• towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think Portal solved this conundrum by saying portals can’t move.

    Energy is relative when there is a frame of reference.
    When the tram-portal is the frame of reference, the person has the energy. And speedy thing goes in, speedy thing comes out.
    Using Portals canon, the person cannot be the frame of reference (ie 0 energy), because the portal has to move for that scenario - which is Portal-ly impossible. So the person has to come flying out.
    If you break Portals canon and say that portals can move, then then the person would likely be super-compacted (matter transporting on top of existing matter) into a singularity or just destroyed.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s canon that they portaled between earth and moon. For a portal to be stationary relative to both, it has to be moving relative to its opposite end.

    • greenskye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s literally nothing in the universe that is ‘stationary’ so the entire concept is flawed.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, portals are flawed.
        Anything moving through a protal experiences acceleration, unless the exit-portal is at the instantaneously-exact position of the entrance portal.
        There has to be rules and limits that are ignored if portals are to exist, which is what the hypothetical situation is presentin5