• ChonkaLoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Thank you Google I hope shitty moves like this drives enough people away to better browsers like Firefox. It desperately needs a bigger market share.

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Google sneezes and your future is stolen by an ad that’s selling it back to you. Google is too big to exist.

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    IT guys will stop using it…

    Which means they’ll stop deploying it as the default browser on some large enterprises, it won’t ship as defaults in pre-baked images going forward.

    Average joes and janes will use Safari and Edge depending on OS.

    Where is their growth going to come from after this change? Chromebooks? lol.

    I hope they do it, it will hurt them in the long run.

    You can bet 300 new uBlock replacements to spring up practically overnight, some of them scams, reducing trust in the Google ecostystem.

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      IT guys will stop using it…

      No, they will not, if they didn’t already. Because convenience it key.

      The browser war is over, and humans lost, corporations won. Google and other huge corporations control the biggest websites and most of the access to content on the internet.

      They just need to make it inconvenient to use ad-blocking browsers.

      They built their business on advertiser gambling, which seem to be flawed concept, because they keep on squeezing that tube for every penny more and more, in a race to the bottom.

      But they are still in control of both browers and content so they have options to keep squeezing more.

      So you want to use a ad blocker? Well, the browser that supports them might not be white listed (anymore) by the bot detector, and you have to solve captchas on every site you visit, until you come to your senses and use a browser, where ad blocking is no longer possible.

      Oh, and all that is ok, because of “security”. Because letting the users be in control of their devices and applications is “in-secure”. They are just doing that to protect you from spam and scams, just trust them! Trust them, because they don’t trust you!

      • Railing5132@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m looking into the possibility of moving my organization to FF. Office of about 200 endpoints. The sticky wicket that I don’t fully understand is Auth passthru to 365.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’re absolutely right.

        That said at least I’ll take this as my cue to peace out of the mainstream web and only use Links2.

    • unrelatedkeg@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      You can bet 300 new uBlock replacements to spring up practically overnight, some of them scams, reducing trust in the Google ecostystem.

      Unfortunately it’s a bigger problem.

      Google doesn’t plan to block uBlock Origin itself, but the APIs it uses to integrate into Chrome in order to function. This will effectively disable all adblockers on Chrome. uBlock won’t be removed from the Chrome extension store, it will just have 90% of its functionality removed.

      Additionally, this isn’t a Chrome-only change, but a change in the open source Chromium, an upstream browser of Chrome all other Chrome-based browsers use (essentially everything aside from Firefox and Safari themselves).

      The change itself is involved in changing the browser’s “Manifest”, a list of allowed API calls for extensions. The current one is called Manifest v2 and the new one was dubbed Manifest v3.

      Theorethically Chromium-based browsers could “backport” Manifest v2 due to the open source nature of Chromium. However that is unlikely as it’s projected to take a lot of resources to change, due mostly to security implications of the change.

      Vendors of other Chromium-based browsers themselves have little to gain from making the change aside from name recognition for “allowing uBlock”, which most users either wouldn’t care for or already use Firefox, so the loss for Google isn’t projected to be large, just as the gains for other vendors.

      TLDR: uBlock won’t be removed from the Chrome extension store, but the mechanisms through which it blocks ads will be blocked. The block isn’t a change in Chrome but in Chromium and affects all Chromium-based brosers (all except Firefox and Safari). Other vendors could change that to allow adblockers but it’s projected to take a lot of time and resources.

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        There is already a “lite” version of uBlock origin that conforms to the new manifest and will still work.

        There are still a few features missing, some can’t be implemented but others will be.

        • Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The ‘block element’ picker is the big one that can not be implemented in the lite version.

          Also included block lists can’t update unless the extension itself updates.

          • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Those seem like really big hurdles. How can those be worked around?

            Is it not possible to trigger a manual block list update?

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Could turn out to be a good thing. All power users will dump Chrome practically overnight, a huge boon to the alternatives, that could actually give them enough momentum to compete with Google for a change. I’m sure they’ve considered this, probably an empty treat.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        me too. a long time ago i practically forced everyone around me to switch to chrome. now I’m doing the opposite.

    • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Every browser is either chromium (open source captured by Google) or exists because of a Google search contract (this represents 80% of Mozilla’s revenue), Google can’t lose

  • Madis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    For other Chromium browsers or those who don’t see this yet, enable chrome://flags#extension-manifest-v2-deprecation-warning.

  • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Adblockers are the largest consumer boycott in history.

    Google isn’t just disabling an extension, they’re attacking a boycott comprised of 200,000,000+ people, all around the globe, standing up to forced manipulation of our beliefs and habits by profit-hungry corporations.

  • shimdidly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not worried about this at all. I don’t use Chrome anyways. I use Brave. It has a built-in ad blocker that works pretty well and I don’t see that going away.