    Lots of app companies, like bank apps, think locking their apps to only work on official Android is best for security, but that compounds the monopoly. It’s also arguably less secure!

    • MHS@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I don’t even understand. Am I getting this wrong?? Does the payment processing happen inside the banking app?! Because if so, that’s the bigger problem isn’t it? All the checks for correctness should happen on the servers that the banking app connects to, not the banking app itself. If that’s already the case, then what are they worried about? I’m probably missing something here, but honestly I just don’t understand why they would do that.

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The app will almost certainly mostly be just wrapping a web interface. But this dedicated browser can provide the site with all the access of an app. The idea will be only this browser can be trusted to access this site and can check the run environment before connects. I’m they’d do the same on the desktop, if they thought it would be swallowed.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    yeah. like my manufacturers’ 3-year-old, full-o-spyware ROM is more secure than latest lineage.

    they just want control, not security.

    • aquinteros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I have been using stock for a while, but I remember using magisk root to hide root to the bank app and I never had an issue

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        i do that but sadly it aint working anymore. they implemented a new google sanctioned way of blocking it that hasnt been cracked yet.

    • newproph@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      graphene sandboxes Google services so they don’t run as root on your device. I haven’t encountered an app I can’t get running on graphene yet and having Google play installed as non root is a far sight better than stock.

      my biggest problem with lineage was compatibility with banking apps so I reluctantly switched but graphene is a solid choice in operating system for privacy and security.

        • newproph@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          not really. after enabling oem unlocking in developer options you just boot it while holding one of the volume buttons and you’re able to unlock the bootloader.

          root is not typically available and you don’t need it for most uses besides development, but even then, I would recommend not using a phone you daily for that.

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            sure, but unrooted custom roms also trip the protections.

            root can sometimes be used to mask that.

            • newproph@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              you’re already over my head but you can talk to the devs. they have a matrix chat they link on their site

      • kspatlas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Graphene is great, but I’m currently on a Xiaomi phone so I can’t run most ROMs, I’ll likely run derpfest when I get the bootloader unlocked

          • kspatlas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I haven’t tried it yet, but it seems to have a lot of pixel features ported, I realized crDroid supports my phone so I might try that

        • pdxfed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yep been seeing more of that. Will just refuse to use it on my phone.

          It’s been clear for at least 10 years that apps are about data harvesting not making something more useful or easier to use or more universal than a mobile website.

        • vividspecter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’d just leave for a different bank at that point, although I get that it’s not always practical.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        thats what i do atm, but its a shitty solution when i have a perfectly good phone.

        the irony is, my second vanking phone is probably less secure, because its stuck in an ancient version of android.

        • Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Not disagreeing I was genuinely asking.

          For me it wouldnt be too inconvenient but I barely use banks so my perspective is atypical

          • Manalith@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I do basically that, but with aSamsung tablet, then my phone can be for phone things, calls, messages, emails. Then if I’m out and about and need to check my bank, mobile hotspot to my phone and go from there.

            • Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Dont know what you mean sorry

              I did pull $600 out my sock at the best buy to buy my pixel recently tho lol

    • Cyyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      same bs with apps not running jidt because root or apps not being visible in playstore because of it. Netflix isn’t even showing up as existing in playstore just because i have root. it’s nuts. and there are tons of apps like this.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Netflix and their DRM is so extremely stupid it’s incomprehensible. It only hurts normal users while the rippers have no issues getting the content.

      • ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can fix most apps with the Play Integrity Fix module and denylist. You might have to hide the magisk app too. It doesn’t get 100% of them though, I still can’t figure out how my bank app is catching it. Plus I’ve had RCS stop working with that setup, so I have to keep it disabled to avoid missing messages

        • numanair@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The apple music app checks for a specific binary. Could be something like that.

  • jhdeval@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Here’s my take which i have not seen in this thread. When you buy your hardware it is yours you should be allowed to do with it as you please. If you want to wipe the device and install another ROM or os you should be able to. Much like the recent fight for “right to repair” not allowing you to do what you want with your property should not be allowed. As long as the manufacturer blocks your ability to do what you want with your hardware it isn’t really your hardware.

    • gerbler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Furthermore, if the manufacturer wants to pretend that they’re selling you a perpetual license to use the hardware or whatever legal bullshit they came up with on the back of a cocktail napkin between lines of coke then they can’t advertise using the words buy, own or anything similar without explicitly indicating in the largest font that you aren’t the owner of the product.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Unfortunately that line of thinking stops at the divide between hardware and software. You can legally make a phone manufacturer let you unlock a phone’s bootloader so you can install other software, and you can forbid them from denying hardware warranty because you installed other software. Both of which apply in the EU.

      But you can’t make them have their software support or play nice with the other software that you install.

      You also can’t force manufacturers to open up drivers if they’re under NDAs and proprietary licensing (which they often are, due to extensive cross licensing because everybody’s owning patents that can lead to everybody suing everybody if they were ever used).

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is why raspberry pi can’t use a single smartphone recycled screen despite having a DSI port and a billion oled touchscreens going to landfill.

