The writings of the person who killed three 9-year-olds and three adults at a private Christian elementary school in Nashville last year cannot be released to the public, a judge ruled Thursday.

Chancery Court Judge I’Ashea Myles found that The Covenant School children and parents hold the copyright to any writings or other works created by shooter Audrey Hale, a former student who was killed by police. As part of the effort to keep the records closed, Hale’s parents transferred ownership of Hale’s property to the victims’ families, who then argued in court that they should be allowed to determine who has access to them.

Myles agreed, ruling that “the original writings, journals, art, photos and videos created by Hale” are subject to an exception to the Tennessee Public Records Act created by the federal Copyright Act.

The shooter left behind at least 20 journals, a suicide note and a memoir, according to court filings. When the records requests were denied, several parties sued, and the situation quickly ballooned into a messy mix of conspiracy theories, leaked documents, probate battles and accusations of ethical misconduct. Myles’ order will almost surely be appealed.

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s not about the public’s ‘rights’ tho. It’s about the victims’ families and their rights … which in this case the judge decided on the side of the families.

    I for one am glad of that because it gives the families at least some sense of control over a situation they originally had zero control over.

    • beetlejuice0001@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gun regulation is control which is declined

      If anyone had control over the writings it would have been the shooters family. A judge Giving away first amendment rights seems wrong.

      • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ok. So how would you personally benefit from the killer’s writings being publically released?

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Maybe my would-be killer gets caught because their psychologist studied the killer’s writings and noticed a troubling pattern.

          I don’t want even more manifestos glorified and memed on 4chan. I’m cognizant there’s generally a reason horrible things see the light of the public eye.

          Body cam footage of someone’s worst moments of their life… release it, violate one person’s privacy, keep one officer/department accountable, public has to weigh that tradeoff.

          Even releasing lottery winners’ names ruins lives, but otherwise some would assume the lottery’s fraudulent (money going to politicians’ friends)… instead of just a tax on the poor 🌈

          • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            None of that tells me how you would personally benefit from this killer’s writings being published.

            • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Not dying:

              Maybe my would-be killer gets caught because their psychologist studied the killer’s writings and noticed a troubling pattern.

              Guy wants to kill me. Guy complains about me to their therapist without mentioning killing me. Therapist thinks “wait, this sounds like something I’ve read…”

              And what they read was some lunatic’s writings that were released. Therapist is then able to report their concerns via appropriate channels and medicates my would-be killer, and I live another day.

              • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                That is crap. What-ifs don’t benefit you directly like that.

                There is absolutely zero reason that the judge erred in his ruling.

                You just want to feed your snoopy gene. Nothing else.

                • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  That is crap. What-ifs don’t benefit you directly like that.

                  What do you mean?

                  snoopy

                  When it comes to violence, I pretty much stop at the headlines. Watched brutal videos many years ago & I’m set for a lifetime on the bulk of true crime and also fictional violence.

                  I was actually wondering if materials could be released in a limited fashion: send an application, go to a reading room… try to avoid leaks but still let people get science done or whatnot.