• demlet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone here will pretend they would be fine with it now that you called out the hypocrisy. Or they’ll argue men deserve it as some kind of “payback”, in which case it’s really not about equality of course.

    • deus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sorry, they’ll argue that men deserve what as a form of payback? Cause you’re phrasing it like there’s some kind of discrmination or persecution against men going on here and I fail to see it.

      • demlet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t have to be persecution to be sexist and therefore hypocritical in a culture that claims to be opposed to sexism. I’m personally fine with a joke like this, I just also happen to think that if the characters in this one were reversed there would be all sorts of outrage and accusations of toxic masculinity.

        • criitz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          That context matters, though. We live in a world where women are historically predated on by men, which would make the gender-swapped version insensitive. Absent that context, I think this works he fine in either gender position, but because of that context, showing it this way isn’t as bad as showing it with the genders reversed. With that in mind the difference isn’t hypocritical.