        Also, still is impossible to make Verizon unlock bootloaders

      • stormeuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        To combat this I think drivers, firmware, etc. should be acknowledged as being in the same category as spare parts, manuals, repair tools, etc. They are equally as vital to being able to repair your device, and therefore should be open sourced at the latest when a manufacturer pulls support. Of course I would prefer them to be open sourced immediately, but with how software IP works currently that seems like a pipe dream, especially for devices with very complex drivers, like GPU’s.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Spin off the Android team into a nonprofit. I’m pretty sure OEMs would be all over that.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Actually this isn’t the pwn you think it is because funding results in favors and control. Remember the OpenAI non-profit and Microsoft? You want it to be funded by more than Alphabet. Ideally you want Alphabet’s funding share to not be the largest at all. You want government funding too.

  • Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Recently moved to graphene couldn’t be happier

    I don’t care about these apps but it will only get worse over time if not addressed. I could see things as simple as Spotify, Netflix, etc. Refusing to run

    I don’t use those services either but that’s not a future I want

  • SpiceDealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I really hope the GrapheneOS team succeed. Custom ROMs are reason I’m really into tech today. Coding, FOSS, Linux, etc. all that came from rooting my dad’s HTC phone back in the day. Google shouldn’t cannibalize its children.

  • JCreazy@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m running Graphene OS and its been solid. A few issues here and there with app compatibility but it is fantastic.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The world of mobile phones is a real world example of what we avoided on the PC back in the day when the IBM BIOS got reverse engineered allowing for someone to put out an IBM compatible PC without having to pay the tithe to big blue first.

    It has been pretty depressing to me that the tech literate have been so easily lulled into accepting such things in the name of “cool toys” and “security” virtually everywhere in modern life besides the PC/laptop/server spaces.

    This sort of control and gatekeeping from the likes of Google, Apple, and Qualcomm was not something that was hard to see coming a mile away, yet we all collectively let it happen anyway.

      • NicolaHaskell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Heracles could shoot the eagle and break the chains, but then Prometheus might inform Zeus of the path to Troy. Titanomachy is one way of exchanging fire, but I’m human and content to hand it back and forth between each other. The pain of letting go is nuclear enough after Gaia and Uranus’s Family Vacation tore valleys through the mountains.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Chatgpt, decode this thread

          Your message draws heavily on mythological references and metaphor to discuss the evolution of technology, particularly the ongoing shifts in computing power and platforms. Let’s break it down:

          Stolen Fire from the Gods: This likely references the myth of Prometheus stealing fire from the gods to give to humanity, symbolizing the act of bringing powerful, once-guarded knowledge or technology to the masses. In a modern context, this could relate to how advanced computing technology, once limited to powerful PCs, is now becoming more accessible.
          
          ARM Snapdragon X: ARM architecture, particularly Qualcomm's Snapdragon chips, powers many modern smartphones and tablets. The "Snapdragon X" might symbolize the next step in this evolution, suggesting that these mobile processors are becoming powerful enough to rival traditional PCs, effectively turning a smartphone into a desktop-like experience.
          
          Heracles and the Eagle: In the myth, Heracles shoots the eagle that tortures Prometheus, which could represent a disruption or liberation. Here, it might be a metaphor for technological breakthroughs that disrupt the current state of computing, potentially "freeing" users from traditional PC constraints.
          
          Prometheus informing Zeus: This could suggest the risks of such breakthroughs—informing Zeus of the path to Troy might hint at unintended consequences or revealing strategies that could lead to new challenges or conflicts, perhaps hinting at issues of control, security, or privacy in technology.
          
          Titanomachy: The Titanomachy was a war between the Titans and the Olympians. This might symbolize large-scale technological battles or shifts, like the competition between different tech giants or platforms.
          
          Human Exchange of Fire: Unlike the gods, humans share knowledge and technology with each other, passing "fire" back and forth, which could represent the collaborative and iterative nature of technological progress.
          
          Pain of Letting Go: Innovation often comes with sacrifices—letting go of older technologies or familiar ways of doing things, which can be as painful and destructive as nuclear fission, perhaps referencing the intense impact and change technology can bring, much like the mythological conflicts that reshaped the world.
          
          Gaia and Uranus's Family Vacation: This refers to the myth where Gaia (Earth) and Uranus (Sky) bore the Titans, leading to significant upheavals. This could symbolize the fundamental, tectonic shifts that technological advancements create in society, reshaping landscapes (both literal and metaphorical).
          

          In essence, your message seems to discuss the transformation of computing power, the challenges of innovation, and the profound impacts technology has on society, all wrapped in a mythological narrative.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It has been pretty depressing to me that the tech literate have been so easily lulled into accepting such things in the name of “cool toys” and “security” virtually everywhere in modern life besides the PC/laptop/server spaces.

      From my exposure to supporting said folks with PC related problems, its easy to see the reality here. Phones provide a streamlined experience with zero frills. They don’t want super flexible computing devices, they want appliances. More to the point, the level of care and maintenance needed to have a top-shelf PC experience is time and effort most people would rather not expend. Doing this right was inconvenient to begin with, and left the field wide open for anything that would be easier.

      • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        My complaint is not that the “appliance” solutions exist for those that want them. But that there is next to no room in the market now for options that are not those “appliance” solutions for those that do want them but also want to take part in the modern tech world with things like NFC payments without having to trick the services with Magisk modules.

        • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh, we’re on the same page there. I’m complaining about that too. Things are shifting from “make the environment easier for some people” to “painstakingly chisel out an expert mode like you’re escaping from Shawshank.” and I do not like it.