• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t see the problem there. If someone is doing a good thing because it is profitable for them to do that good thing that’s fine.

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right, but the thing is most of the time companies do horrible things to boost their profits. Like Unity in the last few days. Valve doing seemingly pro-consumer things to protect their profits is a rarity, and it’s really only a side-effect that there’s consumer benefit. They aren’t doing it to benefit consumers, they’re doing it to preserve their marketplace. It’s a side effect that it gives consumers more options. Valve is an unusually forward-thinking company when it comes to its long-term viability.

      • chocobo13z@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe I want to root for the unprecedentedly forward thinking companies, because it’s like a glimpse of what a lot of companies probably look like in other countries, especially the Nordic countries, that haven’t had a history that led to their governments being able to be used as a tool to stifle competition, unlike the US

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay, I may have misunderstood the intent of your comment. I thought you were saying something like we should be mad at Valve for helping Linux because it helps their profits. It now seems like you were just making sure everyone was aware of the context. Valve has always been one of the companies that is on a pedestal in gamers’ eyes. Like Bethesda prior to Fallout 76 and paid mods/creation club. I agree, we should hold them to the same level of scrutiny of other companies.