I am not allowed to credit the site that has this disaster. Its owner said “Nobody should see that”

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    0·
    2 months ago

    That’s interesting. Chrome displays it as you intended, Firefox doesn’t. I guess it’s required that the vertical flex be inline-flex?

    • drathvedro@lemm.ee
      0·
      2 months ago

      Huh, neat. The last time I looked, chrome was also plagued by this. Might actually re-start some projects I had, but it sucks to have to use chrome.

      inline-flex is indeed necessary since we’re growing left to right and flex would take the entire/fixed width, unless it’s also inside a flexbox.

      • bleistift2@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        0·
        2 months ago

        it sucks to have to use chrome

        I also hate to admit it, but Chrome currently is the superior browser.

        • drathvedro@lemm.ee
          0·
          2 months ago

          EDIT: Alright, this is a terrible case because the parent element has flex and therefore no inline-flex is necessary there, but I’d argue it’s the parent element being flex that is redundant, rather than child element being inline.