• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Democrats have had control of house, senate, white house exactly 4 months of the last 44 years.

    Democrats: “We only have 60 votes in the Senate! That’s not enough to pass anything!”

    Republicans: “The Senate minority will filibuster the debt ceiling bill unless you extend the Bush tax cuts, double border spending, and add birth control pills to the Schedule I drug registry.”

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Breaking things is a thousand times easier than fixing them. It’s easy for Republicans to threaten to break the government unless they get what they want, because it’s a win-win scenario for them.

      • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m gonna go ahead and ask the obvious question: if it’s so effective when the Republicans do it, then…you can fill in the rest.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not really. I don’t understand where you’re going.

          Are you saying Democrats should threaten to break the government? Republicans would call that bet, because breaking the government is a good thing to them.

          • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            How do you figure? If they’re in power and let the government, they get blamed for it. Call the bluff. Let the government fail. If it’s in a position where one political entity gets to hold it hostage in perpetuity, it’s functionally unsalvageable and broken by design.